National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Nanoscale. 2018 Dec 21;10(47):22270-22279. doi: 10.1039/c8nr06668j. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Reported reaction kinetics of metal nanoparticles in natural and engineered systems commonly have used proxy measurements to infer chemical transformations, but extension of these methods to complex media has proven difficult. Here, we compare the sulfidation rate of AgNPs using two ion selective electrode (ISE)-based methods, which rely on either (i) direct measurement of free sulfide, or (ii) monitor the free Ag available in solution over time in the presence of sulfide species. Most experiments were carried out in moderately hard reconstituted water at pH 7 containing fulvic acid or humic acid, which represented a broad set of known interferences in ISE. Distinct differences in the measured rates were observed between the two proxy-based methods and details of the divergent results are discussed. The two ISE based methods were then compared to direct monitoring of AgNP chemical conversion to AgS using synchrotron-based in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD). Using XRD, distinct rates from both ISE-based technique were observed, which demonstrated that ISE measurements alone are inadequate to discriminate both the rate and extent of AgNP sulfidation. XRD rate data elucidated previously unidentified reaction regimes that were associated with AgNP coating (PVP and citrate acid) and NOM components, which provided new mechanistic insight into metallic NP processing. In general, the extent of AgS formation was inversely proportional to surface coverage of the initial AgNP. Overall, methods to determine reaction kinetics of nanomaterials in increasingly complex media and heterogeneous size distributions to improve NP-based design and performance will require similar approaches.
在自然和工程系统中,金属纳米粒子的反应动力学通常使用代理测量来推断化学转化,但这些方法在复杂介质中的扩展已被证明具有挑战性。在这里,我们比较了两种基于离子选择性电极 (ISE) 的方法对 AgNPs 硫化速率的影响,这两种方法都依赖于 (i) 直接测量游离的硫化物,或 (ii) 监测在硫化物存在下溶液中游离的 Ag 随时间的变化。大多数实验在含有富里酸或腐殖酸的中等硬度再水合水中进行,这代表了 ISE 中已知的广泛干扰物。在两种基于代理的方法之间观察到测量速率存在明显差异,并讨论了结果的细节。然后将这两种基于 ISE 的方法与使用同步辐射原位 X 射线衍射 (XRD) 直接监测 AgNP 化学转化为 AgS 的方法进行了比较。使用 XRD,从两种 ISE 技术都观察到了不同的速率,这表明单独使用 ISE 测量不足以区分 AgNP 硫化的速率和程度。XRD 速率数据阐明了以前未识别的反应区,这些反应区与 AgNP 涂层 (PVP 和柠檬酸) 和 NOM 成分有关,为金属 NP 处理提供了新的机制见解。一般来说,AgS 形成的程度与初始 AgNP 的表面覆盖率成反比。总的来说,为了在日益复杂的介质和不均匀的尺寸分布中确定纳米材料的反应动力学,以提高基于 NP 的设计和性能,将需要类似的方法。