多维完美主义和拖延模型：寻求两者的决定因素。
Multidimensional Models of Perfectionism and Procrastination: Seeking Determinants of Both.
机构信息
Psychology Department, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49417, USA.
出版信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 15;17(14):5099. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145099.
BACKGROUND
Perfectionism is currently conceptualized using a multidimensional model, with extensive research establishing the presence of both maladaptive and adaptive forms. However, the potential adaptability of procrastination, largely considered as a maladaptive construct, and its possible developmental connection to perfectionism remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the individual differences of the multidimensional models of both perfectionism and procrastination, as well as investigating potential links between the two constructs.
METHODS
A convenience sample of 206 undergraduate students participated in this study. Participants completed a questionnaire consisting of 236 questions regarding the variables under investigation.
RESULTS
The adaptive model of procrastination yielded largely insignificant results and demonstrated limited links with adaptive perfectionism, while maladaptive procrastination was consistently associated with maladaptive perfectionism, lending further evidence of a unidimensional model of procrastination.
CONCLUSIONS
Many previous findings regarding the multidimensional model of perfectionism were replicated, along with new contributions focusing on the dual-process model and temporal orientation.
背景
完美主义目前采用多维模型进行概念化，广泛的研究已经确定了适应性和非适应性两种形式的存在。然而，拖延这一在很大程度上被认为是一种非适应性结构的潜在适应性，以及它与完美主义可能存在的发展联系尚不清楚。本研究旨在检验完美主义和拖延的多维模型的个体差异，并探讨这两个结构之间的潜在联系。
方法
本研究采用方便抽样法，共 206 名本科生参与了这项研究。参与者完成了一份包含 236 个问题的问卷，这些问题涉及研究中所调查的变量。
结果
适应性拖延模型的结果大多没有意义，与适应性完美主义的联系有限，而非适应性拖延则与非适应性完美主义始终相关，进一步证明了拖延的单维模型。
结论
本研究复制了许多关于完美主义多维模型的先前发现，并提出了一些新的贡献，重点关注双过程模型和时间取向。
Zotero 插件