Suppr超能文献

粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病。

Fecal transplantation for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

作者信息

Imdad Aamer, Nicholson Maribeth R, Tanner-Smith Emily E, Zackular Joseph P, Gomez-Duarte Oscar G, Beaulieu Dawn B, Acra Sari

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Karjoo Family Center for Pediatric Gastroenterology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 725, Irving Street, Suit 501, Syracuse, NY, USA, 13210.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 13;11(11):CD012774. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012774.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, relapsing disease of the gastrointestinal tract that is thought to be associated with a complex interplay between microbes and the immune system, leading to an abnormal inflammatory response in genetically susceptible individuals. Dysbiosis, characterized by the alteration of the composition of the resident commensal bacteria in a host compared to healthy individuals, is thought to play a major role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), two subtypes of IBD. There is growing interest to correct the underlying dysbiosis through the use of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of IBD.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of FMT for the treatment of IBD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register databases from inception to 19 March 2018. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN metaRegister of Controlled Trials, and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only randomized trials or non-randomized studies with a control arm were considered for inclusion. Adults or pediatric participants with UC or CD were eligible for inclusion. Eligible interventions were FMT defined as the administration of fecal material containing distal gut microbiota from a healthy donor to the gastrointestinal tract of a someone with UC or CD. The comparison group included participants who did not receive FMT and were given placebo, autologous FMT, or no intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened the titles and extracted data from the included studies. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess study bias. The primary outcomes were induction of clinical remission, clinical relapse, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, endoscopic remission and endoscopic response, quality of life scores, laboratory measures of inflammation, withdrawals, and microbiome outcomes. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Random-effects meta-analysis models were used to synthesize effect sizes across trials. The overall certainty of the evidence supporting the primary and selected secondary outcomes was rated using the GRADE criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Four studies with a total of 277 participants were included. These studies assessed the efficacy of FMT for treatment of UC in adults; no eligible trials were found for the treatment of CD. Most participants had mild to moderate UC. Two studies were conducted in Australia, one study was conducted in Canada, and another in the Netherlands. Three of the included studies administered FMT via the rectal route and one study administered FMT via the nasoduodenal route. Three studies were rated as low risk of bias. One study (abstract publication) was rated as unclear risk of bias. Combined results from four studies (277 participants) suggest that FMT increases rates of clinical remission by two-fold in patients with UC compared to controls. At 8 weeks, 37% (52/140) of FMT participants achieved remission compared to 18% (24/137) of control participants (RR 2.03, 95 % CI, 1.07 to 3.86; I² = 50%; low certainty evidence). One study reported data on relapse at 12 weeks among participants who achieved remission. None of the FMT participants (0/7) relapsed at 12 weeks compared to 20% of control participants (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.02 to 4.98, 17 participants, very low certainty evidence). It is unclear whether there is a difference in serious adverse event rates between the intervention and control groups. Seven per cent (10/140) of FMT participants had a serious adverse event compared to 5% (7/137) of control participants (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.55 to 3.58; 4 studies; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Serious adverse events included worsening of UC necessitating intravenous steroids or surgery; infection such as Clostridium difficile and cytomegalovirus, small bowel perforation and pneumonia. Adverse events were reported by two studies and the pooled data did not show any difference between the study groups. Seventy-eight per cent (50/64) of FMT participants had an adverse event compared to 75% (49/65) of control participants (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.31; I² = 31%; moderate certainty evidence). Common adverse events included abdominal pain, nausea, flatulence, bloating, upper respiratory tract infection, headaches, dizziness, and fever. Four studies reported on clinical response at 8 weeks. Forty-nine per cent (68/140) of FMT participants had a clinical response compared to 28% (38/137) of control participants (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.95, I² = 50%, low certainty evidence). Endoscopic remission at 8 weeks was reported by three studies and the combined results favored FMT over the control group. Thirty per cent (35/117) of FMT participants achieved endoscopic remission compared to 10% (11/112) of control participants (RR 2.96, 95 % CI 1.60 to 5.48, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Fecal microbiota transplantation may increase the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission in UC. However, the number of identified studies was small and the quality of evidence was low. There is uncertainty about the rate of serious adverse events. As a result, no solid conclusions can be drawn at this time. Additional high-quality studies are needed to further define the optimal parameters of FMT in terms of route, frequency, volume, preparation, type of donor and the type and disease severity. No studies assessed efficacy of FMT for induction of remission in CD or in pediatric participants. In addition, no studies assessed long-term maintenance of remission in UC or CD. Future studies are needed to address the therapeutic benefit of FMT in CD and the long-term FMT-mediated maintenance of remission in UC or CD.

