Sakaura Hironobu, Ohnishi Atsunori, Yamagishi Akira, Ohwada Tetsuo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr;13(2):248-253. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0169. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
Retrospective cohort study.
We recently reported that when compared to posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using traditional pedicle screw fixation, PLIF with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation (CBT-PLIF) provided favorable clinical outcomes and reduced the incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment pathology, but resulted in relatively lower fusion rates. Since titanium-coated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages (TP) could improve and accelerate fusion status after CBT-PLIF, early fusion status was compared between CBT-PLIF using TP and carbon PEEK cages (CP).
A systematic review demonstrated that clinical studies at this early stage show similar fusion rates for TP compared to PEEK cages.
We studied 36 consecutive patients undergoing CBT-PLIF with TP (TP group) and 92 undergoing CBT-PLIF with CP (CP group). On multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography (MPR-CT) at 6 months postoperatively, vertebral endplate cysts (cyst signs) were evaluated and classified as diffuse or local cysts. Early fusion status was assessed by dynamic plain radiographs and MPR-CT at 1 year postoperatively.
The incidences of cyst signs, diffuse cysts, and early fusion rate in the TP and CP groups were 38.9% and 66.3% (p<0.01), 16.7% and 32.6% (p=0.07), and 83.3% and 79.3% (p>0.05), respectively. Combining the two groups, 22 of 36 patients with diffuse cysts had nonunion at 1-year follow-up, compared to only three of 92 patients with local cysts or without cyst signs (p<0.01).
Despite having fewer patients with endplate cysts at 6 months (a known risk factor for nonunion), the TP group had the same fusion rate as the CP group at 1-year follow-up. Thus, TP did not accelerate the fusion process after CBT-PLIF.
回顾性队列研究。
我们最近报道,与使用传统椎弓根螺钉固定的后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)相比,采用皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定的PLIF(CBT-PLIF)具有良好的临床效果,且降低了症状性相邻节段病变的发生率,但融合率相对较低。由于钛涂层聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器(TP)可改善并加速CBT-PLIF后的融合状态,因此比较了使用TP的CBT-PLIF与碳PEEK椎间融合器(CP)的早期融合状态。
一项系统评价表明,现阶段的临床研究显示TP与PEEK椎间融合器的融合率相似。
我们研究了36例连续接受使用TP的CBT-PLIF的患者(TP组)和92例接受使用CP的CBT-PLIF的患者(CP组)。术后6个月行多平面重建计算机断层扫描(MPR-CT),评估椎体终板囊肿(囊肿征象)并分为弥漫性或局限性囊肿。术后1年通过动态X线平片和MPR-CT评估早期融合状态。
TP组和CP组的囊肿征象、弥漫性囊肿发生率及早期融合率分别为38.9%和66.3%(p<0.01)、16.7%和32.6%(p=0.07)、83.3%和79.3%(p>0.05)。将两组合并后,36例有弥漫性囊肿的患者中有22例在1年随访时未融合,而92例有局限性囊肿或无囊肿征象的患者中只有3例未融合(p<0.01)。
尽管TP组术后6个月终板囊肿患者较少(这是已知的不融合危险因素),但在1年随访时其融合率与CP组相同。因此,TP并未加速CBT-PLIF后的融合进程。