School of Instrument Science and Engineering at Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Oct 8;2018:5396030. doi: 10.1155/2018/5396030. eCollection 2018.
An accurate and continuous measurement of blood pressure (BP) is of great importance for the prognosis of some cardiovascular diseases in out-of-hospital settings. Pulse transit time (PTT) is a well-known cardiovascular parameter which is highly correlated with BP and has been widely applied in the estimation of continuous BP. However, due to the complexity of cardiovascular system, the accuracy of PTT-based BP estimation is still unsatisfactory. Recent studies indicate that, for the subjects before and after exercise, PTT can track the high-frequency BP oscillation (HF-BP) well, but is inadequate to follow the low-frequency BP variance (LF-BP). Unfortunately, the cause for this failure of PTT in LF-BP estimation is still unclear. Based on these previous researches, we investigated the cause behind this failure of PTT in LF-BP estimation. The heart rate- (HR-) related arterial baroreflex (ABR) model was introduced to analyze the failure of PTT in LF-BP estimation. Data from 42 healthy volunteers before and after exercise were collected to evaluate the correlation between the ABR sensitivity and the estimation error of PTT-based BP in LF and HF components. In the correlation plot, an obvious difference was observed between the LF and HF groups. The correlation coefficient for the ABR sensitivity with the estimation error of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in LF was 0.817 ± 0.038 and 0.757 ± 0.069, respectively. However, those correlation coefficient for the ABR sensitivity with the estimation error of SBP and DBP in HF was only 0.403 ± 0.145 and 0.274 ± 0.154, respectively. These results indicated that there is an ABR-related complex LF autonomic regulation mechanism on BP, PTT, and HR, which influences the effect of PTT in LF-BP estimation.
血压(BP)的准确连续测量对于院外某些心血管疾病的预后非常重要。脉搏传输时间(PTT)是一种众所周知的心血管参数,与 BP 高度相关,并已广泛应用于连续 BP 的估计。然而,由于心血管系统的复杂性,基于 PTT 的 BP 估计的准确性仍然不尽人意。最近的研究表明,对于运动前后的受试者,PTT 可以很好地跟踪高频 BP 振荡(HF-BP),但不足以跟踪低频 BP 变化(LF-BP)。不幸的是,PTT 在 LF-BP 估计中失败的原因尚不清楚。基于这些先前的研究,我们研究了 PTT 在 LF-BP 估计中失败的原因。引入心率相关的动脉压力反射(ABR)模型来分析 PTT 在 LF-BP 估计中失败的原因。收集了 42 名健康志愿者运动前后的数据,以评估 ABR 敏感性与基于 PTT 的 LF 和 HF 分量中 BP 估计误差之间的相关性。在相关图中,LF 和 HF 组之间观察到明显差异。ABR 敏感性与 LF 中收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)估计误差的相关系数 分别为 0.817 ± 0.038 和 0.757 ± 0.069。然而,ABR 敏感性与 HF 中 SBP 和 DBP 估计误差的相关系数 仅为 0.403 ± 0.145 和 0.274 ± 0.154。这些结果表明,BP、PTT 和 HR 之间存在与 ABR 相关的复杂 LF 自主调节机制,这影响了 PTT 在 LF-BP 估计中的效果。