• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因素分析模型中标准化均方根残差与模型误设定的关系。

The Relationship Between the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Model Misspecification in Factor Analysis Models.

机构信息

a University of South Carolina.

b University of Barcelona.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):676-694. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221. Epub 2018 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221
PMID:30596259
Abstract

We argue that the definition of close fitting models should embody the notion of substantially ignorable misspecifications (SIM). A SIM model is a misspecified model that might be selected, based on parsimony, over the true model should knowledge of the true model be available. Because in applications the true model (i.e., the data generating mechanism) is unknown, we investigate the relationship between the population standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) values and various model misspecifications in factor analysis models to better understand the magnitudes of the SRMR. Summary effect sizes of misfit such as the SRMR are necessarily insensitive to some non-ignorable localized misspecifications (i.e., the presence of a few large residual correlations in large models). Localized misspecifications may be identified by examining the largest standardized residual covariance. Based on the findings, our population reference values for close fit are based on a two-index strategy: (1) largest absolute value of standardized residual covariance ≤0.10, and (2) SRMR ≤0.05× the average R of the manifest variables; for acceptable fit our values are 0.15 and 0.10× , respectively.

摘要

我们认为,紧密拟合模型的定义应该体现可忽略性误设(SIM)的概念。SIM 模型是一种误设的模型,如果基于简约性,在有真实模型的知识的情况下,它可能会被选择而不是真实模型。由于在应用中,真实模型(即数据生成机制)是未知的,我们研究了因子分析模型中总体标准化均方根残差(SRMR)值与各种模型误设之间的关系,以更好地理解 SRMR 的大小。拟合不良的综合效应大小,如 SRMR,必然对一些不可忽略的局部误设不敏感(即大模型中存在一些大的残差相关)。可以通过检查最大标准化残差协方差来识别局部误设。基于这些发现,我们将适合人群的紧密拟合的参考值基于两指标策略:(1)最大标准化残差协方差绝对值≤0.10;(2)SRMR≤0.05× 显变量的平均 R;对于可接受的拟合度,我们的值分别为 0.15 和 0.10× 。

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual and Model Misspecification in Factor Analysis Models.因素分析模型中标准化均方根残差与模型误设定的关系。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):676-694. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1476221. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
2
Evaluating SEM Model Fit with Small Degrees of Freedom.用小自由度评估 SEM 模型拟合度。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2022 Mar-May;57(2-3):179-207. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
3
Population performance of SEM parceling strategies under measurement and structural model misspecification.在测量和结构模型误设定下,SEM 分区策略的人口表现。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):348-368. doi: 10.1037/met0000072. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
The Effect of Estimation Methods on SEM Fit Indices.估计方法对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Jun;80(3):421-445. doi: 10.1177/0013164419885164. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
5
Masking misfit in confirmatory factor analysis by increasing unique variances: a cautionary note on the usefulness of cutoff values of fit indices.通过增加独特方差来掩饰验证性因素分析中的不匹配:对拟合指数临界值有用性的警示。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Sep;16(3):319-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024917.
6
The Influence of Number of Categories and Threshold Values on Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Ordered Categorical Data.结构方程模型中有序分类数据的类目数和阈值值对适配度指数的影响。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):731-755. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1480346. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
7
Detecting Misspecified Multilevel Structural Equation Models with Common Fit Indices: A Monte Carlo Study.使用常见拟合指数检测误设的多层结构方程模型:一项蒙特卡罗研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(2):197-215. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.977429.
8
A Limited Information Estimator for Dynamic Factor Models.动态因子模型的有限信息估计量。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Mar-Apr;54(2):246-263. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1519406. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
9
Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.使用标准化均方根残差(SRMR)评估结构方程模型中的精确拟合度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):110-130. doi: 10.1177/0013164420926231. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
10
On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modeling.结构方程建模中适配度度量的一致性和非一致性。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Jun;23(2):318-336. doi: 10.1037/met0000122. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Opportunities for alcohol and cannabis use among youth: psychometric properties of novel measures.青少年饮酒和使用大麻的机会:新测量方法的心理测量特性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 29;13(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03384-7.
2
Associations between pain experiences and gray matter volume in youth in the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study.青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究中青少年疼痛经历与灰质体积之间的关联。
J Pain. 2025 Aug 12;36:105527. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105527.
3
Mediating role of Social Support and Self-efficacy on Academic stress and Student's Psychological well-being among University Students in Mogadishu -Somalia.
社会支持与自我效能感对索马里摩加迪沙大学生学业压力和心理健康的中介作用
F1000Res. 2025 May 30;13:1108. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.155275.2. eCollection 2024.
4
A multidimensional quiet quitting scale: Development and test of a measure of quiet quitting.一个多维的“隐性离职”量表:“隐性离职”测量方法的开发与测试
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 15;20(4):e0317624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317624. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparison of the multivariate genetic architecture of eight major psychiatric disorders across sex.八种主要精神疾病跨性别的多变量遗传结构比较。
Nat Genet. 2025 Mar;57(3):583-590. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02093-6. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
6
Translation and validation of the Nature Relatedness Scale to German.《自然关联量表》德语版的翻译与验证。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1507983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1507983. eCollection 2024.
7
Parent, Teacher, and Youth Reports on Measures of Reactive and Proactive Aggression.家长、教师和青少年关于反应性攻击和主动性攻击测量的报告。
Child Youth Care Forum. 2024 Aug;53(4):957-979. doi: 10.1007/s10566-023-09780-7. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
8
Examining the role of personality functioning in a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology using two years of ambulatory assessed data.使用两年的动态评估数据,在精神病理学的层级分类中检验人格功能的作用。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 24;14(1):340. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03046-z.
9
Analyzing Multiple Social Determinants of Health Using Different Clustering Methods.分析使用不同聚类方法的多个健康社会决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jan 28;21(2):145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020145.
10
Dimensionality assessment in the presence of wording effects: A network psychometric and factorial approach.存在措辞效应时的维度评估:网络心理计量学和因素分析方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6179-6197. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02348-w. Epub 2024 Feb 20.