• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前预测妇科恶性肿瘤手术后非居家出院。

Preoperatively predicting non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Feb;152(2):293-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.029
PMID:30497792
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Returning home after surgery is a desirable patient-centered outcome associated with decreased costs compared to non-home discharge. Our objective was to develop a preoperative risk-scoring model predicting non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy.

METHODS

Women who underwent surgery involving hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy from 2013 to 2015 were identified from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database. Patients were divided by discharge destination, and a multivariable logistic regression model was developed to create a nomogram to assign case-specific risk scores. The model was validated using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

RESULTS

Non-home discharge occurred in 3.1% of 2134 women. The proportion of non-home discharges did not differ by cancer diagnosis (uterine 3.5%, ovarian 2.5%, and cervical 1.6%, p = 0.2). Skilled nursing facilities were the most common non-home destination (68.2%). Among patients with comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease /dyspnea, arrhythmia, and history of deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism), non-home discharge was more common in women with 1 (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.4; p = 0.03) or ≥2 of these comorbidities (aOR 5.1; p = 0.003) compared to none. Non-home discharge was more common after laparotomy (aOR 6.7; p < 0.0001) than laparoscopy, and in those aged ≥70 years (aOR 3.4; p < 0.0001) with American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥ 3 (aOR 4.5; p = 0.0004) and dependent functional status (aOR 8.7; p < 0.0001). The model C-statistic was 0.89. When the model was applied to 4248 eligible patients from the NSQIP dataset, the C-statistic was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy was predicted with high accuracy in this retrospective analysis.

摘要

目的

与非出院相比,手术后回家是一种理想的以患者为中心的结果,可降低成本。我们的目标是建立一个预测妇科恶性肿瘤手术后非出院的术前风险评分模型。

方法

从密歇根州手术质量协作数据库中确定了 2013 年至 2015 年期间因妇科恶性肿瘤接受子宫切除术的女性患者。根据出院地点将患者分组,并建立多变量逻辑回归模型以创建分配特定病例风险评分的列线图。使用国家手术质量改进计划 (NSQIP) 数据库验证该模型。

结果

2134 名女性中有 3.1%的患者非出院。癌症诊断对非出院的比例没有影响(子宫癌 3.5%,卵巢癌 2.5%,宫颈癌 1.6%,p=0.2)。熟练护理设施是最常见的非出院目的地(68.2%)。在合并症患者(高血压、糖尿病、冠心病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病/呼吸困难、心律失常和深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞史)中,与无这些合并症的女性相比,有 1 种(调整后的优势比[aOR]3.4;p=0.03)或≥2 种合并症的女性非出院更为常见(aOR 5.1;p=0.003)。与腹腔镜手术相比,剖腹手术后非出院更为常见(aOR 6.7;p<0.0001),年龄≥70 岁(aOR 3.4;p<0.0001)的患者,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级≥3(aOR 4.5;p=0.0004)和依赖功能状态(aOR 8.7;p<0.0001)的患者也是如此。该模型的 C 统计量为 0.89。当该模型应用于来自 NSQIP 数据集的 4248 名合格患者时,C 统计量为 0.84(95%CI:0.79-0.89)。

结论

在这项回顾性分析中,妇科恶性肿瘤手术后非出院的预测具有很高的准确性。

相似文献

1
Preoperatively predicting non-home discharge after surgery for gynecologic malignancy.术前预测妇科恶性肿瘤手术后非居家出院。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Feb;152(2):293-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.029. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
2
Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Laparoscopic Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancy.妇科恶性肿瘤腹腔镜手术后静脉血栓栓塞的风险
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Nov-Dec;23(7):1057-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
3
The American College of Surgeon's surgical risk calculator's ability to predict disposition in older gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy.美国外科医师学会手术风险计算器预测老年妇科肿瘤患者行剖腹术的处置能力。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):618-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
4
Minority Race Predicts Treatment by Non-gynecologic Oncologists in Women with Gynecologic Cancer.少数族裔预测非妇科肿瘤医生对妇科癌症患者的治疗。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3685-3691. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6694-0. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
5
Predictors of 30-day readmission following hysterectomy for benign and malignant indications at a tertiary care academic medical center.在一家三级保健学术医疗中心,因良性和恶性指征行子宫切除术 30 天再入院的预测因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;214(5):607.e1-607.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.037. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
6
Impact of surgical approach and patient factors on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey scoring in gynecologic surgery.手术方式和患者因素对妇科手术患者医疗保健提供者和系统评估调查(HCAHPS)评分的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
7
Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.妇科肿瘤学中的单孔腹腔镜手术:单一机构的七年经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):610.e1-610.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
8
Predicting non-home discharge in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: External validation of a predictive model.预测上皮性卵巢癌患者非出院转归:预测模型的外部验证。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):129-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
Assessment of poor functional status and post-acute care needs following primary ovarian cancer debulking surgery.原发性卵巢癌肿瘤减灭术后功能状态不良和急性后期护理需求评估。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Feb;30(2):227-232. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000794. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
10
Surgical site infection in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer.妇科癌症手术患者的手术部位感染。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 May;24(4):779-86. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000126.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of diabetes on postoperative outcomes following hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病对子宫切除术后结局的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03835-8.
2
Non-home discharge in the octogenarian and nonagenarian colorectal cancer population: a retrospective cohort study.八旬及九旬结直肠癌患者的非家庭出院情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Apr 21;40(1):97. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04891-0.
3
A Chinese prospective cohort research developed and validated a risk prediction model for patients with cervical cancer.
一项中国前瞻性队列研究开发并验证了一种针对宫颈癌患者的风险预测模型。
Cancer Cell Int. 2025 Apr 13;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12935-025-03744-8.
4
Qualitative Interview Study of Gynecologic Oncologist Utilization of Recommended Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.妇科肿瘤学家对微创子宫切除术后推荐的同日出院的使用情况的定性访谈研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 30;12(7):1082. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071082.
5
Nomogram model for predicting postoperative survival of patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.预测IB-IIA期宫颈癌患者术后生存率的列线图模型
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):5559-5570. eCollection 2021.
6
Systematic review of prediction models for postacute care destination decision-making.系统评价急性后期护理目的地决策预测模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):176-186. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab197.
7
Challenges of Modeling Outcomes for Surgical Infections: A Word of Caution.手术感染结局建模面临的挑战:谨慎为之。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Jun;22(5):523-531. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.208. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
8
Risk factors predicting the loss of functional independence after obliterative procedures for pelvic organ prolapse.预测盆腔器官脱垂阻塞性手术后丧失功能独立性的风险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Feb;32(2):267-272. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04424-z. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
9
Preoperative Nomogram Predicts Non-home Discharge in Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.术前列线图预测胰十二指肠切除术患者非居家出院。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 May;25(5):1253-1260. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04689-1. Epub 2020 Jun 24.