• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父母教养方式与青少年反应性和主动性暴力:来自西班牙的证据。

Parenting Style and Reactive and Proactive Adolescent Violence: Evidence from Spain.

机构信息

Departamento de Psicología Social, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Blasco Ibáñez, 13., 46010 Valencia, Spain.

Departamento de Psicología de la Salud, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Avda. De la Universidad s/n, Edificio Altamira, 03202 Elche (Alicante), Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 24;15(12):2634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122634.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15122634
PMID:30477247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6313543/
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyze the relationship between the parenting styles-authoritative, indulgent, authoritarian, and neglectful-and reactive and proactive school violence among peers. These analyses were also performed by sex and age groups. The sample consisted of 2399 Spanish adolescents (50.2% male), aged between 12 and 18 years, mean (M) = 14.69, standard deviation () = 1.82. A multivariate analisys of variance (MANOVA, 4 × 2 × 2) was applied, considering parenting style, sex, and age group (12⁻14 and 15⁻18 years) as independent variables to analyze the possible effects of interaction. Reactive, proactive, and pure violence were the dependent variables. The results showed the main effects of parenting styles, sex, and age, as well as an interaction between sex, age, and parenting styles. The interpretation of the findings suggested that the authoritarian parenting style was related to greater engagement in proactive and reactive violent behaviors. In relation to the effect of the interaction between sex, age, and parenting styles, it was observed that adolescents from indulgent families, of both sexes and in any of the studied age groups, obtained lower scores in proactive violence. The discussion highlights the importance of affection and warmth for well-adjusted children's behavior.

摘要

本研究旨在分析父母教养方式(权威型、纵容型、专制型和忽视型)与同伴间反应性和主动性校园暴力之间的关系。这些分析还按性别和年龄组进行。样本由 2399 名西班牙青少年(50.2%为男性)组成,年龄在 12 至 18 岁之间,平均(M)= 14.69,标准差()= 1.82。采用多元方差分析(MANOVA,4×2×2),将父母教养方式、性别和年龄组(12⁻14 岁和 15⁻18 岁)作为自变量,分析可能存在的交互作用影响。反应性、主动性和单纯性暴力是因变量。结果显示,父母教养方式、性别和年龄均存在主效应,以及性别、年龄和父母教养方式之间存在交互作用。研究结果表明,专制型教养方式与更多的主动性和反应性暴力行为有关。关于性别、年龄和父母教养方式之间交互作用的影响,观察到来自纵容家庭的青少年,无论性别和研究中的任何年龄组,在主动性暴力方面的得分都较低。讨论强调了情感温暖对儿童行为适应的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/6313543/451f42522de0/ijerph-15-02634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/6313543/451f42522de0/ijerph-15-02634-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1eb7/6313543/451f42522de0/ijerph-15-02634-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Parenting Style and Reactive and Proactive Adolescent Violence: Evidence from Spain.父母教养方式与青少年反应性和主动性暴力:来自西班牙的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 24;15(12):2634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122634.
2
Child-To-Parent Violence: Which Parenting Style Is More Protective? A Study with Spanish Adolescents.儿童对父母暴力:哪种教养方式更具保护性?一项针对西班牙青少年的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 12;16(8):1320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081320.
3
Alcohol use and abuse and motivations for drinking and non-drinking among Spanish adolescents: do we know enough when we know parenting style?西班牙青少年的饮酒和滥用问题以及饮酒和不饮酒的动机:当我们了解到父母教养方式时,我们是否已经足够了解?
Psychol Health. 2020 Jun;35(6):645-664. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1675660. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
4
Which parenting style is more protective against adolescent substance use? Evidence within the European context.哪种养育方式对青少年使用毒品更具保护作用?欧洲背景下的证据。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.705. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
5
Raising Spanish Children With an Antisocial Tendency: Do We Know What the Optimal Parenting Style Is?培养具有反社会倾向的西班牙儿童:我们是否知道最佳的育儿方式?
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):6117-6144. doi: 10.1177/0886260518818426. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
Parental Style, Dating Violence and Gender.父母教养方式、约会暴力与性别。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 30;16(15):2722. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152722.
7
[Parenting style in Spanish parents with children aged 6 to 14].[西班牙有6至14岁孩子的父母的育儿方式]
Psicothema. 2012;24(3):371-6.
8
Raising Children with Poor School Performance: Parenting Styles and Short- and Long-Term Consequences for Adolescent and Adult Development.培养学业表现不佳的孩子:教养方式及其对青少年和成人发展的短期和长期影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 27;16(7):1089. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071089.
9
A Third Emerging Stage for the Current Digital Society? Optimal Parenting Styles in Spain, the United States, Germany, and Brazil.当前数字社会的第三个新兴阶段?西班牙、美国、德国和巴西的最佳育儿方式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 2;16(13):2333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132333.
10
Early Family Experiences, Drug Use, and Psychosocial Adjustment across the Life Span: Is Parental Strictness Always a Protective Factor?早期家庭经历、药物使用与整个生命周期中的心理社会适应:父母的严格是否总是保护因素?
Psychosoc Interv. 2024 Jan 2;33(1):15-27. doi: 10.5093/pi2023a16. eCollection 2024 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Raising Generation Z Children in China: Parenting Styles and Psychosocial Adjustment.在中国养育Z世代儿童:育儿方式与心理社会适应
Psychosoc Interv. 2025 May 9;34(2):103-115. doi: 10.5093/pi2025a9. eCollection 2025 May.
2
The Associations Between Parenting and Bullying Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童和青少年养育方式与欺凌行为之间的关联:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Youth Adolesc. 2025 Apr;54(4):928-954. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-02108-1. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
3
The relationship between perceived parenting styles and anxiety in adolescents.

