• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“3 日惊讶问题”预测即将死亡的晚期癌症患者的预后:多中心前瞻性观察研究。

"3-Day Surprise Question" to predict prognosis of advanced cancer patients with impending death: Multicenter prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(3):1018-1026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3689. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.3689
PMID:33347734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7897938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to clarify the efficacy of the "3-Day Surprise Question (3DSQ)" in predicting the prognosis for advanced cancer patients with impending death.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a part of multicenter prospective observational study which investigated the dying process in advanced cancer patients in Japan. For patients with a Palliative Performance Scale ≤20, the 3DSQ "Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next 3 days?" was answered by their physicians. In addition to the sensitivity and specificity of the 3DSQ, the characteristics of patients who survived longer than expected were examined via multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 1896 patients enrolled, 1411 were evaluated. Among 1179 (83.6%) patients who were classified into the "Not surprised" group, 636 patients died within 3 days. Among 232 (16.4%) patients of "Yes surprised" group, 194 patients lived longer than 3 days. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the 3DSQ were 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.7% to 95.8%), 26.3% (95% CI: 24.8% to 27.6%), 53.9% (95% CI: 53.0% to 54.7%), and 83.6% (95% CI: 78.7% to 87.7%), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed palpable radial artery, absent respiration with mandibular movement, SpO ≥ 90%, opioid administration, and no continuous deep sedation as characteristics of patients who lived longer than expected.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-Day Surprise Question can be a useful screening tool to identify advanced cancer patients with impending death.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在阐明“3 天惊奇问题(3DSQ)”在预测即将死亡的晚期癌症患者预后中的作用。

患者和方法

这是一项多中心前瞻性观察研究的一部分,该研究调查了日本晚期癌症患者的临终过程。对于姑息治疗表现量表(Palliative Performance Scale)≤20 的患者,由其医生回答 3DSQ“如果这位患者在接下来的 3 天内死亡,我会感到惊讶吗?”。除了 3DSQ 的灵敏度和特异性外,还通过多变量分析检查了存活时间超过预期的患者的特征。

结果

在纳入的 1896 名患者中,有 1411 名患者进行了评估。在被归类为“不惊讶”组的 1179 名(83.6%)患者中,有 636 名患者在 3 天内死亡。在“惊讶”组的 232 名(16.4%)患者中,有 194 名患者存活时间超过 3 天。3DSQ 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 94.3%(95%置信区间[CI]:92.7%至 95.8%)、26.3%(95% CI:24.8%至 27.6%)、53.9%(95% CI:53.0%至 54.7%)和 83.6%(95% CI:78.7%至 87.7%)。多变量分析显示,可触及的桡动脉、下颌运动时无呼吸、SpO2≥90%、阿片类药物的使用以及无持续深度镇静是患者存活时间超过预期的特征。