摘要

背景

炎症性肠病(IBD)是一种胃肠道的慢性复发性疾病,被认为与微生物和免疫系统之间的复杂相互作用有关,导致基因易感个体出现异常炎症反应。与健康个体相比,以宿主中常驻共生细菌组成改变为特征的生态失调被认为在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)这两种IBD亚型的发病机制中起主要作用。通过使用粪便微生物群移植(FMT)来纠正潜在的生态失调以治疗IBD的兴趣日益增加。

目的

本系统评价的目的是评估FMT治疗IBD的疗效和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Cochrane IBD小组专业注册数据库,检索时间从建库至2018年3月19日。我们还检索了ClinicalTrials.gov、ISRCTN对照试验元注册库和会议论文引用索引。

入选标准

仅纳入随机试验或有对照臂的非随机研究。患有UC或CD的成人或儿童参与者符合纳入条件。符合条件的干预措施为FMT,定义为将含有来自健康供体的远端肠道微生物群的粪便物质给予患有UC或CD的人的胃肠道。比较组包括未接受FMT且接受安慰剂、自体FMT或未干预的参与者。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立筛选标题并从纳入研究中提取数据。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究偏倚。主要结局为诱导临床缓解率、临床复发率和严重不良事件。次要结局包括临床反应、内镜缓解和内镜反应、生活质量评分、炎症实验室指标、退出研究情况和微生物组结局。我们计算二分结局的风险比(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)以及连续结局的均值差和95%CI。采用随机效应荟萃分析模型综合各试验的效应量。使用GRADE标准对支持主要结局和选定次要结局的证据的总体确定性进行评级。

主要结果

纳入了4项研究,共277名参与者。这些研究评估了FMT治疗成人UC的疗效;未找到治疗CD的符合条件的试验。大多数参与者患有轻度至中度UC。两项研究在澳大利亚进行,一项研究在加拿大进行,另一项在荷兰进行。纳入的三项研究通过直肠途径给予FMT,一项研究通过鼻十二指肠途径给予FMT。三项研究被评为低偏倚风险。一项研究(摘要发表)被评为偏倚风险不明确。四项研究(277名参与者)的综合结果表明,与对照组相比,FMT使UC患者的临床缓解率提高了两倍。在8周时,37%(52/140)的FMT参与者实现缓解,而对照组为18%(24/137)(RR 2.03,95%CI,1.07至3.86;I² = 50%;低确定性证据)。一项研究报告了缓解参与者在12周时的复发数据。FMT参与者在12周时无一例复发(0/7),而对照组为20%(RR 0.28,95%CI 0.02至4.98,17名参与者,极低确定性证据)。尚不清楚干预组和对照组之间严重不良事件发生率是否存在差异。7%(10/140)的FMT参与者发生严重不良事件,而对照组为5%(7/137)(RR 1.40,95%CI 0.55至3.58;4项研究;I² = 0%;低确定性证据)。严重不良事件包括UC恶化需要静脉使用类固醇或手术;感染如艰难梭菌和巨细胞病毒、小肠穿孔和肺炎。两项研究报告了不良事件,汇总数据未显示研究组之间有任何差异。78%(50/64)的FMT参与者发生不良事件,而对照组为75%(49/65)(RR 1.

相似文献

1
Fecal transplantation for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 13;11(11):CD012774. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012774.pub2.
2
Fecal transplantation for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.粪便移植治疗炎症性肠病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 25;4(4):CD012774. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012774.pub3.
3
Cannabis for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.大麻用于治疗溃疡性结肠炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 8;11(11):CD012954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012954.pub2.
4
Cannabis for the treatment of Crohn's disease.大麻用于治疗克罗恩病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 8;11(11):CD012853. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012853.pub2.
5
Helminth therapy (worms) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel disease.蠕虫疗法(使用蠕虫)诱导炎症性肠病缓解
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 20;2014(1):CD009400. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009400.pub2.
6
Antibiotics for induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.用于诱导和维持克罗恩病缓解的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 7;2(2):CD012730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012730.pub2.
7
Anti-IL-12/23p40 antibodies for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.用于维持克罗恩病缓解的抗IL-12/23 p40抗体
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD012804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012804.pub2.
8
Enteral nutrition for maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.肠内营养用于维持克罗恩病的缓解
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 11;8(8):CD005984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005984.pub3.

引用本文的文献

4
A practical approach to positioning therapies in ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎定位治疗的实用方法。
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 21;8(Suppl 2):S6-S14. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwae058. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
Review article: the human intestinal virome in health and disease.综述文章:健康与疾病中的人类肠道病毒组
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;46(9):800-815. doi: 10.1111/apt.14280. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验