Lee Alexander S, Hart Joy L, Walker Kandi L, Keith Rachel J, Ridner S Lee
Department of Communication, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA and American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA and American Heart Association Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Int J Healthc Med Sci. 2018 Jun;4(6):111-116.
E-cigarette use has grown in popularity, especially as the devices have been touted as smoking cessation tools. In an exploratory study, we sought to compare dual users (i.e., users of both combustible tobacco and e-cigarettes) to e-cigarette only users.
The Electronic Cigarette Opinion Survey (ECOS) was employed to assess users' (n=78) perceptions and consumption of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. Quantity of e-juice and nicotine used and time of initial nicotine exposure were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between e-cigarette use behaviors and being an e-cigarette only user compared to a dual user.
Compared to dual users, e-cigarette only users consumed higher levels of nicotine in e-juice (p=0.0009) and more nicotine per month (p=0.03). For dual users, the time of first nicotine exposure after waking was significantly earlier than for e-cigarette only users (mean= 9.6 minutes (SD= 8.0) and mean= 26.6 minutes (SD= 22.0), respectively; p=0.0056). Results from the regression models suggest the amount of e-juice consumed and time of first nicotine exposure after waking are significantly associated with being an e-cigarette only user.
These findings shed light on the perceptions and use patterns of e-cigarette only users compared to dual users. As regulation of e-cigarettes is considered, understanding the impact of e-cigarettes and dual use is imperative. Despite frequent marketing claims that e-cigarettes are completely safe, health campaigns need to convey emerging and mixed findings on safety as well as current scientific uncertainty to the public.
电子烟的使用日益普遍,尤其是当这些设备被吹捧为戒烟工具时。在一项探索性研究中,我们试图比较同时使用两种产品的用户(即既使用可燃烟草又使用电子烟的用户)和仅使用电子烟的用户。
采用电子烟意见调查(ECOS)来评估用户(n = 78)对电子烟和可燃香烟的认知及消费情况。评估了电子烟液和尼古丁的使用量以及首次接触尼古丁的时间。使用多变量逻辑回归来评估与仅使用电子烟的用户相比,电子烟使用行为与同时使用两种产品的用户之间的关联。
与同时使用两种产品的用户相比,仅使用电子烟的用户在电子烟液中摄入的尼古丁水平更高(p = 0.0009),且每月摄入的尼古丁更多(p = 0.03)。对于同时使用两种产品的用户,醒来后首次接触尼古丁的时间明显早于仅使用电子烟的用户(分别为平均9.6分钟(标准差 = 8.0)和平均26.6分钟(标准差 = 22.0);p = 0.0056)。回归模型的结果表明,醒来后电子烟液的消耗量和首次接触尼古丁的时间与仅使用电子烟的用户显著相关。
这些发现揭示了仅使用电子烟的用户与同时使用两种产品的用户相比的认知和使用模式。在考虑对电子烟进行监管时,了解电子烟及同时使用两种产品的影响至关重要。尽管经常有营销宣传称电子烟完全安全,但健康宣传活动需要向公众传达关于安全性的新出现的混合研究结果以及当前的科学不确定性。