Pierce Doris R, Doma Kenji, Raiff Hayleigh, Golledge Jonathan, Leicht Anthony S
Sport & Exercise Science, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Sport & Exercise Science, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Front Physiol. 2018 Oct 17;9:1468. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01468. eCollection 2018.
Exercise mode has been reported to be an important determinant of arterial stiffness and wave reflection changes following a brief bout of exercise with inconsistent results to date. This study examined the impact of exercise mode on arterial stiffness and pressure wave measures following acute aerobic exercise (AER), resistance exercise (RES), and a control (CON) condition with no exercise. In a randomized, cross-over, repeated measures design, 21 healthy adult males (26.7 ± 7.2 years) undertook three experimental intervention sessions: AER (30-min cycle ergometry at 70-75% maximum heart rate), RES (3 × 10 repetitions of six upper and lower body exercises at 80-90% of 10-repetition maximum) and CON (30-min seated rest). Measures of arterial stiffness and pressure waves, such as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), augmentation index (AIx), AIx corrected for heart rate of 75 (AIx75), and forward wave (Pf), backward wave (Pb) and reflection magnitude, were assessed at Rest and at 10-min intervals for 60 min after the intervention sessions. Comparisons between interventions and over time were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's tests. No significant differences in cf-PWV were noted between the three interventions at rest or post-intervention. However, RES led to significantly greater post-intervention AIx, AIx75, Pf, and Pb compared to AER and CON with AIx75 also remaining significantly elevated throughout the post-intervention period. In contrast, AER resulted in a brief, significant elevation of AIx75 and no change in cf-PWV, Pf, Pb, and reflection magnitude. Exercise mode, specifically RES and AER, significantly influenced the time course of pressure wave reflection responses following a brief bout of exercise in healthy adult males. Distinct adjustments during exercise including changes in blood pressure and vasomotor tone may be key modulators of post-exercise arterial function. Identification of modal differences may assist in understanding the impact of exercise on cardiovascular function and the mechanisms by which exercise benefits vascular health.
据报道,运动模式是短暂运动后动脉僵硬度和波反射变化的一个重要决定因素,但迄今为止结果并不一致。本研究考察了急性有氧运动(AER)、抗阻运动(RES)以及无运动的对照(CON)条件下,运动模式对动脉僵硬度和压力波指标的影响。在一项随机、交叉、重复测量设计中,21名健康成年男性(26.7±7.2岁)进行了三次实验干预:AER(以最大心率的70 - 75%进行30分钟的自行车测力计运动)、RES(对上下半身的六项运动进行3组,每组10次重复,强度为10次重复最大值的80 - 90%)和CON(30分钟的坐姿休息)。在休息时以及干预后60分钟内,每隔10分钟评估动脉僵硬度和压力波指标,如颈股脉搏波速度(cf - PWV)、增强指数(AIx)、心率校正为75时的增强指数(AIx75)、前向波(Pf)、反向波(Pb)和反射幅度。通过重复测量方差分析和Tukey检验评估干预之间以及随时间的比较。在休息时或干预后,三种干预之间的cf - PWV没有显著差异。然而,与AER和CON相比,RES导致干预后AIx、AIx75、Pf和Pb显著更高,且AIx75在整个干预后期间也显著升高。相比之下,AER导致AIx75短暂显著升高,而cf - PWV、Pf、Pb和反射幅度没有变化。运动模式,特别是RES和AER,显著影响了健康成年男性短暂运动后压力波反射反应的时间进程。运动期间包括血压和血管运动张力变化在内的不同调节可能是运动后动脉功能的关键调节因素。识别模式差异可能有助于理解运动对心血管功能的影响以及运动有益于血管健康的机制。