German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Site Rostock/Greifswald, Germany.
Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(2):527-539. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180244.
Caregivers providing informal care for people with dementia (PwD) often report unmet needs, burden, and health impairments. Optimal support for family dementia caregivers will likely benefit from better understanding and assessment of the prevalence and types of caregivers' unmet needs and associated socio-demographic and clinical characteristics.
The present study investigates 1) the number and types of caregivers' unmet needs, 2) socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of both PwD and caregivers, and 3) caregivers' burden and health-related outcomes that are related to caregivers' unmet needs.
The present analyses are based on cross-sectional data of n = 226 dyads of caregivers and their community-dwelling PwD participating in a comprehensive standardized, computer-based caregivers' needs assessment within a general practitioner (GP)-based, cluster-randomized intervention trial.
A total of n = 505 unmet needs were identified for n = 171 caregivers from the intervention group at baseline. Only 24.3% caregivers reported no unmet need (n = 55), whereas 75.7% caregivers had at least one unmet need (n = 171). Caregivers had on average 2.19 unmet needs (mean = 2.19, SD = 2.15). Specifically, 53.1% of caregivers had one up to three unmet needs (n = 120), 18.6% (n = 42) had three up to six unmet needs, and 4.0% (n = 9) had more than six unmet needs.
Our results underline the importance of a comprehensive needs assessment for family dementia caregivers to develop and implement concepts that can provide family dementia caregivers with optimal support.
为痴呆症患者(PwD)提供非正式护理的照顾者经常报告存在未满足的需求、负担和健康损害。为家庭痴呆症照顾者提供最佳支持可能需要更好地理解和评估照顾者未满足需求的普遍性和类型,以及与社会人口统计学和临床特征相关的情况。
本研究调查了 1)照顾者未满足需求的数量和类型,2)PwD 和照顾者的社会人口统计学和临床特征,3)与照顾者未满足需求相关的照顾者负担和健康相关结果。
本分析基于 226 对照顾者及其居住在社区的 PwD 的横断面数据,这些参与者参与了一项基于全科医生的、基于群组的、随机对照干预试验,进行了全面的标准化计算机化照顾者需求评估。
在基线时,共有 505 项未满足的需求被确定为干预组中的 171 名照顾者。只有 24.3%的照顾者(n=55)报告没有未满足的需求,而 75.7%的照顾者(n=171)至少有一项未满足的需求。照顾者平均有 2.19 项未满足的需求(平均值=2.19,标准差=2.15)。具体而言,53.1%的照顾者有一到三项未满足的需求(n=120),18.6%(n=42)有三到六项未满足的需求,4.0%(n=9)有超过六项未满足的需求。
我们的结果强调了对家庭痴呆症照顾者进行全面需求评估的重要性,以便制定和实施能够为家庭痴呆症照顾者提供最佳支持的概念。