Samson Robert A, Hong Seung-Beom, Frisvad Jens C
Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Korean Agricultural Culture Collection, NIAB, Suwon, Korea.
Med Mycol. 2006 Sep 1;44(Supplement_1):S133-S148. doi: 10.1080/13693780600913224.
The classification of the genus Aspergillus has been studied by many taxonomists. The most important monograph on which most taxonomies are derived from is strictly based on phenotypical characters. Later revisions of certain Aspergillus sections have been predominantly nomenclatural changes and primarily used morphological criteria. Many new taxa were added particularly in the genera Emericella and Neosartorya. Identification of the most common and often important species remains problematic due to the variability in the phenotypic characters. This has caused errors in the literature, especially concerning the links to mycotoxin formation. The new taxonomies are based on a polyphasic approach using phenotypical characters together with multigene DNA sequences. In a polyphasic approach micro- and macromorphology, physiology, metabolites produced and molecular data are all important, and in principle no particular method should be overemphasized. In particular extrolite profiles have proven to be specific for the taxa and this has contributed to a stable species concept, but DNA sequence data have also been very valuable in critical revisions of species and their taxonomy and phylogeny. Examples of new classifications for species in section Circumdati, Flavi,Fumigati and Nigri are presented. Although the polyphasic approach might reveal clear cut species, problems may arise for some species if they are to be separated based only on their microscopic features and few physiological features. Suggestions for new methods in order to carry out more fast and precise identifications will be discussed. Full genome sequencing and DNA arrays offers exciting new bases for identifying the Aspergilli, but recent methods based on image analysis of accurately fingerprinted phenotypes are also very promising. However both methods require a stable and well resolved taxonomy and nomenclature. Validated careful phenotypic classification (taxonomy) together with phylogenetic treatment of DNA sequence data is a prerequisite for reliable rapid identification methods and database formation. Concerning identification, DNA bar coding will be possible in the future, either based on molecular methods or certain phenotypic features.
许多分类学家都对曲霉属进行过研究。大多数分类法所依据的最重要的专著严格基于表型特征。后来对曲霉属某些组的修订主要是命名上的变化,主要使用形态学标准。特别是在新萨托菌属和埃默里菌属中增加了许多新分类单元。由于表型特征的变异性,鉴定最常见且通常很重要的物种仍然存在问题。这在文献中导致了错误,尤其是在与霉菌毒素形成的关联方面。新的分类法基于一种多相方法,将表型特征与多基因DNA序列结合使用。在多相方法中,微观和宏观形态、生理学、产生的代谢物以及分子数据都很重要,原则上不应过分强调某一种特定方法。特别是次生代谢产物谱已被证明对分类单元具有特异性,这有助于形成稳定的物种概念,但DNA序列数据在物种及其分类和系统发育的关键修订中也非常有价值。文中给出了环带组、黄曲霉组、烟曲霉组和黑曲霉组中物种新分类的示例。尽管多相方法可能会揭示出明确的物种,但对于某些物种,如果仅根据其微观特征和少数生理特征进行区分,可能会出现问题。将讨论为实现更快速、精确鉴定而采用新方法的建议。全基因组测序和DNA阵列提供了用于鉴定曲霉的令人兴奋的新基础,但基于对精确指纹化表型进行图像分析的最新方法也非常有前景。然而,这两种方法都需要稳定且解析良好的分类法和命名法。经过验证的仔细表型分类(分类学)以及对DNA序列数据的系统发育处理是可靠的快速鉴定方法和数据库形成的先决条件。关于鉴定,未来基于分子方法或某些表型特征进行DNA条形码编码将成为可能。