Philip Phinse Mappalakayil, Kannan Srinivasan, Parambil Neetu Ambali
Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Nov 27;7:141. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_145_18. eCollection 2018.
Noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention is emerging as a public health priority in developing countries. For better health outcome in these countries, it is necessary to understand the different community-based interventions developed and implemented across the world.
The objective of the current review is to identify the best strategies used in community-based health intervention (CBHI) programs across the world.
For review, we searched in PubMed and Google Scholar with the keywords "community based," "health interventions," "health promotions," "primary prevention," chronic diseases," "lifestyle-related diseases," and "NCD." Data were extracted using predesigned data extraction form. CBHI studies detailing their intervention strategies only were included in the review.
Out of 35 articles reviewed, 14 (40%) were randomized control trials, while 18 (51.4%) were quasi-experimental design. Individual level ( = 14), group level ( = 5), community level ( = 6), and policy level ( = 4) intervention strategies were identified. Twenty-three (64%) studies were based on interventions for 1 year and above. Twenty-eight (80%) studies were intervened among specific populations such as Latinos and so on.
Successful programs advocate for a package or a chain of interventions than a single intervention. The type of interventions at different levels, namely individual, group, community, and policy levels vary across studies, but individual, and group level interventions are more frequently used.
在发展中国家,非传染性疾病(NCD)预防正成为公共卫生的重点。为了在这些国家取得更好的健康成果,有必要了解世界各地制定和实施的不同社区干预措施。
本次综述的目的是确定世界各地基于社区的健康干预(CBHI)项目中使用的最佳策略。
为进行综述,我们在PubMed和谷歌学术上搜索了关键词“基于社区”、“健康干预”、“健康促进”、“一级预防”、“慢性病”、“生活方式相关疾病”和“非传染性疾病”。使用预先设计的数据提取表提取数据。综述仅纳入详细阐述其干预策略的CBHI研究。
在35篇综述文章中,14篇(40%)为随机对照试验,18篇(51.4%)为准实验设计。确定了个体层面(=14)、群体层面(=5)、社区层面(=6)和政策层面(=4)的干预策略。23项(64%)研究基于为期1年及以上的干预措施。28项(80%)研究针对特定人群(如拉丁裔等)进行干预。
成功的项目提倡采用一套或一系列干预措施,而不是单一干预措施。不同层面(即个体、群体、社区和政策层面)的干预类型因研究而异,但个体和群体层面的干预措施使用更为频繁。