• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定和评估沟通策略以支持基于证据的知情决策和实践 (DECIDE):方案和初步结果。

Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results.

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, UK.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 9;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-6.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-8-6
PMID:23302501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3553065/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare decision makers face challenges when using guidelines, including understanding the quality of the evidence or the values and preferences upon which recommendations are made, which are often not clear.

METHODS

GRADE is a systematic approach towards assessing the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations in healthcare. GRADE also gives advice on how to go from evidence to decisions. It has been developed to address the weaknesses of other grading systems and is now widely used internationally. The Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE) consortium (http://www.decide-collaboration.eu/), which includes members of the GRADE Working Group and other partners, will explore methods to ensure effective communication of evidence-based recommendations targeted at key stakeholders: healthcare professionals, policymakers, and managers, as well as patients and the general public. Surveys and interviews with guideline producers and other stakeholders will explore how presentation of the evidence could be improved to better meet their information needs. We will collect further stakeholder input from advisory groups, via consultations and user testing; this will be done across a wide range of healthcare systems in Europe, North America, and other countries. Targeted communication strategies will be developed, evaluated in randomized trials, refined, and assessed during the development of real guidelines.

DISCUSSION

Results of the DECIDE project will improve the communication of evidence-based healthcare recommendations. Building on the work of the GRADE Working Group, DECIDE will develop and evaluate methods that address communication needs of guideline users. The project will produce strategies for communicating recommendations that have been rigorously evaluated in diverse settings, and it will support the transfer of research into practice in healthcare systems globally.

摘要

背景

医疗保健决策者在使用指南时面临挑战,包括理解证据质量或推荐所依据的价值观和偏好,而这些通常不明确。

方法

GRADE 是一种系统方法,用于评估医疗保健中证据质量和推荐强度。GRADE 还就如何从证据到决策提供建议。它是为了解决其他分级系统的弱点而开发的,现在在国际上广泛使用。包括 GRADE 工作组成员和其他合作伙伴在内的制定和评估沟通策略以支持基于证据的决策和实践(DECIDE)联盟(http://www.decide-collaboration.eu/)将探索确保有效沟通针对关键利益相关者的基于证据的建议的方法:医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者和管理人员,以及患者和公众。对指南制定者和其他利益相关者的调查和访谈将探讨如何改进证据的呈现方式,以更好地满足他们的信息需求。我们将通过咨询和用户测试,从顾问小组收集更多的利益相关者意见;这将在欧洲、北美和其他国家的广泛医疗保健系统中进行。将制定有针对性的沟通策略,并在随机试验中进行评估、改进和评估实际指南的制定过程。

