Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Neurocritical Care Unit, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Dec;129(12):2602-2612. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Cushing response (CR) is categorized. Wavelet transform (WT) and decision tree (DT) are utilized to analyze physiological signals from neurocritical patients. A warning model is built for recognition of CR, real-time evaluation of intracranial condition and prediction of neurological outcome.
Physiological signals of neurocritical patients are preprocessed by WT and compressed by linear regression. An algorithm labels each segment as pathological, physiological, negative or uncertain CR. The DT identifies CR. Continuous data input to the established DT predicts condition at that moment and following outcome.
From 33 neurocritical patients, 422,524 sets of physiological signals were collected. The cross-validation scores of DT ranged from 0.562 to 0.579 with averaged accuracy rate 60.6% (3.5-98.1%). The model correctly predicted the outcome of the training group, 87.9% in accuracy. The ratios of pathological CR were 9.3 ± 16.6%, 74.2 ± 29.7% and 99.7 ± 0.3% in patients of good, coma and death groups, respectively. The prediction accuracy for a test set of 103 patients reached 81.6%.
Cushing response categorization helps in identifying critical conditions and predicting outcome.
A novel concept of four categories of Cushing response is proposed to represent broader ranges of intracranial change.
对库欣反应(CR)进行分类。利用小波变换(WT)和决策树(DT)分析神经危重症患者的生理信号。建立预警模型,用于识别 CR、实时评估颅内情况和预测神经功能预后。
通过 WT 对神经危重症患者的生理信号进行预处理,并通过线性回归进行压缩。算法将每个片段标记为病理性、生理性、阴性或不确定的 CR。DT 识别 CR。连续输入到建立的 DT 的数据预测此时的情况和随后的结果。
从 33 名神经危重症患者中采集了 422524 组生理信号。DT 的交叉验证评分范围为 0.562 至 0.579,平均准确率为 60.6%(3.5-98.1%)。该模型正确预测了训练组的结果,准确率为 87.9%。在预后良好、昏迷和死亡组的患者中,病理性 CR 的比例分别为 9.3±16.6%、74.2±29.7%和 99.7±0.3%。对 103 例测试集患者的预测准确率达到 81.6%。
CR 分类有助于识别危急情况和预测结果。
提出了一种新的 CR 四类分类概念,以代表更广泛的颅内变化范围。