Suppr超能文献

三种从真菌培养物中提取DNA方法的评估。

Evaluation of three DNA extraction methods from fungal cultures.

作者信息

Kumar Mahadevan, Mugunthan M

机构信息

Professor (Microbiology), Army Hospital (R&R), New Delhi 110010, India.

Consultant (Microbiology), Yashoda Hospitals Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Med J Armed Forces India. 2018 Oct;74(4):333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays have been developed to amplify DNA of fungal pathogens as culture-based detection methods show low sensitivity. In order to perform a sensitive, specific, and reliable PCR based assay, the availability of pure DNA as well as an easy-to-perform DNA extraction protocol is essential. The existing protocols for DNA extraction used for bacteria or viruses show poor release of fungal DNA. In this study, we evaluated three different methods of DNA extraction and compared their efficacy in the extraction of DNA from filamentous fungi, yeasts, and dermatophytes commonly isolated in our laboratory. It was found that the Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp, Ontario, Canada) demonstrated satisfactory extraction of DNA from all the fungi analyzed as compared to that of the Qiamp DNA extraction kit (Qiagen GmbH, Dusseldorf, Germany) or the Phenol Chloroform Isoamyl alcohol extraction method which failed to extract amplifiable DNA from many of the fungal species. Thus, we recommend the use of Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen) with modifications for the extraction of DNA from fungal cultures.

摘要

由于基于培养的检测方法灵敏度较低,已开发出基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法来扩增真菌病原体的DNA。为了进行灵敏、特异且可靠的基于PCR的检测,纯DNA的可用性以及易于操作的DNA提取方案至关重要。现有的用于细菌或病毒的DNA提取方案对真菌DNA的释放效果不佳。在本研究中,我们评估了三种不同的DNA提取方法,并比较了它们从我们实验室常见分离的丝状真菌、酵母和皮肤癣菌中提取DNA的效果。结果发现,与Qiamp DNA提取试剂盒(德国杜塞尔多夫的Qiagen GmbH公司)或苯酚-氯仿-异戊醇提取方法相比,真菌/酵母基因组DNA分离试剂盒(加拿大安大略省的Norgen Biotek Corp公司)从所有分析的真菌中都能令人满意地提取DNA,而后两种方法无法从许多真菌物种中提取可扩增的DNA。因此,我们建议使用经过改良的真菌/酵母基因组DNA分离试剂盒(Norgen)从真菌培养物中提取DNA。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of three DNA extraction methods from fungal cultures.三种从真菌培养物中提取DNA方法的评估。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2018 Oct;74(4):333-336. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
New strategy for rapid diagnosis and characterization of keratomycosis.快速诊断和鉴定角膜真菌病的新策略。
Ophthalmology. 2012 May;119(5):945-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.038. Epub 2012 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Aspergillus PCR: one step closer to standardization.曲霉 PCR:更接近标准化一步。
J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Apr;48(4):1231-40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01767-09. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
5
An update on the molecular diagnosis of invasive fungal disease.侵袭性真菌病分子诊断的最新进展。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009 Jul;296(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01575.x. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验