Davies Robert W, Carson Brian P, Jakeman Philip M
Department of Physical Education & Sports Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Food for Health Ireland, Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation & Immunity (4i), University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 23;9:1480. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01480. eCollection 2018.
To investigate sex differences in the temporal recovery of neuromuscular function following resistance training (RT), eleven men and eight women 18-35 years completed a single RT bout (barbell back-squats, 80 % 1RM, 5 sets × 5 reps, 25 % duty cycle, then 1 set × max reps). Measures of muscle function (isometric, concentric, eccentric knee extensor strength, and countermovement jump (CMJ) height), serum creatine kinase activity (CK) and lower-body muscle pain were assessed before RT (0 h), +4 h, +24 h, +48 h, and +72 h post-RT. Data are mean % change from PRE (SD) and effect size (ω, d). Men and women had similar RT-experience (men, 2.1 (0.8) years vs. women 2.4 (1.0) years, = 0.746, and = 0.3) and 1RM strength per kg lean mass (men, 1.9 (0.2) kg⋅kg vs. women, 1.8 (0.3) kg⋅kg, = 0.303, and = 0.3). A 36 (12)% increase in lower-body muscle pain was reported following RT ( < 0.05, > 0.9). There was an absence of any overt change in CK [+24 h, 74 (41) IU⋅L; pooled mean (SD)]. Decrements in knee extensor strength and CMJ height were observed +4 to +72 h for both men and women ( < 0.05, ω = 0.19-0.69). Sex differences were apparent for CMJ height (+24 h men, -10 (6)% vs. women, -20 (11)%, < 0.001, and = 1.8) and isokinetic concentric strength (+24 h men, -10 (13)% vs. women -25 (14)%, = 0.006, and = 1.8), with a more pronounced loss and prolonged recovery in women compared to men (e.g., CMJ + 72 h men, -3 (6)% vs. women, -13 (12)%, = 0.051, and = 1.1). We conclude that the different temporal recovery patterns between men and women are not explicable by differences in muscle strength, RT performance, experience, muscle damage or fatigability.
为了研究抗阻训练(RT)后神经肌肉功能的时间恢复情况中的性别差异,11名18 - 35岁的男性和8名同龄女性完成了一次RT训练(杠铃后深蹲,80%的1次最大重复量,5组×5次重复,25%的工作周期,然后1组×最大重复次数)。在RT前(0小时)、RT后+4小时、+24小时、+48小时和+72小时评估肌肉功能(等长、向心、离心膝关节伸肌力量以及反向运动跳跃(CMJ)高度)、血清肌酸激酶活性(CK)和下半身肌肉疼痛。数据为相对于训练前(PRE)的平均变化百分比(SD)和效应量(ω,d)。男性和女性的RT经验相似(男性,2.1(0.8)年 vs. 女性2.4(1.0)年,P = 0.746,Cohen's d = 0.3),每千克去脂体重的1次最大重复量力量也相似(男性,1.9(0.2)kg·kg vs. 女性,1.8(0.3)kg·kg,P = 0.303,Cohen's d = 0.3)。RT后报告下半身肌肉疼痛增加了36(12)%(P < 0.05,Cohen's d > 0.9)。CK没有明显变化[+24小时,74(41)IU·L;合并均值(SD)]。男性和女性在RT后+4至+72小时均观察到膝关节伸肌力量和CMJ高度下降(P < 0.05,ω = 0.19 - 0.69)。CMJ高度(+24小时男性,下降-10(6)% vs. 女性,-20(11)%,P < 0.001,Cohen's d = 1.8)和等速向心力量(+24小时男性,下降-10(13)% vs. 女性 -25(14)%,P = 0.006,Cohen's d = 1.8)存在性别差异,与男性相比,女性的下降更明显且恢复时间更长(例如,CMJ + 72小时男性,下降-3(6)% vs. 女性,-13(12)%,P = 0.051,Cohen's d = 1.1)。我们得出结论,男性和女性不同的时间恢复模式不能用肌肉力量、RT表现、经验、肌肉损伤或疲劳性的差异来解释。