• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估因子不变性:使用贝叶斯结构方程建模的区间估计方法。

Evaluating Factorial Invariance: An Interval Estimation Approach Using Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling.

机构信息

a University of South Carolina.

b University of Oklahoma.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;54(2):224-245. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1514484. Epub 2018 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1080/00273171.2018.1514484
PMID:30569738
Abstract

In this study, we introduce an interval estimation approach based on Bayesian structural equation modeling to evaluate factorial invariance. For each tested parameter, the size of noninvariance with an uncertainty interval (i.e. highest density interval [HDI]) is assessed via Bayesian parameter estimation. By comparing the most credible values (i.e. 95% HDI) with a region of practical equivalence (ROPE), the Bayesian approach allows researchers to (1) support the null hypothesis of practical invariance, and (2) examine the practical importance of the noninvariant parameter. Compared to the traditional likelihood ratio test, simulation results suggested that the proposed Bayesian approach could offer additional insight into evaluating factorial invariance, thus, leading to more informative conclusions. We provide an empirical example to demonstrate the procedures necessary to implement the proposed method in applied research. The importance of and influences on the choice of an appropriate ROPE are discussed.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们介绍了一种基于贝叶斯结构方程建模的区间估计方法,以评估因子不变性。对于每个测试的参数,通过贝叶斯参数估计来评估非不变性的大小和不确定性区间(即最高密度区间[HDI])。通过将最可信的值(即 95%HDI)与实际等效区间(ROPE)进行比较,贝叶斯方法允许研究人员:(1) 支持实际不变性的零假设;(2) 检验非不变参数的实际重要性。与传统的似然比检验相比,模拟结果表明,所提出的贝叶斯方法可以为评估因子不变性提供更多的见解,从而得出更有信息意义的结论。我们提供了一个实证示例,以演示在应用研究中实施所提出方法所需的步骤。讨论了适当的 ROPE 的选择的重要性和影响。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Factorial Invariance: An Interval Estimation Approach Using Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling.评估因子不变性:使用贝叶斯结构方程建模的区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;54(2):224-245. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1514484. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
2
Bayesian SEM for Specification Search Problems in Testing Factorial Invariance.用于检验因子不变性中规范搜索问题的贝叶斯结构方程模型
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Jul-Aug;52(4):430-444. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1306432. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
3
Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research.贝叶斯霍奇斯-莱曼检验在两样本设置中的统计等效性:生物医学研究中的功效分析、Ⅰ类错误率和等效边界选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01341-7.
4
The evidence interval and the Bayesian evidence value: On a unified theory for Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimation.证据区间与贝叶斯证据值:关于贝叶斯假设检验与区间估计的统一理论
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Nov;75(3):550-592. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12267. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
A Bayesian region of measurement equivalence (ROME) approach for establishing measurement invariance.贝叶斯测量等价区域(ROME)方法在测量不变性中的应用。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):993-1004. doi: 10.1037/met0000455. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Bayesian Analysis of Multi-Factorial Experimental Designs Using SEM.贝叶斯分析使用 SEM 的多因子实验设计。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):716-737. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2315557. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
7
Alleviating estimation problems in small sample structural equation modeling-A comparison of constrained maximum likelihood, Bayesian estimation, and fixed reliability approaches.缓解小样本结构方程模型中的估计问题——约束最大似然法、贝叶斯估计法和固定信度法的比较
Psychol Methods. 2023 Jun;28(3):527-557. doi: 10.1037/met0000435. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Decisions about equivalence: A comparison of TOST, HDI-ROPE, and the Bayes factor.关于等效性的决策:TOST、HDI-ROPE 和贝叶斯因子的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Jun;28(3):740-755. doi: 10.1037/met0000402. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
9
Adjusting for Measurement Noninvariance with Alignment in Growth Modeling.在增长模型中通过校准调整测量非不变性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2023 Jan-Feb;58(1):30-47. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2021.1941730. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
10
Adjusting for partial invariance in latent parameter estimation: Comparing forward specification search and approximate invariance methods.调整潜在参数估计中的部分不变性:比较前向指定搜索和近似不变性方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):414-434. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01560-2. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
An examination of model fit and measurement invariance of general mental ability and personality measures used in the multilingual context of the Swiss Armed Forces: A Bayesian structural equation modeling approach.在瑞士军队的多语言环境中使用的一般智力和人格测量的模型拟合和测量不变性的检验:贝叶斯结构方程建模方法。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Jan 2;36(1):96-113. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1963632. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (F-EPSI) among Iranian University men and women.伊朗男女大学生中波斯语版饮食病理症状量表(F-EPSI)的心理测量特性。
J Eat Disord. 2022 May 9;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40337-022-00587-w.
3
Adjusting for partial invariance in latent parameter estimation: Comparing forward specification search and approximate invariance methods.
调整潜在参数估计中的部分不变性:比较前向指定搜索和近似不变性方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):414-434. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01560-2. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
The Poor Fit of Model Fit for Selecting Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Scale Evaluation.量表评估探索性因素分析中用于选择因素数量的模型拟合不佳。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):413-440. doi: 10.1177/0013164420942899. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
It Matters: Reference Indicator Selection in Measurement Invariance Tests.重要事项:测量不变性检验中的参考指标选择
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):5-38. doi: 10.1177/0013164420926565. Epub 2020 Jun 5.