Boyle Natalie K, Pitts-Singer Theresa L, Abbott John, Alix Anne, Cox-Foster Diana L, Hinarejos Silvia, Lehmann David M, Morandin Lora, O'Neill Bridget, Raine Nigel E, Singh Rajwinder, Thompson Helen M, Williams Neal M, Steeger Thomas
USDA-ARS-PWA, Pollinating Insects-Biology, Management, Systematics Research, Logan, UT, USA.
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Environ Entomol. 2019 Feb 13;48(1):4-11. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy103.
Current pesticide risk assessment practices use the honey bee, Apis mellifera L., as a surrogate to characterize the likelihood of chemical exposure of a candidate pesticide for all bee species. Bees make up a diverse insect group that provides critical pollination services to both managed and wild ecosystems. Accordingly, they display a diversity of behaviors and vary greatly in their lifestyles and phenologies, such as their timing of emergence, degree of sociality, and foraging and nesting behaviors. Some of these factors may lead to disparate or variable routes of exposure when compared to honey bees. For those that possess life histories that are distinct from A. mellifera, further risk assessments may be warranted. In January 2017, 40 bee researchers, representative of regulatory agencies, academia, and agrochemical industries, gathered to discuss the current state of science on pesticide exposure to non-Apis bees and to determine how well honey bee exposure estimates, implemented by different regulatory agencies, may be protective for non-Apis bees. Workshop participants determined that although current risk assessment procedures for honey bees are largely conservative, several routes of exposure are unique to non-Apis bees and warranted further investigation. In this forum article, we discuss these key routes of exposure relevant to non-Apis bees and identify important research gaps that can help inform future bee risk assessment decisions.
当前的农药风险评估做法将西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)作为一种替代物,来表征候选农药对所有蜜蜂物种的化学暴露可能性。蜜蜂是一个多样化的昆虫群体,为人工管理的和野生的生态系统提供关键的授粉服务。因此,它们表现出多样的行为,在生活方式和物候方面差异很大,比如它们的羽化时间、群居程度以及觅食和筑巢行为。与西方蜜蜂相比,其中一些因素可能导致不同的或可变的暴露途径。对于那些具有与西方蜜蜂不同生活史的蜜蜂,可能需要进一步进行风险评估。2017年1月,来自监管机构、学术界和农用化学工业的40位蜜蜂研究人员齐聚一堂,讨论农药对非西方蜜蜂暴露的科学现状,并确定不同监管机构实施的西方蜜蜂暴露估计对非西方蜜蜂的保护程度如何。研讨会参与者确定,尽管目前针对西方蜜蜂的风险评估程序在很大程度上是保守的,但非西方蜜蜂有几种独特的暴露途径,值得进一步研究。在这篇论坛文章中,我们讨论了与非西方蜜蜂相关的这些关键暴露途径,并指出了重要的研究空白,这些空白有助于为未来的蜜蜂风险评估决策提供参考。