Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Aggress Behav. 2019 Mar;45(2):181-192. doi: 10.1002/ab.21808. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Adolescents engage in bullying and sexual harassment perpetration both in-person and online. Yet, little is known about the overlap of traditional (in-person) and cyber bullying and sexual harassment perpetration. The present study assessed the co-occurrence of these forms of aggression in high school and identified middle school predictors based on participants' perceptions of factors across the social ecology. Racially diverse middle and high school students (n = 3549) were surveyed over four time points from Spring 2008 to Spring 2013. A latent class analysis was used to identify classes of individuals according to endorsement of traditional and cyber bullying and sexual harassment items in high school. Four classes were identified: (1) high all, consisting of traditional and cyber bullying and sexual harassment perpetration (n = 227); (2) traditional bullying perpetration (n = 604); (3) traditional and cyber bullying perpetration (n = 450); and (4) low all (n = 1,261). Students who reported high levels of anger, self-esteem, empathy, pornographic exposure, and traditional masculinity (individual level), lower levels of social support and parental monitoring (relational level), and higher levels of school belonging (community level) had increased odds of being in the high all class when compared to the other classes. Given the co-occurrence of traditional and cyber bullying and sexual harassment, prevention programming that addresses both forms of aggression across traditional and online contexts may be beneficial. This study also suggests the importance of comprehensive prevention efforts that incorporate approaches at the different ecological levels, such as teaching adolescents healthy emotional and interpersonal skills, and engaging parents in prevention.
青少年不仅在现实生活中,也在网络上实施欺凌和性骚扰行为。然而,对于传统(现实生活中的)欺凌和网络欺凌与性骚扰行为的重叠现象,我们知之甚少。本研究评估了这些形式的攻击在高中阶段的同时发生情况,并根据参与者对社会生态系统中各种因素的看法,确定了中学阶段的预测因素。这项研究调查了来自不同种族的中学生和高中生(n=3549),从 2008 年春季到 2013 年春季,共进行了四个时间点的调查。使用潜在类别分析根据高中时期对传统欺凌和网络欺凌与性骚扰项目的认可程度,确定个体的类别。确定了四个类别:(1)高所有,包括传统和网络欺凌与性骚扰行为(n=227);(2)传统欺凌行为(n=604);(3)传统和网络欺凌行为(n=450);(4)低所有(n=1261)。与其他类别相比,报告高水平愤怒、自尊、同理心、色情内容暴露和传统男子气概(个体水平)、低水平社会支持和父母监督(关系水平)以及高水平学校归属感(社区水平)的学生更有可能属于高所有类别。鉴于传统和网络欺凌与性骚扰行为的同时发生,针对传统和网络背景下这两种形式的攻击的预防计划可能是有益的。本研究还表明,需要采取综合预防措施,将不同生态层面的方法纳入其中,例如教授青少年健康的情感和人际交往技巧,并让家长参与预防工作。