Lammers Imke, van Gerven-Haanpää Minna M-L, Treib Oliver
University of Twente, The Netherlands.
University of Münster, Germany.
Glob Soc Policy. 2018 Dec;18(3):304-322. doi: 10.1177/1468018118790957. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
How has the global social policy agenda evolved since the global economic crisis? To shed light on this question, this article looks at the discourses in European Union (EU) social policy. It draws on two rival theoretical approaches from the literature on globalisation and the welfare state, the efficiency and compensation hypotheses, and links these approaches to two fundamental rationales underlying the discourse in EU social policy. Based on an analysis of key documents from two Open Methods of Coordination (OMCs), the article shows that the logic underlying the efficiency hypothesis can be extended to discourses in EU social policy. While policy debates in one OMC remained largely unchanged, the discourse significantly shifted towards the economic rationale during and after the crisis in the other OMC. This suggests that the crisis at least partly strengthened the view that social policy should be geared towards economic efficiency, growth, and the creation of jobs.
自全球经济危机以来,全球社会政策议程是如何演变的?为了阐明这个问题,本文审视了欧盟社会政策中的话语。它借鉴了全球化与福利国家文献中的两种相互对立的理论方法,即效率假说和补偿假说,并将这些方法与欧盟社会政策话语背后的两个基本原理联系起来。基于对两种开放式协调方法(OMC)的关键文件的分析,本文表明效率假说背后的逻辑可以扩展到欧盟社会政策话语中。虽然一种OMC中的政策辩论基本保持不变,但在另一种OMC中,危机期间及之后的话语显著转向了经济原理。这表明危机至少在一定程度上强化了这样一种观点,即社会政策应朝着经济效率、增长和创造就业的方向发展。