Sustainable Energy Systems Engineering Group, School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW-2109, Australia.
Sustainable Energy Systems Engineering Group, School of Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW-2109, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 1;659:41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.318. Epub 2018 Dec 23.
Gold, silver, lead, zinc, and copper are valuable non-ferrous metals that paved the way for modern civilisation. However, the environmental impacts from their beneficiation stage was always overlooked. This paper analysed the life cycle environmental impacts from the beneficiation process of gold-silver-lead-zinc-copper combined production. The analysis is conducted by utilising the SimaPro software version 8.5. The life cycle assessment methodologies followed are the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) method, the IMPACT 2002+ method, and the Cumulative Energy Demand Method (CED). The most significant impact categories are ecotoxicity, climate change, human toxicity, eutrophication, acidification, and ozone depletion among nearly 15 impact categories which are assessed in this study. The analysis results from the ILCD method indicate that there is a noteworthy impact on ionising radiation caused by the beneficiation process. Out of the five metals considered, gold and silver beneficiation impacts the most while lead‑zinc beneficiation impacts the least. Gold beneficiation has most impacts on the category of climate change and ecosystems. Other major impact categories are ionising radiation, terrestrial eutrophication, photochemical ozone formation, human toxicity, and acidification. The IMPACT 2002+ method shows the overall impact is on ecosystem quality and human health from this combined beneficiation process, dominantly from gold‑silver beneficiation. The life-cycle inventory results show that the blasting process and the amount of electricity consumption in the beneficiation process contribute to cause significant amount of environmental impacts. The comparative impact results are presented and discussed in detail in this paper. Sensitivity analyses are presented based on various electricity grid-mix scenarios and energy-mix scenarios, and the results suggest that electricity grid mix has a dominant effect over the fossil-fuel mix. This paper also highlights the potential steps which could cut down the environmental effects by integrating renewable-energy technologies.
金、银、铅、锌和铜是有价值的有色金属,为现代文明铺平了道路。然而,它们在选矿阶段产生的环境影响却一直被忽视。本文分析了金银铅锌铜综合生产选矿过程的生命周期环境影响。分析采用 SimaPro 软件版本 8.5 进行。遵循的生命周期评估方法是国际参考生命周期数据系统(ILCD)方法、IMPACT 2002+方法和累积能源需求方法(CED)。在本研究评估的近 15 个影响类别中,最显著的影响类别是生态毒性、气候变化、人类毒性、富营养化、酸化和臭氧消耗。ILCD 方法的分析结果表明,选矿过程对电离辐射有显著影响。在所考虑的五种金属中,金和银的选矿影响最大,而铅锌的选矿影响最小。金的选矿对气候变化和生态系统类别影响最大。其他主要影响类别是电离辐射、陆地富营养化、光化学臭氧形成、人类毒性和酸化。IMPACT 2002+方法表明,从这种综合选矿过程来看,总体影响是对生态系统质量和人类健康的影响,主要来自金银选矿。生命周期清单结果表明,爆破过程和选矿过程中的用电量是造成大量环境影响的原因。本文详细介绍和讨论了比较影响结果。根据不同的电网组合情景和能源组合情景进行了敏感性分析,结果表明,电网组合对化石燃料组合的影响占主导地位。本文还强调了通过整合可再生能源技术可以减少环境影响的潜在步骤。