Kent State University, Case Western Reserve University, United States.
Teachers College, Columbia University, United States.
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Aug;28:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) have made important contributions to resolving the global burden of mental illness. However, response rates are comparatively more modest for the distress disorders. Newer CBTs enriched with MBI components have emerged with promising findings for distress disorders but with a high degree of heterogeneity and, subsequently, an unclear path for determining the unique and synergistic contributions from CBTs and MBIs. We propose that one way to elucidate and improve upon this union is to identify common overarching principles (i.e. attention change; metacognitive change) that guide both approaches and to refine therapeutic processes to optimally reflect these common targets and their interplay (e.g. sequencing and dosing).
认知行为疗法(CBT)和正念为基础的干预(MBI)为解决全球精神疾病负担做出了重要贡献。然而,对于困扰性障碍,其反应率相对较低。新型 CBT 中加入 MBI 成分,对困扰性障碍有了有希望的发现,但存在很大的异质性,因此,对于确定 CBT 和 MBI 的独特和协同贡献的路径尚不明确。我们提出,阐明和改进这种结合的一种方法是确定指导这两种方法的共同基本原则(即注意力改变;元认知改变),并完善治疗过程,以最佳地反映这些共同目标及其相互作用(例如,顺序和剂量)。