讨论

DECIDE 项目的结果将改善基于证据的医疗保健建议的沟通。DECIDE 将在 GRADE 工作组的工作基础上,开发和评估满足指南用户沟通需求的方法。该项目将制定在不同环境中经过严格评估的沟通建议策略,并支持将研究成果转移到全球医疗保健系统中的实践中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/f25210ddd787/1748-5908-8-6-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/be0aa3138faf/1748-5908-8-6-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/7978577d2a6a/1748-5908-8-6-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/f25210ddd787/1748-5908-8-6-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/be0aa3138faf/1748-5908-8-6-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/7978577d2a6a/1748-5908-8-6-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28ed/3553065/f25210ddd787/1748-5908-8-6-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results.制定和评估沟通策略以支持基于证据的知情决策和实践 (DECIDE):方案和初步结果。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 9;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-6.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.国际循证指南关于多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理的推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.多囊卵巢综合征评估与管理的国际循证指南推荐意见。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1602-1618. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.
6
Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome†.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐意见†。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep 5;38(9):1655-1679. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead156.
7
Recommendations From the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 18;108(10):2447-2469. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad463.
8
Recommendations from the 2023 International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.2023 年多囊卵巢综合征评估和管理国际循证指南推荐意见。
Fertil Steril. 2023 Oct;120(4):767-793. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
9
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 1 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis to inform guideline scope and develop qualitative findings statements.指南的定性证据综合(QES):第 1 篇——使用定性证据综合来为指南范围提供信息并制定定性发现陈述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 8;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0467-5.
10
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.指南中证据的综合、分级和呈现:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 7 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会工作组报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness, use and perception of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - a national cross-sectional survey among patients with a cancer diagnosis and healthcare providers.患者版临床实践指南的知晓、使用和认知情况——一项针对癌症患者和医疗保健提供者的全国性横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1211. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11563-2.
2
Evaluating the impact of the global evidence, local adaptation (GELA) project for enhancing evidence-informed guideline recommendations for newborn and young child health in three African countries: a mixed-methods protocol.评估全球证据、地方适应(GELA)项目对增强三个非洲国家新生儿和幼儿健康循证指南建议的影响:一项混合方法研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01189-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial.格式修改改进了 GRADE 证据概况指南小组成员对信息的理解和可及性。一项随机试验。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;65(7):748-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.013. Epub 2012 May 5.
2
Methodology for the development of antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.抗栓治疗与血栓预防指南制定方法:《抗栓治疗与血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会循证临床实践指南》。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):53S-70S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2288.
3
Exercise prescription for the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases in primary care: Protocol of the RedExAP study.在初级保健中预防和治疗慢性病的运动处方:RedExAP 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 5;19(7):e0302652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302652. eCollection 2024.
4
Characteristics and quality of clinical practice guidelines for diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review.糖尿病肾病临床实践指南的特征和质量:系统评价。
J Tradit Chin Med. 2024 Jun;44(3):609-619. doi: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.20240402.002.
5
Insights into implementation planning for point-of-care testing to guide treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation: a mixed methods feasibility study.即时检验实施计划对慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期治疗的指导作用洞察:一项混合方法可行性研究
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jan 3;3:1302653. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1302653. eCollection 2023.
6
History of the Task Force for the Korean Clinical Guidelines of the Developmental Disorders.韩国发育障碍临床指南特别工作组的历史。
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 1;35(1):4-7. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.230017.
7
Modern Paediatric Emergency Department: Potential Improvements in Light of New Evidence.现代儿科急诊科:基于新证据的潜在改进措施
Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;10(4):741. doi: 10.3390/children10040741.
8
A Perspective on Implementation Outcomes and Strategies to Promote the Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccines.关于促进新冠疫苗接种的实施成果与策略的观点
Front Health Serv. 2022 May 20;2:897227. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.897227. eCollection 2022.
9
Examining the Use of HIV Self-Testing to Support PrEP Delivery: a Systematic Literature Review.审视 HIV 自我检测在 PrEP 推广中的应用:系统文献回顾。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2022 Oct;19(5):394-408. doi: 10.1007/s11904-022-00617-x. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
10
Publishing clinical prActice GuidelinEs (PAGE): Recommendations from editors and reviewers.发表临床实践指南(PAGE):编辑和审稿人的建议。
Chin J Traumatol. 2022 Nov;25(6):312-316. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability.如何提高指南的使用效果?一个可实施性的概念框架。
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 22;6:26. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-26.
4
Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing by general practitioners of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a randomised controlled trial to compare paper-based and web-based modelling experiments.开发和评估干预措施以减少全科医生对上呼吸道感染开具抗生素的不当处方:一项比较纸质和基于网络的建模实验的随机对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 3;6:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-16.
5
Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries.针对中低收入国家卫生决策者的证据摘要。
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Jan 1;89(1):54-61. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.075481. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
6
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
7
Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information.Cochrane 综述中的“发现总结表”提高了对关键信息的理解和快速检索能力。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):620-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014.
8
User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews.用户测试和利益相关者的反馈有助于为 Cochrane 综述开发出易于理解和有用的发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;63(6):607-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.013.
9
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective.证据质量分级与推荐强度:一种观点。
PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000151. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.AHRQ 系列论文 5:比较医疗干预措施时证据体的力度分级——医疗保健研究和质量机构和有效医疗保健计划。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):513-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.009.