• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境依赖的风险规避:一种基于模型的方法。

Context-Dependent Risk Aversion: A Model-Based Approach.

作者信息

Cuevas Rivera Darío, Ott Florian, Markovic Dimitrije, Strobel Alexander, Kiebel Stefan J

机构信息

Chair of Neuroimaging, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Chair of Differential and Personality Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 26;9:2053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02053. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02053
PMID:30416474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6212575/
Abstract

Most research on risk aversion in behavioral science with human subjects has focused on a component of risk aversion that does not adapt itself to context. More recently, studies have explored risk aversion adaptation to changing circumstances in sequential decision-making tasks. It is an open question whether one can identify evidence, at the single subject level, for such risk aversion adaptation. We conducted a behavioral experiment on human subjects, using a sequential decision making task. We developed a model-based approach for estimating the adaptation of risk-taking behavior with single-trial resolution by modeling a subject's goals and internal representation of task contingencies. Using this model-based approach, we estimated the subject-specific adaptation of risk aversion depending on the current task context. We found striking inter-subject variations in the adaptation of risk-taking behavior. We show that these differences can be explained by differences in subjects' internal representations of task contingencies and goals. We discuss that the proposed approach can be adapted to a wide range of experimental paradigms and be used to analyze behavioral measures other than risk aversion.

摘要

行为科学中针对人类受试者的大多数风险厌恶研究都集中在风险厌恶的一个不适应情境的组成部分上。最近,研究探讨了在顺序决策任务中风险厌恶对不断变化的情况的适应性。在单受试者层面上是否能够识别出这种风险厌恶适应性的证据,这还是一个悬而未决的问题。我们使用顺序决策任务对人类受试者进行了一项行为实验。我们开发了一种基于模型的方法,通过对受试者的目标和任务偶然性的内部表征进行建模,以单次试验分辨率估计冒险行为的适应性。使用这种基于模型的方法,我们根据当前任务情境估计了受试者特定的风险厌恶适应性。我们发现冒险行为适应性在受试者之间存在显著差异。我们表明,这些差异可以通过受试者对任务偶然性和目标的内部表征差异来解释。我们讨论了所提出的方法可以适用于广泛的实验范式,并用于分析除风险厌恶之外的行为测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/3ecc9dfc3007/fpsyg-09-02053-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/b0ab7fe98ed5/fpsyg-09-02053-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/c9e2ada3ecb7/fpsyg-09-02053-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/b78a69b62c31/fpsyg-09-02053-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/499ad93a4299/fpsyg-09-02053-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/5664103f10a7/fpsyg-09-02053-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/a80aaf6a4ceb/fpsyg-09-02053-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/7d5d3ef2e81d/fpsyg-09-02053-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/3ecc9dfc3007/fpsyg-09-02053-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/b0ab7fe98ed5/fpsyg-09-02053-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/c9e2ada3ecb7/fpsyg-09-02053-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/b78a69b62c31/fpsyg-09-02053-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/499ad93a4299/fpsyg-09-02053-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/5664103f10a7/fpsyg-09-02053-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/a80aaf6a4ceb/fpsyg-09-02053-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/7d5d3ef2e81d/fpsyg-09-02053-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c68/6212575/3ecc9dfc3007/fpsyg-09-02053-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Context-Dependent Risk Aversion: A Model-Based Approach.情境依赖的风险规避:一种基于模型的方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 26;9:2053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02053. eCollection 2018.
2
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
3
Combinations of low-level and high-level neural processes account for distinct patterns of context-dependent choice.低水平和高水平神经过程的组合解释了上下文相关选择的不同模式。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Oct 14;15(10):e1007427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007427. eCollection 2019 Oct.
4
Dopamine-Dependent Loss Aversion during Effort-Based Decision-Making.基于努力的决策中的多巴胺依赖的损失厌恶。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 15;40(3):661-670. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1760-19.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
5
Source preference and ambiguity aversion: models and evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging experiments.来源偏好与模糊规避:来自行为和神经成像实验的模型与证据
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008;20:179-201.
6
Neural markers of loss aversion in resting-state brain activity.静息态脑活动中损失规避的神经标记物。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 1;146:257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.050. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Risk sensitivity as an evolutionary adaptation.作为一种进化适应性的风险敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2015 Feb 4;5:8242. doi: 10.1038/srep08242.
8
Situational pressures on aviation decision making: goal seduction and situation aversion.航空决策中的情境压力:目标诱惑与情境厌恶。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Jun;80(6):556-60. doi: 10.3357/asem.2363.2009.
9
Determinants of Propranolol's Selective Effect on Loss Aversion.普萘洛尔对损失厌恶的选择性作用的决定因素。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1123-30. doi: 10.1177/0956797615582026. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Threat affects risk preferences in movement decision making.威胁会影响运动决策中的风险偏好。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun 9;9:150. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00150. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Common and Distinct Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk Seeking and Risk Aversion: Evidence From the Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis.寻求风险和规避风险背后的共同和不同神经机制:来自神经影像学荟萃分析的证据
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 1;46(11):e70295. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70295.
2
Meta-control of the exploration-exploitation dilemma emerges from probabilistic inference over a hierarchy of time scales.元控制探索-开发困境源自于对时间尺度层级的概率推断。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Jun;21(3):509-533. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00837-x. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Differential effects of real versus hypothetical monetary reward magnitude on risk-taking behavior and brain activity.真实与假设货币奖励大小对冒险行为和大脑活动的差异影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 27;8(1):3712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21820-0.
2
Reminders of past choices bias decisions for reward in humans.过去选择的提示会影响人类对奖励的决策。
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 27;8:15958. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15958.
3
How (in)variant are subjective representations of described and experienced risk and rewards?所描述和经历的风险与回报的主观表征有多(不)可变?
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:126-138. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
4
Model-Based Reasoning in Humans Becomes Automatic with Training.人类基于模型的推理经过训练后会变得自动化。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 17;11(9):e1004463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004463. eCollection 2015 Sep.
5
Four converging measures of temporal discounting and their relationships with intelligence, executive functions, thinking dispositions, and behavioral outcomes.时间折扣的四种收敛性测量方法及其与智力、执行功能、思维倾向和行为结果的关系。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 5;6:728. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00728. eCollection 2015.
6
Active inference and epistemic value.主动推理与认知价值。
Cogn Neurosci. 2015;6(4):187-214. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1020053. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
Active inference, evidence accumulation, and the urn task.主动推理、证据积累与瓮任务。
Neural Comput. 2015 Feb;27(2):306-28. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00699. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
8
How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion.如何使损失厌恶消失并逆转:基于损失厌恶抽样起源的决策测试。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):7-11. doi: 10.1037/xge0000039. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
9
The Dopaminergic Midbrain Encodes the Expected Certainty about Desired Outcomes.多巴胺能中脑编码对期望结果的预期确定性。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Oct;25(10):3434-45. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu159. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
10
Multiple neural mechanisms of decision making and their competition under changing risk pressure.多种决策的神经机制及其在不断变化的风险压力下的竞争。
Neuron. 2014 Mar 5;81(5):1190-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.033.