Gradish Angela E, van der Steen Jozef, Scott-Dupree Cynthia D, Cabrera Ana R, Cutler G Christopher, Goulson Dave, Klein Olaf, Lehmann David M, Lückmann Johannes, O'Neill Bridget, Raine Nigel E, Sharma Bibek, Thompson Helen
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Environ Entomol. 2019 Feb 13;48(1):12-21. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy168.
To date, regulatory pesticide risk assessments have relied on the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as a surrogate test species for estimating the risk of pesticide exposure to all bee species. However, honey bees and non-Apis bees may differ in their susceptibility and exposure to pesticides. In 2017, a workshop ('Pesticide Exposure Assessment Paradigm for Non-Apis Bees') was held to assess if honey bee risk assessment frameworks are reflective of non-Apis bee pesticide exposure. In this article, we summarize the workshop discussions on bumble bees (Bombus spp.). We review the life history and foraging behavior of bumble bees and honey bees and discuss how these traits may influence routes and levels of exposure for both taxa. Overall, the major pesticide exposure routes for bumble bees and honey bees are similar; however, bumble bees face additional exposure routes (direct exposure of foraging queens and exposure of larvae and adults to soil residues). Furthermore, bumble bees may receive comparatively higher pesticide doses via contact or oral exposure. We conclude that honey bee pesticide risk assessments may not always be protective of bumble bees, especially queens, in terms of exposure. Data needed to reliably quantify pesticide exposure for bumble bees (e.g., food consumption rates, soil residue levels) are lacking. Addressing these knowledge gaps will be crucial before bumble bee exposure can be incorporated into the pesticide risk assessment process. Because bumble bees exhibit appreciable interspecific variation in colony and behavioral characteristics, data relevant to pesticide exposure should be generated for multiple species.
迄今为止,农药监管风险评估一直将蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)作为替代试验物种,用于估计农药暴露对所有蜜蜂物种的风险。然而,蜜蜂和非蜜蜂类蜜蜂在对农药的易感性和暴露程度上可能存在差异。2017年,举办了一次研讨会(“非蜜蜂类蜜蜂的农药暴露评估范式”),以评估蜜蜂风险评估框架是否反映了非蜜蜂类蜜蜂的农药暴露情况。在本文中,我们总结了关于熊蜂(熊蜂属)的研讨会讨论内容。我们回顾了熊蜂和蜜蜂的生活史及觅食行为,并讨论了这些特征如何可能影响这两个类群的暴露途径和暴露水平。总体而言,熊蜂和蜜蜂的主要农药暴露途径相似;然而,熊蜂面临额外的暴露途径(觅食蜂王的直接暴露以及幼虫和成虫对土壤残留物的暴露)。此外,熊蜂通过接触或口服暴露可能会接受相对较高剂量的农药。我们得出结论,就暴露而言,蜜蜂农药风险评估可能并不总是能保护熊蜂,尤其是蜂王。缺乏可靠量化熊蜂农药暴露所需的数据(例如食物消耗率、土壤残留水平)。在将熊蜂暴露纳入农药风险评估过程之前,填补这些知识空白至关重要。由于熊蜂在群体和行为特征方面表现出明显的种间差异,应针对多个物种生成与农药暴露相关的数据。