Wang Guanzheng, Wang Rubin, Kong Wanzheng, Zhang Jianhai
2Institute for Cognitive Neurodynamics, School of Science, East China University of Science and Technology, Meilong Road 130, Shanghai, 200237 China.
1College of Computer Science, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Zhejiang, China.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2018 Dec;12(6):615-624. doi: 10.1007/s11571-018-9490-4. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
Advances in neurobiology suggest that neuronal response of the primary visual cortex to natural stimuli may be attributed to sparse approximation of images, encoding stimuli to activate specific neurons although the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. The responses of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to natural and random checkerboard stimuli were simulated using fast independent component analysis. The neuronal response to stimuli was measured using kurtosis and Treves-Rolls sparseness, and the kurtosis, lifetime and population sparseness were analyzed. RGCs exhibited significant lifetime sparseness in response to natural stimuli and random checkerboard stimuli. About 65 and 72% of RGCs do not fire all the time in response to natural and random checkerboard stimuli, respectively. Both kurtosis of single neurons and lifetime response of single neurons values were larger in the case of natural than in random checkerboard stimuli. The population of RGCs fire much less in response to random checkerboard stimuli than natural stimuli. However, kurtosis of population sparseness and population response of the entire neurons were larger with natural than random checkerboard stimuli. RGCs fire more sparsely in response to natural stimuli. Individual neurons fire at a low rate, while the occasional "burst" of neuronal population transmits information efficiently.
神经生物学的进展表明,初级视觉皮层对自然刺激的神经元反应可能归因于图像的稀疏逼近,即对刺激进行编码以激活特定神经元,尽管其潜在机制仍不清楚。使用快速独立成分分析模拟了视网膜神经节细胞(RGC)对自然和随机棋盘格刺激的反应。使用峰度和Treves-Rolls稀疏性来测量神经元对刺激的反应,并分析了峰度、寿命和群体稀疏性。RGC对自然刺激和随机棋盘格刺激表现出显著的寿命稀疏性。分别约有65%和72%的RGC在对自然和随机棋盘格刺激的反应中并非一直放电。在自然刺激的情况下,单个神经元的峰度和单个神经元的寿命反应值均大于随机棋盘格刺激。RGC群体对随机棋盘格刺激的放电比自然刺激少得多。然而,自然刺激下群体稀疏性的峰度和整个神经元的群体反应比随机棋盘格刺激更大。RGC对自然刺激的放电更稀疏。单个神经元放电率较低,而神经元群体偶尔的“爆发”能有效地传递信息。