Sports Performance Research Institute New Zealand, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Apr;29(4):484-503. doi: 10.1111/sms.13375. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
Isometric training is used in the rehabilitation and physical preparation of athletes, special populations, and the general public. However, little consensus exists regarding training guidelines for a variety of desired outcomes. Understanding the adaptive response to specific loading parameters would be of benefit to practitioners. The objective of this systematic review, therefore, was to detail the medium- to long-term adaptations of different types of isometric training on morphological, neurological, and performance variables. Exploration of the relevant subject matter was performed through MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL databases. English, full-text, peer-reviewed journal articles and unpublished doctoral dissertations investigating medium- to long-term (≥3 weeks) adaptations to isometric training in humans were identified. These studies were evaluated further for methodological quality. Twenty-six research outputs were reviewed. Isometric training at longer muscle lengths (0.86%-1.69%/week, ES = 0.03-0.09/week) produced greater muscular hypertrophy when compared to equal volumes of shorter muscle length training (0.08%-0.83%/week, ES = -0.003 to 0.07/week). Ballistic intent resulted in greater neuromuscular activation (1.04%-10.5%/week, ES = 0.02-0.31/week vs 1.64%-5.53%/week, ES = 0.03-0.20/week) and rapid force production (1.2%-13.4%/week, ES = 0.05-0.61/week vs 1.01%-8.13%/week, ES = 0.06-0.22/week). Substantial improvements in muscular hypertrophy and maximal force production were reported regardless of training intensity. High-intensity (≥70%) contractions are required for improving tendon structure and function. Additionally, long muscle length training results in greater transference to dynamic performance. Despite relatively few studies meeting the inclusion criteria, this review provides practitioners with insight into which isometric training variables (eg, joint angle, intensity, intent) to manipulate to achieve desired morphological and neuromuscular adaptations.
等长训练被用于运动员、特殊人群和普通人群的康复和身体准备。然而,对于各种预期结果的训练指南,尚未达成共识。了解特定负荷参数的适应反应将使从业者受益。因此,本系统评价的目的是详细描述不同类型的等长训练对形态、神经和运动表现变量的中长期适应。通过 MEDLINE、PubMed、SPORTDiscus 和 CINAHL 数据库进行了相关主题的探索。确定了研究人类中长期(≥3 周)适应等长训练的英文、全文、同行评审的期刊文章和未发表的博士论文。进一步评估了这些研究的方法质量。共审查了 26 项研究结果。与较短肌肉长度训练(0.08%-0.83%/周,ES=-0.003 至 0.07/周)相比,较长肌肉长度(0.86%-1.69%/周,ES=0.03-0.09/周)的等长训练产生了更大的肌肉肥大。弹道意图导致更大的神经肌肉激活(1.04%-10.5%/周,ES=0.02-0.31/周与 1.64%-5.53%/周,ES=0.03-0.20/周)和快速力量产生(1.2%-13.4%/周,ES=0.05-0.61/周与 1.01%-8.13%/周,ES=0.06-0.22/周)。无论训练强度如何,都报告了肌肉肥大和最大力量产生的实质性改善。高强度(≥70%)收缩对于改善肌腱结构和功能是必需的。此外,长肌肉长度训练导致更大的动态性能转移。尽管符合纳入标准的研究相对较少,但本综述为从业者提供了深入了解哪些等长训练变量(例如关节角度、强度、意图)可以进行调整以实现预期的形态和神经肌肉适应的信息。