Wang Danhong, Li Meiling, Wang Meiyun, Schoeppe Franziska, Ren Jianxun, Chen Huafu, Öngür Dost, Brady Roscoe O, Baker Justin T, Liu Hesheng
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Key Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;25(9):2119-2129. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0276-1. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Neuroimaging studies of psychotic disorders have demonstrated abnormalities in structural and functional connectivity involving widespread brain networks. However, these group-level observations have failed to yield any biomarkers that can provide confirmatory evidence of a patient's current symptoms, predict future symptoms, or predict a treatment response. Lack of precision in both neuroanatomical and clinical boundaries have likely contributed to the inability of even well-powered studies to resolve these key relationships. Here, we employed a novel approach to defining individual-specific functional connectivity in 158 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (n = 49), schizoaffective disorder (n = 37), or bipolar disorder with psychosis (n = 72), and identified neuroimaging features that track psychotic symptoms in a dimension- or disorder-specific fashion. Using individually specified functional connectivity, we were able to estimate positive, negative, and manic symptoms that showed correlations ranging from r = 0.35 to r = 0.51 with the observed symptom scores. Comparing optimized estimation models among schizophrenia spectrum patients, positive and negative symptoms were associated with largely non-overlapping sets of cortical connections. Comparing between schizophrenia spectrum and bipolar disorder patients, the models for positive symptoms were largely non-overlapping between the two disorder classes. Finally, models derived using conventional region definition strategies performed at chance levels for most symptom domains. Individual-specific functional connectivity analyses revealed important new distinctions among cortical circuits responsible for the positive and negative symptoms, as well as key new information about how circuits underlying symptom expressions may vary depending on the underlying etiology and illness syndrome from which they manifest.
对精神障碍的神经影像学研究表明,涉及广泛脑网络的结构和功能连接存在异常。然而,这些基于群体水平的观察未能产生任何生物标志物,以提供患者当前症状的确证证据、预测未来症状或预测治疗反应。神经解剖学和临床界限缺乏精确性,可能导致即使是样本量充足的研究也无法解决这些关键关系。在此,我们采用了一种新方法来定义158例被诊断为精神分裂症(n = 49)、分裂情感性障碍(n = 37)或伴有精神病性症状的双相情感障碍(n = 72)患者的个体特异性功能连接,并确定了以维度或疾病特异性方式追踪精神病性症状的神经影像学特征。使用个体指定的功能连接,我们能够估计出与观察到的症状评分相关性在r = 0.35至r = 0.51之间的阳性、阴性和躁狂症状。在精神分裂症谱系患者中比较优化后的估计模型,阳性和阴性症状与大量不重叠的皮质连接集相关。在精神分裂症谱系和双相情感障碍患者之间进行比较,两种疾病类别中阳性症状的模型在很大程度上不重叠。最后,使用传统区域定义策略得出的模型在大多数症状领域的表现处于随机水平。个体特异性功能连接分析揭示了负责阳性和阴性症状的皮质回路之间重要的新差异,以及关于症状表达背后的回路如何根据其表现的潜在病因和疾病综合征而变化的关键新信息。