Suppr超能文献

无意视盲中的无意识加工:对摩尔和埃格思(1997年)以及麦克和罗克(1998年)研究的重复

Processing without noticing in inattentional blindness: A replication of Moore and Egeth (1997) and Mack and Rock (1998).

作者信息

Wood Katherine, Simons Daniel J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1629-1.

Abstract

Surreptitious online measures can reveal the processing of stimuli that people do not report noticing or cannot describe. People seem to glean everything from low-level Gestalt grouping information to semantic meaning from unattended and unreported stimuli, and this information seems capable of influencing performance and of priming semantic judgments. Moore and Egeth (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352, 1997) provided evidence that judgments about the lengths of two lines were influenced by the grouping of background dots, even when subjects did not notice the pattern the dots formed. Mack and Rock (1998) reported that subjects could be primed to complete a stem with a word to which they were inattentionally blind. In this registered report, we replicated these two classic findings using large online samples (Ns = 260 and 448), finding support for the influence of grouping despite inattentional blindness, but not for word-stem priming.

摘要

秘密的在线测量方法能够揭示人们未报告注意到或无法描述的刺激处理过程。人们似乎能从低层次的格式塔分组信息到未被注意和未报告的刺激的语义含义中获取所有信息,而且这些信息似乎能够影响表现并启动语义判断。摩尔和埃格思(《实验心理学杂志:人类知觉与表现》,第23卷,第339 - 352页,1997年)提供了证据,表明即使受试者没有注意到背景点形成的图案,对两条线长度的判断也会受到背景点分组的影响。麦克和罗克(1998年)报告称,受试者可能会被启动,用一个他们未注意到的词来完成词干填空。在这份预注册报告中,我们使用大量在线样本(N分别为260和448)复制了这两个经典发现,发现尽管存在无意视盲,分组仍有影响,但词干启动效应不成立。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验