Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 12;8(1):16670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34702-2.
Laboratory testing for Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) is essential for a differential diagnosis, yet little is known about Q fever diagnostic testing practices in the United States. We retrospectively analyzed Q fever immunoglobulin G (IgG) indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) testing data between 1/1/2012-10/31/2016 from ARUP, LabCorp, Mayo Medical Laboratories, and Quest Diagnostics. Data included IgG phase I and phase II titers, patient age and sex, and state and date of specimen collection. On average, 12,821 specimens were tested for Q fever annually by the participating laboratories. Of 64,106 total specimens, 84.1% tested negative for C. burnetii-specific antibodies. Positive titers ranged from 16 to 262,144 against both phase I and phase II antigens. Submission of specimens peaked during the summer months, and more specimens were submitted from the West North Central division. Testing occurred more frequently in males (53%) and increased with age. In conclusion, few U.S. Q fever cases are reported, despite large volumes of diagnostic specimens tested. Review of commercial laboratory data revealed a lack of paired serology samples and patterns of serology titers that differ from case reporting diagnostic criteria.
实验室检测 Q 热(柯克斯体)对于鉴别诊断至关重要,但美国对 Q 热诊断检测实践知之甚少。我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 10 月 31 日期间 ARUP、LabCorp、梅奥医学实验室和 Quest 诊断公司的 Q 热免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)间接免疫荧光检测(IFA)检测数据。数据包括 IgG Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期滴度、患者年龄和性别,以及标本采集的州和日期。平均而言,参与实验室每年对 12821 份标本进行 Q 热检测。在 64106 份总标本中,84.1%的标本对柯克斯体特异性抗体检测呈阴性。阳性滴度范围为 16 至 262144,针对 I 期和 II 期抗原。标本的提交在夏季达到高峰,来自中西部地区的标本更多。检测在男性(53%)中更频繁,并且随年龄增长而增加。总之,尽管进行了大量的诊断标本检测,但美国报告的 Q 热病例很少。对商业实验室数据的审查显示,缺乏配对血清学样本,且血清学滴度模式与病例报告诊断标准不同。