• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多变量孟德尔随机化在单样本和两样本汇总数据设置中的检验。

An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.

机构信息

MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):713-727. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy262.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyy262
PMID:30535378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6734942/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful tool in epidemiology that can be used to estimate the causal effect of an exposure on an outcome in the presence of unobserved confounding, by utilizing genetic variants that are instrumental variables (IVs) for the exposure. This has been extended to multivariable MR (MVMR) to estimate the effect of two or more exposures on an outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We use simulations and theory to clarify the interpretation of estimated effects in a MVMR analysis under a range of underlying scenarios, where a secondary exposure acts variously as a confounder, a mediator, a pleiotropic pathway and a collider. We then describe how instrument strength and validity can be assessed for an MVMR analysis in the single-sample setting, and develop tests to assess these assumptions in the popular two-sample summary data setting. We illustrate our methods using data from UK Biobank to estimate the effect of education and cognitive ability on body mass index.

CONCLUSION

MVMR analysis consistently estimates the direct causal effect of an exposure, or exposures, of interest and provides a powerful tool for determining causal effects in a wide range of scenarios with either individual- or summary-level data.

摘要

背景

孟德尔随机化(MR)是流行病学中一种强大的工具,它可以通过利用作为暴露的工具变量(IV)的遗传变异,在存在未观察到的混杂的情况下,估计暴露对结果的因果效应。这已经扩展到多变量 MR(MVMR),以估计两种或更多暴露对结果的影响。

方法和结果

我们使用模拟和理论来澄清在一系列潜在情况下,MVMR 分析中估计效应的解释,其中次要暴露作为混杂因素、中介物、多效途径和碰撞器的作用各不相同。然后,我们描述了如何在单样本设置中评估 MVMR 分析的工具强度和有效性,并开发了用于评估两种流行的汇总数据设置中这些假设的检验。我们使用来自英国生物库的数据来估计教育和认知能力对体重指数的影响来说明我们的方法。

结论

MVMR 分析一致地估计了感兴趣的暴露或暴露的直接因果效应,并为使用个体或汇总水平数据在广泛的情况下确定因果效应提供了强大的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/2209d9047460/dyy262f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/251e621f0238/dyy262f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/76828e1b4d6d/dyy262f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/03b43fa6aa05/dyy262f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/13bb78952b4b/dyy262f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/d0f582c21cd7/dyy262f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/937a5c70e485/dyy262f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/2209d9047460/dyy262f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/251e621f0238/dyy262f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/76828e1b4d6d/dyy262f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/03b43fa6aa05/dyy262f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/13bb78952b4b/dyy262f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/d0f582c21cd7/dyy262f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/937a5c70e485/dyy262f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7276/6734942/2209d9047460/dyy262f7.jpg

