Dubois F, Goudeau A
Laboratoire de Virologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire, Tours, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Jul;26(7):1339-42. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.7.1339-1342.1988.
The kinetics of delta antigen (HDAg) and anti-delta antibody (anti-HD) was analyzed in 22 acute delta hepatitis infections (11 coinfections and 11 superinfections), with an enzyme immunoassay developed by Organon Teknika and with two commercially available assays: Deltassay, a test for HDAg from Noctech and Abbott anti-delta enzyme immunoassay, a test for anti-HD from Abbott Laboratories. In seven cases, HDAg was detected with the Organon assay but not with Deltassay. These discrepancies were not related to the type of hepatitis delta virus infection. All samples from these patients taken beyond week 4 of illness were found anti-HD positive with both the Organon and Abbott anti-HD assays. These data reflect the lack of sensitivity of Deltassay. In no instance were HDAg and anti-HD present simultaneously when tested with the Organon assays. On the contrary, 10 sera among the 28 that were HDAg positive with the Organon assay also were found anti-HD positive with the Abbott test. We suspected that the test procedure recommended by Abbott (a one-step competitive assay) may have yielded false-positive anti-HD results when HDAg present in the sera reacted with peroxidase-labeled anti-HD of the kit. To determine the specificity of the simultaneous presence of HDAg and anti-HD, these 10 sera were retested with the Abbott anti-HD assay, but by a modified two-step procedure that avoided contact between sera and labeled antibody. For six sera a negative result was obtained with the second procedure, suggesting that a false anti-HD reaction occurred with the standard test procedure. For four sera a positive result with both procedures was indicative of the simultaneous presence of HDAg and anti-HD. In conclusion, assay for HDAg was found very convenient for the early diagnosis of acute hepatitis delta virus infections. Seroconversion to anti-HD could be used for a late diagnosis 2 to 5 weeks after the beginning of illness. However, anti-HD results obtained with one-step competitive assays have to be interpreted carefully in HDAg-positive sera.
采用欧加农公司开发的酶免疫分析法以及两种市售检测方法,对22例急性丁型肝炎感染病例(11例合并感染和11例重叠感染)的丁型抗原(HDAg)和抗丁型抗体(抗-HD)动力学进行了分析。这两种市售检测方法分别是:Noctech公司的检测HDAg的Deltassay检测法,以及雅培公司的检测抗-HD的雅培抗丁型酶免疫分析法。在7例病例中,用欧加农检测法检测到了HDAg,但用Deltassay检测法未检测到。这些差异与丁型肝炎病毒感染类型无关。在发病第4周后采集的这些患者的所有样本,用欧加农和雅培抗-HD检测法均检测到抗-HD呈阳性。这些数据反映了Deltassay检测法缺乏敏感性。用欧加农检测法检测时,HDAg和抗-HD从未同时出现。相反,在欧加农检测法检测HDAg呈阳性的28份血清中,有10份血清用雅培检测法检测抗-HD也呈阳性。我们怀疑,雅培公司推荐的检测程序(一步竞争性检测法)可能在血清中的HDAg与试剂盒中过氧化物酶标记的抗-HD发生反应时产生了抗-HD假阳性结果。为了确定HDAg和抗-HD同时存在的特异性,用雅培抗-HD检测法对这10份血清重新进行检测,但采用了改良的两步法,避免血清与标记抗体接触。6份血清采用第二种检测程序得到阴性结果,表明标准检测程序出现了抗-HD假反应。4份血清两种检测程序均得到阳性结果,表明HDAg和抗-HD同时存在。总之,发现检测HDAg对急性丁型肝炎病毒感染的早期诊断非常方便。抗-HD血清学转换可用于发病2至5周后的晚期诊断。然而,在HDAg阳性血清中,采用一步竞争性检测法获得的抗-HD结果必须谨慎解读。