National Research Council, Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, via Ugo La Malfa 153, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Department of Economics, Business and Statistical Science, University of Palermo, viale delle Scienze, Ed. 13, 90128, Palermo, Italy.
Environ Health. 2018 Dec 5;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0430-x.
Due to the complex interplay among different urban-related exposures, a comprehensive approach is advisable to estimate the health effects. We simultaneously assessed the effect of "green", "grey" and air pollution exposure on respiratory/allergic conditions and general symptoms in schoolchildren.
This study involved 219 schoolchildren (8-10 years) of the Municipality of Palermo, Italy. Data were collected through questionnaires self-administered by parents and children. Exposures to greenness and greyness at the home addresses were measured using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), residential surrounding greyness (RSG) and the CORINE land-cover classes (CLC). RSG was defined as the percentage of buffer covered by either industrial, commercial and transport units, or dump and construction sites, or urban fabric related features. Two specific categories of CLC, namely "discontinuous urban fabric - DUF" - and "continuous urban fabric - CUF" - areas were found. Exposure to traffic-related nitrogen dioxide (NO) was assessed using a Land-Use Regression model. A symptom score ranging from 0 to 22 was built by summing affirmative answers to twenty-two questions on symptoms. To avoid multicollinearity, multiple Logistic and Poisson ridge regression models were applied to assess the relationships between environmental factors and self-reported symptoms.
A very low exposure to NDVI ≤0.15 (1st quartile) had a higher odds of nasal symptoms (OR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.07-2.03]). Children living in CUF areas had higher odds of ocular symptoms (OR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.10-2.03]) and general symptoms (OR = 1.18, 95% CI [1.00-1.48]) than children living in DUF areas. Children living in proximity (≤200 m) to High Traffic Roads (HTRs) had increased odds of ocular (OR = 1.68, 95% CI [1.31-2.17]) and nasal symptoms (OR = 1.49, 95% CI [1.12-1.98]). A very high exposure to NO ≥ 60 μg/m (4th quartile) was associated with a higher odds of general symptoms (OR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.10-1.48]). No associations were found with RGS. A Poisson ridge regression model on the symptom score showed that children living in proximity to HTRs (≤200 m) had a higher symptoms score (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.02-1.17]) than children living > 200 m from HTRs. Children living in CUF areas had a higher symptoms score (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.03-1.19]) than children living in DUF areas.
Multiple exposures related to greenness, greyness (measured by CORINE) and air pollution within the urban environment are associated with respiratory/allergic and general symptoms in schoolchildren. No associations were found when considering the individual exposure to greyness measured using the RSG indicator.
由于不同城市相关暴露因素之间的复杂相互作用,建议采用综合方法来估计健康影响。我们同时评估了“绿色”、“灰色”和空气污染暴露对学龄儿童呼吸/过敏状况和一般症状的影响。
本研究涉及意大利巴勒莫市的 219 名(8-10 岁)学龄儿童。通过家长和儿童自我管理的问卷收集数据。家庭住址的绿化和灰色暴露度分别使用归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)、住宅周围灰色(RSG)和 CORINE 土地覆盖类别(CLC)进行测量。RSG 被定义为缓冲区覆盖工业、商业和运输单位、垃圾场和建筑工地或城市结构相关特征的百分比。发现了两个特定的 CLC 类别,即“不连续城市结构-DUF”和“连续城市结构-CUF”区域。使用土地利用回归模型评估与交通相关的二氧化氮(NO)暴露。通过将 22 个关于症状的肯定回答相加,构建了一个症状评分,范围从 0 到 22。为了避免多重共线性,应用多元逻辑和泊松岭回归模型来评估环境因素与自我报告症状之间的关系。
非常低的 NDVI 暴露度(1 分位数,≤0.15)与鼻部症状(OR=1.47,95%CI [1.07-2.03])的几率更高。居住在 CUF 区的儿童与居住在 DUF 区的儿童相比,出现眼部症状(OR=1.49,95%CI [1.10-2.03])和一般症状(OR=1.18,95%CI [1.00-1.48])的几率更高。居住在靠近(≤200 米)高交通道路(HTRs)的儿童,出现眼部(OR=1.68,95%CI [1.31-2.17])和鼻部症状(OR=1.49,95%CI [1.12-1.98])的几率更高。NO 暴露度非常高(4 分位数,≥60μg/m)与一般症状(OR=1.28,95%CI [1.10-1.48])的几率更高。与 RGS 无关联。对症状评分的泊松岭回归模型显示,居住在 HTRs 附近(≤200 米)的儿童的症状评分(RR=1.09,95%CI [1.02-1.17])高于居住在 HTRs 超过 200 米的儿童。居住在 CUF 区的儿童的症状评分(RR=1.11,95%CI [1.03-1.19])高于居住在 DUF 区的儿童。
城市环境中与绿化、灰色(由 CORINE 测量)和空气污染相关的多种暴露与学龄儿童的呼吸/过敏和一般症状有关。当考虑使用 RSG 指标单独测量的灰色暴露时,未发现任何关联。