Suppr超能文献

Comparative study of cephalexin hydrochloride and cephalexin monohydrate in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.

作者信息

Kumar A, Murray D L, Hanna C B, Kreindler T G, Jacobson K D, Bundy J M, Waxman K, Finnerty E F, Folan D W, Drucker W R

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1317.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Jun;32(6):882-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.6.882.

Abstract

In two prospective, randomized multicenter double-blind studies with a dosage of either 250 mg given four times a day (study A) or 500 mg given two times a day (study B), the comparative efficacy and safety of cephalexin hydrochloride (LY061188; Keftab) and cephalexin monohydrate (Keflex) for treatment of skin and soft tissue infections were determined. In study A, 97 patients received cephalexin hydrochloride and 101 patients received cephalexin monohydrate. In study B, 75 patients received cephalexin hydrochloride and 70 patients received cephalexin monohydrate. Diagnoses included abscesses, cellulitis, wound infections, and infected dermatitis, and were comparable in the different treatment groups. Pathogens were isolated from 82% of patients enrolled; the majority of isolates were of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, other staphylococcal species, and a few gram-negative bacteria. In study A, 68 of 71 (95.7%) evaluable patients who received cephalexin hydrochloride responded satisfactorily; 73 of 81 (90%) patients who received cephalexin monohydrate also responded satisfactorily. In study B, 56 of 58 (96.5%) evaluable patients who received cephalexin hydrochloride responded satisfactorily; 47 of 50 (94%) patients who received cephalexin monohydrate also responded satisfactorily. An adverse clinical event leading to discontinuation of the treatment drug developed in 17 of 343 (4.95%) patients in both studies. No differences were noted between the two drugs. Skin eruptions, pruritus, and mild gastrointestinal symptoms were the common adverse effects. These data suggest that cephalexin hydrochloride, a new formulation of cephalexin, is a safe and effective antimicrobial agent for treatment of a variety of skin and subcutaneous infections in a dosage of either 250 mg four times a day or 500 mg twice a day.

摘要

相似文献

3
Soft tissue infections in the emergency department: the case for the use of 'simple' antibiotics.
South Med J. 1991 Nov;84(11):1313-5. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199111000-00005.
7
Cefadroxil in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1982 Sep;10 Suppl B:143-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/10.suppl_b.143.
8
Azithromycin compared with cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Am J Med. 1991 Sep 12;91(3A):36S-39S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90400-r.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions for impetigo.脓疱病的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD003261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003261.pub3.

本文引用的文献

2
Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections: a comparison of cephalexin and dicloxacillin.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983 Feb;8(2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(83)70020-4.
5
Practical aspects of bacterial skin infections in children.儿童细菌性皮肤感染的实际问题。
Pediatr Dermatol. 1985 Jul;2(4):255-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1985.tb00463.x.
6
Skin and soft tissue infections: pharmacologic approaches.
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 May-Jun;4(3):336-41. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198505000-00051.
8
Antibacterial therapy.抗菌治疗。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986 Apr;14(4):535-48. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(86)80441-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验