• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Can J Public Health. 2017 Mar;108(2):e214-e216. doi: 10.17269/CJPH.108.5732. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
The breastfeeding support and promotion in Baby-Friendly Maternity Hospitals and Not-as-Yet Baby-Friendly Hospitals in Russia.俄罗斯爱婴妇产医院和非爱婴医院的母乳喂养支持与推广
Breastfeed Med. 2006 Summer;1(2):71-8. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2006.1.71.
3
The Sharjah Baby-Friendly Campaign: A Community-Based Model for Breastfeeding Promotion, Protection, and Support.沙迦爱婴运动:一种基于社区的促进、保护和支持母乳喂养的模式。
Breastfeed Med. 2015 Nov;10(9):437-41. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0095.
4
An historical document analysis of the introduction of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative into the Australian setting.对“爱婴医院倡议”引入澳大利亚背景情况的历史文献分析。
Women Birth. 2017 Feb;30(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
Do baby-friendly hospitals influence breastfeeding duration on a national level?爱婴医院在国家层面上会影响母乳喂养时长吗?
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e702-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0537.
7
Expansion of the baby-friendly hospital initiative ten steps to successful breastfeeding into neonatal intensive care: expert group recommendations.将“baby-friendly hospital initiative”译为“爱婴医院倡议”。 扩充爱婴医院倡议,成功实施新生儿重症监护病房母乳喂养的 10 步措施:专家组建议。
J Hum Lact. 2013 Aug;29(3):300-9. doi: 10.1177/0890334413489775. Epub 2013 May 31.
8
The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative 20 years on: facts, progress, and the way forward.《爱婴医院倡议 20 年:事实、进展和未来方向》
J Hum Lact. 2012 Aug;28(3):272-5. doi: 10.1177/0890334412446690. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
The success of breast feeding.母乳喂养的成功。
IPPF Med Bull. 1984 Oct;18(5):3-4.
10
Factors Influencing Southeastern U.S. Mothers' Participation in Baby-Friendly Practices: A Mixed-Methods Study.影响美国东南部母亲参与婴儿友好实践的因素:混合方法研究。
J Hum Lact. 2018 Nov;34(4):821-834. doi: 10.1177/0890334417750143. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.为有健康足月儿的健康母乳喂养母亲提供支持。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;5(5):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub4.
2
Trade-offs underlying maternal breastfeeding decisions: a conceptual model.母乳喂养决策的权衡:概念模型。
Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Jan;9(1):90-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00378.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
3
The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis.美国母乳喂养不足的负担:儿科成本分析。
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):e1048-56. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1616. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
4
[The factors facilitating and constraining the continuation of breastfeeding in women in Estrie (Quebec)].[魁北克省埃斯特里地区促进和限制女性持续母乳喂养的因素]
Can J Public Health. 2008 May-Jun;99(3):212-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03405476.
5
Supporting breastfeeding mothers: qualitative synthesis.支持母乳喂养的母亲:定性综合研究
J Adv Nurs. 2008 May;62(4):407-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04618.x.
6
The problem with breastfeeding discourse.母乳喂养话题存在的问题。
Can J Public Health. 2006 Sep-Oct;97(5):412-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03405355.

[不可用]。

[Not Available].

作者信息

Lacerte Julie, Levasseur Mélanie, McSween Anne, Provencher Véronique

机构信息

Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

Centre de recherche sur le vieillissement, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie-Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, 1036, rue Belvédère Sud, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 4C4, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2017 Mar;108(2):e214-e216. doi: 10.17269/CJPH.108.5732. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

DOI:10.17269/CJPH.108.5732
PMID:30591997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6972241/
Abstract

Public health concerns associated with infant feeding have prompted the need to increase breastfeeding rates. To do so, initiatives have been implemented and proven successful in raising breastfeeding initiation rates. However, continued breastfeeding according to official recommendations remains scarce and many mothers feel emotionally burdened by their experience. This commentary thus raises the question about the effects of breastfeeding promotion on the well-being of families and takes a critical look at the strategies being put in place. A conceptual model as well as empirical evidences help better understand the balancing act underlying the decisions related to infant feeding and the risks of promoting breastfeeding without providing adequate support. The context of the transition towards a breastfeeding culture requires setting up services adapted to parents' current needs. An approach taking into account their satisfaction and reinforcing their self-efficacy must be adopted, namely through a more thorough implementation of the Baby-Friendly Initiative. Allocating resources allowing for proper enactment of this approach is essential to increase breastfeeding while ensuring families' well-being.

摘要

与婴儿喂养相关的公共卫生问题促使人们需要提高母乳喂养率。为此,已实施了多项举措,且这些举措在提高母乳喂养启动率方面已被证明是成功的。然而,按照官方建议持续进行母乳喂养的情况仍然很少,许多母亲对自己的经历感到情绪负担沉重。因此,这篇评论提出了母乳喂养推广对家庭福祉的影响问题,并对正在实施的策略进行了批判性审视。一个概念模型以及实证证据有助于更好地理解与婴儿喂养相关决策背后的平衡行为,以及在没有提供充分支持的情况下推广母乳喂养的风险。向母乳喂养文化转变的背景要求建立适应父母当前需求的服务。必须采用一种考虑到他们的满意度并增强其自我效能感的方法,即通过更全面地实施爱婴医院倡议。分配资源以确保该方法得以适当实施对于增加母乳喂养同时确保家庭福祉至关重要。