本文引用的文献

1
15-year-old tobacco and alcohol abstainers in a drier generation: Characteristics and lifestyle factors in a Norwegian cross-sectional sample.15 岁的干燥世代烟草和酒精禁欲者:挪威横断面样本的特征和生活方式因素。
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Jun;47(4):439-445. doi: 10.1177/1403494818770301. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
Aggressive behavior in adolescence as a predictor of personal, family, and school adjustment problems.青春期的攻击性行为是个人、家庭和学校适应问题的预测指标。
Psicothema. 2018 Feb;30(1):66-73. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.294.
3
Gradient of association between parenting styles and patterns of drug use in adolescence: A latent class analysis.
青少年感知到的教养方式与焦虑之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 27;14(1):25623. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77268-y.
4
Investigating the effects of autonomy-supportive parenting practices on Italian young adolescent students' motivation to defend victims of bullying: findings on the mediating roles of reactance, depression, anxiety, and stress.探究自主性支持型育儿方式对意大利青少年学生保护受欺凌受害者动机的影响:关于反抗、抑郁、焦虑和压力的中介作用的研究结果
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1156807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1156807. eCollection 2023.
5
Parenting Styles and Self-Esteem in Adolescent Cybervictims and Cyberaggressors: Self-Esteem as a Mediator Variable.青少年网络受害者和网络攻击者的养育方式与自尊:自尊作为中介变量
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;9(12):1795. doi: 10.3390/children9121795.
6
The Moderating Role of Surgency, Behavioral Inhibition, Negative Emotionality and Effortful Control in the Relationship between Parenting Style and Children's Reactive and Proactive Aggression.外向性、行为抑制、负性情绪和努力控制在教养方式与儿童反应性攻击和主动性攻击关系中的调节作用
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;9(1):104. doi: 10.3390/children9010104.
7
The Complex Nature of School Violence: Attitudes Toward Aggression, Empathy and Involvement Profiles in Violence.校园暴力的复杂本质:对暴力行为的攻击性态度、同理心及参与模式
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 May 19;14:575-586. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S313831. eCollection 2021.
8
Academic Competence, Teacher-Student Relationship, and Violence and Victimisation in Adolescents: The Classroom Climate as a Mediator.学业能力、师生关系与青少年的暴力和受害行为:课堂氛围的中介作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 28;18(3):1163. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031163.
9
Self and Nature: Parental Socialization, Self-Esteem, and Environmental Values in Spanish Adolescents.自我与自然:西班牙青少年的父母社会化、自尊与环境价值观。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):3732. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103732.
10
Teen Dating Violence, Sexism, and Resilience: A Multivariate Analysis.青少年恋爱暴力、性别歧视与适应力:多变量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 13;17(8):2652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082652.
教养方式与青少年药物使用模式之间的关联梯度:潜类分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Nov 1;180:272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
4
Stress, competence, and parental educational styles in victims and aggressors of bullying and cyberbullying.受欺凌和网络欺凌受害者及欺凌者的压力、能力与父母教育方式。
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):335-340. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.258.
5
English Validation of the Parental Socialization Scale-ESPA29.父母社会化量表-ESPA29的英文验证。
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00865. eCollection 2017.
6
Associations of parenting dimensions and styles with externalizing problems of children and adolescents: An updated meta-analysis.养育维度和方式与儿童及青少年外化问题的关联:一项更新的元分析。
Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):873-932. doi: 10.1037/dev0000295.
7
Parenting styles and bullying. The mediating role of parental psychological aggression and physical punishment.育儿方式与欺凌行为。父母心理攻击和身体惩罚的中介作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2016 Jan;51:132-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
8
Family predictors of continuity and change in social and physical aggression from ages 9 to 18.9至18岁期间社会攻击和身体攻击连续性及变化的家庭预测因素
Aggress Behav. 2014 Sep-Oct;40(5):421-39. doi: 10.1002/ab.21535. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
Which parenting style is more protective against adolescent substance use? Evidence within the European context.哪种养育方式对青少年使用毒品更具保护作用?欧洲背景下的证据。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.705. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
10
Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim: a meta-analysis study.养育行为与成为受害者及欺凌者/受害者的风险:一项荟萃分析研究
Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Dec;37(12):1091-108. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Apr 25.