相似文献

1
An examination of multivariable Mendelian randomization in the single-sample and two-sample summary data settings.多变量孟德尔随机化在单样本和两样本汇总数据设置中的检验。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):713-727. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy262.
2
Testing and correcting for weak and pleiotropic instruments in two-sample multivariable Mendelian randomization.两样本多变量孟德尔随机化中弱工具和多效性工具的检验和校正。
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 10;40(25):5434-5452. doi: 10.1002/sim.9133. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
3
Estimation of causal effects of a time-varying exposure at multiple time points through multivariable mendelian randomization.通过多变量孟德尔随机化估计多个时间点随时间变化的暴露因素的因果效应。
PLoS Genet. 2022 Jul 18;18(7):e1010290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010290. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Estimating and visualising multivariable Mendelian randomization analyses within a radial framework.在径向框架内估计和可视化多变量孟德尔随机化分析
PLoS Genet. 2024 Dec 16;20(12):e1011506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011506. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Unbiased causal inference with Mendelian randomization and covariate-adjusted GWAS data.利用孟德尔随机化和协变量调整的全基因组关联研究数据进行无偏因果推断。
HGG Adv. 2025 Apr 10;6(2):100412. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100412. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
6
Multivariable Mendelian Randomization and Mediation.多变量孟德尔随机化和中介分析。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2021 Feb 1;11(2):a038984. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a038984.
7
Causal relationship between bone mineral density and intervertebral disc degeneration: a univariate and multivariable mendelian randomization study.骨密度与椎间盘退变之间的因果关系:单变量和多变量孟德尔随机化研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07631-7.
8
Multivariable MR Can Mitigate Bias in Two-Sample MR Using Covariable-Adjusted Summary Associations.多变量孟德尔随机化可以利用协变量调整后的汇总关联来减轻两样本孟德尔随机化中的偏差。
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22606. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22606.
9
Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption.提高两样本汇总数据孟德尔随机化的准确性:超越 NOME 假设。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):728-742. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy258.
10
Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization.两样本汇总数据孟德尔随机化中的异质性强检验
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5791-5802. doi: 10.1002/sim.10279. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The Causal Mechanism Between the Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4, Heart Failure, and Other Cardiovascular Diseases: A Mendelian Randomization and Mediation Study.二肽基肽酶-4、心力衰竭及其他心血管疾病之间的因果机制:一项孟德尔随机化与中介研究
Int J Endocrinol. 2025 Aug 26;2025:2357272. doi: 10.1155/ije/2357272. eCollection 2025.
2
Mendelian randomization analysis of the association between vitamin B12 deficiency anaemia and the risk of developing lung disease.维生素B12缺乏性贫血与患肺病风险之间关联的孟德尔随机化分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 3;15(1):32361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13368-7.
3
Causal Link of Seven Trace Elements and Eight Nutrients With Meningioma: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Use of the Lasso for Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments.关于在存在一些无效工具变量的情况下使用套索进行工具变量估计
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018 Nov 13;114(527):1339-1350. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1498346. eCollection 2019.
2
Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption.提高两样本汇总数据孟德尔随机化的准确性:超越 NOME 假设。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):728-742. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy258.
3
Causal null hypotheses of sustained treatment strategies: What can be tested with an instrumental variable?
七种微量元素和八种营养素与脑膜瘤的因果关系:双向两样本孟德尔随机化分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Sep;15(9):e70852. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70852.
4
Instrumental variable approaches for estimating time-varying treatment effects in comparative effectiveness research.比较效果研究中用于估计时变治疗效果的工具变量方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02625-y.
5
The causal effects of remnant cholesterol on increased risk of cardiovascular diseases in East Asians.残余胆固醇对东亚人心血管疾病风险增加的因果效应。
BMC Med. 2025 Aug 26;23(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04329-y.
6
Theoretical Framework and Methodological Approach for Investigating Potential Associations Between Long COVID and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence.调查长新冠与自闭症谱系障碍患病率之间潜在关联的理论框架和方法学途径。
NeuroSci. 2025 Aug 13;6(3):80. doi: 10.3390/neurosci6030080.
7
Causal Effect of Plasma Fatty Acid Profiles on Psoriasis Risk: Genetic Evidence from a Mendelian Randomization Study.血浆脂肪酸谱对银屑病风险的因果效应:孟德尔随机化研究的遗传证据
Psoriasis (Auckl). 2025 Aug 16;15:389-399. doi: 10.2147/PTT.S538518. eCollection 2025.
8
Thyroiditis and human blood metabolites: A mendelian randomization study.甲状腺炎与人体血液代谢物:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
J Med Biochem. 2025 Jul 4;44(4):872-885. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-56217.
9
Elucidating the causal role of age of menarche, adiposity, lipid fractions, and blood pressure upon cardiovascular disease: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study.阐明初潮年龄、肥胖、血脂成分和血压对心血管疾病的因果作用:一项多变量孟德尔随机化研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1038/s41371-025-01048-y.
10
Gut microbiome and diabetic kidney disease: Insights from Mendelian randomization and genetic correlations.肠道微生物群与糖尿病肾病:孟德尔随机化和遗传相关性研究的见解
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 15;104(33):e42492. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042492.
因果虚无假设的持续治疗策略:可以用工具变量来检验什么?
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;33(8):723-728. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0396-6. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
A weak instrument [Formula: see text]-test in linear IV models with multiple endogenous variables.具有多个内生变量的线性IV模型中的弱工具变量[公式:见正文]-检验。
J Econom. 2016 Feb;190(2):212-221. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.004.
5
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations.碰撞范围:当选择偏差可能对观察到的关联产生实质性影响时。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 1;47(1):226-235. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx206.
6
Extending the MR-Egger method for multivariable Mendelian randomization to correct for both measured and unmeasured pleiotropy.扩展多变量孟德尔随机化的MR-Egger方法以校正测量到的和未测量到的多效性。
Stat Med. 2017 Dec 20;36(29):4705-4718. doi: 10.1002/sim.7492. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
7
Dissecting Causal Pathways Using Mendelian Randomization with Summarized Genetic Data: Application to Age at Menarche and Risk of Breast Cancer.利用汇总遗传数据的孟德尔随机化剖析因果途径:应用于初潮年龄与乳腺癌风险
Genetics. 2017 Oct;207(2):481-487. doi: 10.1534/genetics.117.300191. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
Mendelian randomisation in cardiovascular research: an introduction for clinicians.心血管研究中的孟德尔随机化:临床医生入门指南
Heart. 2017 Sep;103(18):1400-1407. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310605. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence.对78308人进行的全基因组关联荟萃分析确定了影响人类智力的新基因座和基因。
Nat Genet. 2017 Jul;49(7):1107-1112. doi: 10.1038/ng.3869. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Does more education cause lower BMI, or do lower-BMI individuals become more educated? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979.更多的教育是否会导致较低的 BMI,还是较低 BMI 的人会受到更多的教育?来自 1979 年全国青年纵向调查的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Mar 21.