结论

3 天惊奇问题可以作为一种有用的筛查工具,用于识别即将死亡的晚期癌症患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/debd/7897938/2356b138cfe0/CAM4-10-1018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/debd/7897938/2356b138cfe0/CAM4-10-1018-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/debd/7897938/2356b138cfe0/CAM4-10-1018-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
"3-Day Surprise Question" to predict prognosis of advanced cancer patients with impending death: Multicenter prospective observational study.“3 日惊讶问题”预测即将死亡的晚期癌症患者的预后:多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(3):1018-1026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3689. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Is the 1-day surprise question a useful screening tool for predicting prognosis in patients with advanced cancer?-a multicenter prospective observational study.1 天意外问题是预测晚期癌症患者预后的有用筛查工具吗?——一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;10(11):11278-11287. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1718. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
Surprise Questions for Survival Prediction in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.晚期癌症患者生存预测的意外问题:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):839-44. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0015. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
4
Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
5
"The surprise questions" using variable time frames in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.在晚期癌症住院患者中使用可变时间框架的“突发问题”
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Apr;20(2):221-225. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000766.
6
Surprise Question and Performance Status Indicate Urgency of Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Emergency Department: An Observational Cohort Study.在急诊科有晚期癌症的患者中,意外问题和表现状态提示了舒缓治疗需求的紧迫性:一项观察性队列研究。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jun;23(6):801-808. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0413. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
7
Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?".观察性研究:在“如果这个患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?”这个问题上,主治医生和住院医师之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. eCollection 2021.
8
The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.惊喜问题作为触发因素,用于对患有晚期心脏病的儿童进行初级姑息治疗干预。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Dec;43(8):1822-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02919-8. Epub 2022 May 3.
9
Screening with the double surprise question to predict deterioration and death: an explorative study.双重意外问题筛查预测恶化和死亡:一项探索性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Dec 27;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0503-9.
10
Incidence and associated factors of sudden unexpected death in advanced cancer patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study.晚期癌症患者中突然意外死亡的发生率及相关因素:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jul;10(14):4939-4947. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4030. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Wireless patches for continuous vital sign monitoring, symptoms and medication at the end-of-life in the palliative care unit: A prospective observational study.用于姑息治疗病房临终患者连续生命体征监测、症状及用药情况的无线贴片:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Aug 19. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01343-6.
2
Quality for All: Clinical Trial Enrollment and End-of-Life Care in Solid and Hematologic Malignancies.全民医疗质量:实体瘤和血液系统恶性肿瘤的临床试验入组及临终关怀
Cancer Med. 2025 May;14(9):e70775. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70775.
3
Determining timeframes to death for imminently dying patients: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Specialist palliative medicine physicians and nurses accuracy at predicting imminent death (within 72 hours): a short report.专科姑息医学医师和护士预测近期死亡(72 小时内)的准确性:简短报告。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;10(2):209-212. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002224. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
2
Space for intuition - the 'Surprise'-Question in haemato-oncology: Qualitative analysis of experiences and perceptions of haemato-oncologists.给直觉留些空间——肿瘤血液学中的“意外”之问:肿瘤血液学家的经验和看法的定性分析。
Palliat Med. 2019 May;33(5):531-540. doi: 10.1177/0269216318824271. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
How accurate is the 'Surprise Question' at identifying patients at the end of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
确定濒死患者的死亡时间框架:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 13;24(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01637-7.
4
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
5
'How long do you think?' Unresponsive dying patients in a specialist palliative care service: A consecutive cohort study.你认为需要多长时间?在专科姑息治疗服务中无反应的临终患者:一项连续队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2024 May;38(5):546-554. doi: 10.1177/02692163241238903. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Prognostic evaluation in patients with advanced cancer in the last months of life: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline.晚期癌症患者生命最后数月的预后评估:ESMO 临床实践指南。
ESMO Open. 2023 Apr;8(2):101195. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101195. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
7
Factors associated with good death of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective study in Japan.与晚期癌症患者善终相关的因素:日本的一项前瞻性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9577-9586. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07363-1. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“惊讶问题”的实用性:识别生命末期患者的有用工具?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1023-1046. doi: 10.1177/02692163221099116.
9
Prospective Comparison of Medical Oncologists and a Machine Learning Model to Predict 3-Month Mortality in Patients With Metastatic Solid Tumors.前瞻性比较医学肿瘤学家和机器学习模型预测转移性实体瘤患者 3 个月死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2214514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14514.
10
Prognostication of the Last Days of Life.生命末期预测。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jul;54(3):631-643. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.1573. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
“意外问题”在识别临终患者方面的准确性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2017 Aug 2;15(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0907-4.
4
A diagnostic model for impending death in cancer patients: Preliminary report.癌症患者濒死的诊断模型:初步报告。
Cancer. 2015 Nov 1;121(21):3914-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29602. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
5
Survival prediction for advanced cancer patients in the real world: A comparison of the Palliative Prognostic Score, Delirium-Palliative Prognostic Score, Palliative Prognostic Index and modified Prognosis in Palliative Care Study predictor model.现实世界中晚期癌症患者的生存预测:姑息预后评分、谵妄-姑息预后评分、姑息预后指数与姑息治疗研究预测模型中改良预后的比较
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Aug;51(12):1618-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Surprise Questions for Survival Prediction in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.晚期癌症患者生存预测的意外问题:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):839-44. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0015. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
7
Clinical signs of impending death in cancer patients.癌症患者濒死的临床体征。
Oncologist. 2014 Jun;19(6):681-7. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0457. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
8
Variations in vital signs in the last days of life in patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症患者生命末期生命体征的变化
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):510-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
9
The 'surprise' question in advanced cancer patients: A prospective study among general practitioners.晚期癌症患者的“意外”问题:全科医生的一项前瞻性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jul;28(7):959-964. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526273. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
10
Strategic targeting of advance care planning interventions: the Goldilocks phenomenon.战略性地针对预先医疗护理计划干预措施:“金发姑娘现象”。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):620-4. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14384.