Suppr超能文献

在活体共聚焦显微镜分类诊断中的睑板腺功能障碍。

In vivo confocal microscopy classification in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, DHU Sight Restore, INSERM-DHOS CIC, Paris, France.

Department of Ophthalmology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2019 May;33(5):754-760. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0307-9. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

Abstract

AIM

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is one of the most common disorders in ophthalmology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of this in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)-MGD description to classify patients affected by clinical MGD and measure the correlation with standard clinical criteria and subjective symptoms.

METHODS

One hundred eyes of 100 patients suffering from MGD and 15 eyes of normal subjects were included. A comprehensive evaluation with the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), tear osmolarity, Oxford score, Meibomian gland expression, palpebral IVCM, and meibography was performed. Then each patient was classified using a new IVCM classification: type 0 for normality, type 1 for meibum obstruction, type 2 for inflammation, and type 3 for fibrosis.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 52 ± 20 years old, the OSDI was 38 ± 23, the BUT 5 ± 2.6 s, the Schirmer test 13 ± 7 mm, tear osmolarity 300 ± 11 osmol/L, the Oxford score 0.5 ± 0.6, the meibum expression score 1.7 ± 1.02, and the meibography score 1.3 ± 0.9. The IVCM MG classification of the 15 normal subjects was 0. For MGD patients, 29% were in type 1, 40% were type 2, and 31% were type 3. The patients in IVCM MG type 2 had a higher OSDI (p = 0.001) compared with the other types. There was a strong correlation between the IVCM score and the meibography score (r = 0.71 p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This new IVCM classification provided a practical pathophysiological system for MGD. By giving objective criteria, this IVCM classification may help advance the understanding of patients' symptoms and enhance treatment effectiveness in MGD.

摘要

目的

睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)是眼科最常见的疾病之一。本研究旨在评估使用这种活体共聚焦显微镜(IVCM)-MGD 描述来对临床 MGD 患者进行分类,并测量其与标准临床标准和主观症状的相关性。

方法

纳入 100 例 MGD 患者的 100 只眼和 15 例正常对照者的 15 只眼。采用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)、泪液分泌试验(Schirmer 试验)、泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、泪液渗透压、牛津评分、睑板腺表达、睑板腺活体共聚焦显微镜和睑板腺照相检查进行综合评估。然后,根据一种新的 IVCM 分类法对每位患者进行分类:0 型为正常,1 型为睑板腺分泌物阻塞,2 型为炎症,3 型为纤维化。

结果

患者的平均年龄为 52±20 岁,OSDI 为 38±23,BUT 为 5±2.6s,Schirmer 试验为 13±7mm,泪液渗透压为 300±11 毫渗摩尔/升,牛津评分为 0.5±0.6,睑板腺分泌物评分 1.7±1.02,睑板腺照相评分 1.3±0.9。15 例正常对照者的 IVCM 睑板腺分类均为 0 型。MGD 患者中,29%为 1 型,40%为 2 型,31%为 3 型。MG 型 2 型患者的 OSDI 高于其他类型(p=0.001)。IVCM 评分与睑板腺照相评分之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.71,p<0.0001)。

结论

这种新的 IVCM 分类为 MGD 提供了一个实用的病理生理学系统。通过提供客观标准,这种 IVCM 分类可能有助于加深对患者症状的理解,并提高 MGD 的治疗效果。

相似文献

1
In vivo confocal microscopy classification in the diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction.
Eye (Lond). 2019 May;33(5):754-760. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0307-9. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
2
[In vivo confocal microscopy evaluation of meibomian glands in meibomian gland dysfunction patients].
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 11;52(9):649-56. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.09.004.
3
[A new classification for meibomian gland diseases with in vivo confocal microscopy].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Mar;39(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.07.015. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
Functional and Morphological Evaluation of Meibomian Glands in the Assessment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Subtype and Severity.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;209:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
5
Meibomian Gland Morphology Is a Sensitive Early Indicator of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Apr;200:16-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
6
In vivo confocal microscopy evaluation of ocular and cutaneous alterations in patients with rosacea.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;101(3):268-274. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-308110. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
Influence of video display terminal use and meibomian gland dysfunction on the ocular surface and tear neuromediators.
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 May;43(5):1537-1544. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02549-2. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
9
Increased Tear Fluid Production as a Compensatory Response to Meibomian Gland Loss: A Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.
Ophthalmology. 2015 May;122(5):925-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.12.018. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
Reliable, Noncontact Imaging Tool for the Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Function: Sirius Meibography.
Eye Contact Lens. 2020 Mar;46 Suppl 2:S135-S140. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000651.

引用本文的文献

2
Efficacy of indirect intense pulsed light irradiation on meibomian gland dysfunction: a randomized controlled study.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov 18;17(11):2014-2022. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.11.06. eCollection 2024.
3
Multimodal Approach in Dry Eye Disease Combining In Vivo Confocal Microscopy and HLA-DR Expression.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Aug 1;13(8):39. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.8.39.
5
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;67(4):448-539. doi: 10.1007/s10384-023-00995-8. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Dry Eye Disease Associated with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Focus on Tear Film Characteristics and the Therapeutic Landscape.
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Jun;12(3):1397-1418. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00669-1. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreements of the Detection of Infestation by Confocal Microscopy.
Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 Aug 5;7(3):173-180. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.37880. eCollection 2022.
9
Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;50(6):653-666. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14119. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
10
Artificial Intelligence to Detect Meibomian Gland Dysfunction From Laser Confocal Microscopy.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 25;8:774344. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.774344. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Morphological evaluation for diagnosis of dry eye related to meibomian gland dysfunction.
Exp Eye Res. 2017 Oct;163:72-77. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.07.005.
2
TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report.
Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):539-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Emerging strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction: Proceedings of the OCEAN group meeting.
Ocul Surf. 2017 Apr;15(2):179-192. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
[A new classification for meibomian gland diseases with in vivo confocal microscopy].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Mar;39(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.07.015. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Revisiting the vicious circle of dry eye disease: a focus on the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;100(3):300-6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307415. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
[Revisiting meibomian gland dysfunction].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014 Dec;37(10):757-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
8
9
In vivo confocal microscopy as a novel and reliable tool for the diagnosis of Demodex eyelid infestation.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Mar;99(3):336-41. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305671. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验