• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二元互动过程中对脸部的注视行为。

Gaze behavior to faces during dyadic interaction.

作者信息

Hessels Roy S, Cornelissen Tim H W, Hooge Ignace T C, Kemner Chantal

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):226-242. doi: 10.1037/cep0000113. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1037/cep0000113
PMID:28604032
Abstract

A long-standing hypothesis is that humans have a bias for fixating the eye region in the faces of others. Most studies have tested this hypothesis with static images or videos of faces, yet recent studies suggest that the use of such "nonresponsive" stimuli might overlook an influence of social context. The present study addressed whether the bias for fixating the eye region in faces would persist in a situation that allowed for social interaction. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate a setup in which a duo could engage in social interaction while their eye movements were recorded. Here, we show that there is a bias for fixating the eye region of a partner that is physically present. Moreover, we report that the time 1 partner in a duo spends looking at the eyes is a good predictor of how long the other partner looks at the eyes. In Experiment 2, we investigate whether participants attune to the level of eye contact instigated by a partner by having a confederate pose as one of the partners. The confederate was subsequently instructed to either fixate the eyes of the observer or scan the entire face. Gaze behaviour of the confederate did not affect gaze behaviour of the observers. We conclude that there is a bias to fixate the eyes when partners can engage in social interaction. In addition, the amount of time spent looking at the eyes is duo-dependent, but not easily manipulated by instructing the gaze behaviour of 1 partner. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

一个长期存在的假设是,人类在注视他人面部时倾向于注视眼睛区域。大多数研究都使用面部的静态图像或视频来检验这一假设,但最近的研究表明,使用这种“无反应”刺激可能会忽略社会背景的影响。本研究探讨了在允许社会互动的情况下,对面部眼睛区域的注视偏好是否会持续存在。在实验1中,我们展示了一种设置,即一对人在记录他们的眼动时可以进行社会互动。在这里,我们表明存在注视在场伙伴眼睛区域的偏好。此外,我们报告说,一对人中一方注视对方眼睛的时间是预测另一方注视对方眼睛时长的良好指标。在实验2中,我们通过让一名同伙扮演其中一方的角色,来研究参与者是否会根据伙伴引发的眼神交流程度进行调整。随后,要求同伙要么注视观察者的眼睛,要么扫视整个面部。同伙的注视行为并未影响观察者的注视行为。我们得出结论,当伙伴能够进行社会互动时,存在注视眼睛的偏好。此外,注视眼睛的时间量取决于两人组合,但不容易通过指示一方的注视行为来操纵。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》)

相似文献

1
Gaze behavior to faces during dyadic interaction.二元互动过程中对脸部的注视行为。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):226-242. doi: 10.1037/cep0000113. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
2
How different cultures look at faces depends on the interpersonal context.不同文化如何看待面部表情取决于人际环境。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;71(3):258-264. doi: 10.1037/cep0000119. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
3
Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.看法一致:社会注视互动会影响注视方向识别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2755-2765. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01671-1.
4
Gaze allocation in face-to-face communication is affected primarily by task structure and social context, not stimulus-driven factors.在面对面的交流中,注视分配主要受到任务结构和社会语境的影响,而不是由刺激驱动的因素。
Cognition. 2019 Mar;184:28-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
5
Attention holding elicited by direct-gaze faces is reflected in saccadic peak velocity.由直视面孔引发的注意力保持在扫视峰值速度中得以体现。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3319-3332. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5059-4. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
The Upper Eye Bias: Rotated Faces Draw Fixations to the Upper Eye.上眼偏差:旋转的面部会将注视吸引到上眼部位。
Perception. 2019 Feb;48(2):162-174. doi: 10.1177/0301006618819628. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
7
Gaze in a real-world social interaction: A dual eye-tracking study.现实世界社交互动中的注视:一项双眼追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2162-2173. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739221. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
8
Studying "natural" eye movements in an "unnatural" social environment: The influence of social activity, framing, and sub-clinical traits on gaze aversion.在“非自然”的社会环境中研究“自然”的眼球运动:社交活动、框架设定和亚临床特征对目光回避的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Aug;72(8):1913-1925. doi: 10.1177/1747021818819094. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
9
Eastern observers cannot inhibit their gaze to eye and nose regions in face perception.东方观察者在进行面孔感知时,无法抑制对眼睛和鼻子区域的注视。
Conscious Cogn. 2020 Mar;79:102881. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2020.102881. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
The effect of arousal and eye gaze direction on trust evaluations of stranger's faces: A potential pathway to paranoid thinking.唤醒和目光注视方向对陌生人面孔信任评估的影响:偏执思维的潜在途径。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;60:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
An AIC-type information criterion evaluating theory-based hypotheses for contingency tables.一种用于评估列联表基于理论假设的AIC型信息准则。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 22;57(2):70. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02570-6.
2
Gaze behavior in response to affect during natural social interactions.自然社交互动中对情感的注视行为。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1433483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433483. eCollection 2024.
3
Emotion-gaze interaction affects time-to-collision estimates, but not preferred interpersonal distance towards looming faces.
情绪-注视互动会影响碰撞时间估计,但不会影响对逼近面孔的偏好人际距离。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 11;15:1414702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1414702. eCollection 2024.
4
Sharing and Receiving Eye-Contact Predicts Mate Choice After a 5-Minute Conversation: Evidence from a Speed-Dating Study.分享和接收眼神交流可预测 5 分钟对话后的伴侣选择:来自速配研究的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):959-968. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02806-0. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
Evaluating gaze behaviors as pre-touch reactions for virtual agents.将注视行为评估为虚拟代理的预触摸反应。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1129677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129677. eCollection 2023.
6
Cracking the Code of Live Human Social Interactions in Autism: A Review of the Eye-Tracking Literature.破解自闭症患者真实人类社交互动的密码:眼动追踪文献综述
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2021 Oct;173:242-264.
7
How to choose the size of facial areas of interest in interactive eye tracking.如何选择交互式眼动追踪中感兴趣的面部区域大小。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 4;17(2):e0263594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263594. eCollection 2022.
8
Reality in a sphere: A direct comparison of social attention in the laboratory and the real world.现实中的社交互动:实验室与现实世界中社交关注度的直接比较
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2286-2301. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01724-0. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Evaluation of an eye tracking setup for studying visual attention in face-to-face conversations.评估眼动追踪设备在面对面会话中研究视觉注意力的效果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):2661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81987-x.
10
Eye tracking in human interaction: Possibilities and limitations.眼动追踪在人类交互中的应用:可能性与局限性。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Aug;53(4):1592-1608. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01517-x. Epub 2021 Jan 6.