Wood Katherine, Simons Daniel J
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1629-1.
Surreptitious online measures can reveal the processing of stimuli that people do not report noticing or cannot describe. People seem to glean everything from low-level Gestalt grouping information to semantic meaning from unattended and unreported stimuli, and this information seems capable of influencing performance and of priming semantic judgments. Moore and Egeth (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352, 1997) provided evidence that judgments about the lengths of two lines were influenced by the grouping of background dots, even when subjects did not notice the pattern the dots formed. Mack and Rock (1998) reported that subjects could be primed to complete a stem with a word to which they were inattentionally blind. In this registered report, we replicated these two classic findings using large online samples (Ns = 260 and 448), finding support for the influence of grouping despite inattentional blindness, but not for word-stem priming.
秘密的在线测量方法能够揭示人们未报告注意到或无法描述的刺激处理过程。人们似乎能从低层次的格式塔分组信息到未被注意和未报告的刺激的语义含义中获取所有信息,而且这些信息似乎能够影响表现并启动语义判断。摩尔和埃格思(《实验心理学杂志:人类知觉与表现》,第23卷,第339 - 352页,1997年)提供了证据,表明即使受试者没有注意到背景点形成的图案,对两条线长度的判断也会受到背景点分组的影响。麦克和罗克(1998年)报告称,受试者可能会被启动,用一个他们未注意到的词来完成词干填空。在这份预注册报告中,我们使用大量在线样本(N分别为260和448)复制了这两个经典发现,发现尽管存在无意视盲,分组仍有影响,但词干启动效应不成立。