Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0207912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207912. eCollection 2018.
This study examines the roles of time perspective, affect, and locus of control in mediating the relationship between regulatory mode and procrastination. Participants filled out the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Scale, Multidimensional Locus of Control Inventory, Locomotion and Assessment Scale, and Lay's General Procrastination scale. Results showed that procrastination was negatively related to locomotion orientation but positively associated with assessment orientation. The relations between regulatory mode and procrastination were mediated by negative affective state, internal sense of control, and negative past and future time perspectives. These findings suggest not only a behavioral link between regulatory mode and procrastination but also affective and cognitive differences in locomotion and assessment orientations that may account for such linkage. The present results also provide empirical support for the theory of locomotion-temporality interface (Kruglanski, Pierro, & Higgins, 2016).
本研究考察了时间观念、情感和控制点在调节调节模式与拖延之间关系中的作用。参与者填写了津巴多时间观念量表、正负情感量表、多维控制点量表、运动和评估量表以及莱氏普遍拖延量表。结果表明,拖延与运动取向呈负相关,与评估取向呈正相关。调节模式与拖延之间的关系受到消极情绪状态、内部控制感以及消极的过去和未来时间观念的中介。这些发现不仅表明了调节模式与拖延之间存在行为联系,还表明了运动和评估取向在情感和认知上的差异可能解释了这种联系。本研究结果还为运动-时间界面理论(Kruglanski、Pierro 和 Higgins,2016)提供了实证支持。