• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间感知中的序列依赖性。

Serial dependence in timing perception.

作者信息

Roseboom Warrick

机构信息

University of Sussex.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):100-110. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000591.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000591
PMID:30596435
Abstract

Recent sensory history affects subsequent experience. Behavioral results have demonstrated this effect in two forms: repeated exposure to the same sensory input produces negative aftereffects wherein sensory stimuli like those previously experienced are judged as less like the exposed stimulation, while singular exposures can produce positive aftereffects wherein judgments are more like previously experienced stimulation. For timing perception, there is controversy regarding the influence of recent exposure-both singular and repeated exposure produce apparently negative aftereffects-often referred to as temporal recalibration and rapid temporal recalibration, respectively. While negative aftereffects have been found following repeated exposure for all timing tasks, following a single exposure, they have only been demonstrated using synchrony judgments (SJs). Here, we examine the influence of a single presentation-serial dependence for timing-for standard timing tasks: SJ, temporal order judgments, and magnitude estimation judgments. We found that serial dependence produced apparently negative aftereffects in SJ, but positive aftereffects in temporal order judgment and magnitude estimation judgment. We propose that these findings, and those following repeated exposure, can be reconciled within a framework wherein negative aftereffects occur at sensory layers, consistent with classical depictions of sensory adaptation, and Bayesian-like positive aftereffects operate across different, higher, decision levels. These findings are consistent with the aftereffects known from other perceptual dimensions and provide a general framework for interpreting positive (serial dependence) and negative (sensory adaptation) aftereffects across different tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

近期的感官体验会影响后续的经历。行为学研究结果已通过两种形式证实了这种影响:反复接触相同的感官输入会产生负面后效应,即与先前经历过的感官刺激相似的刺激会被判定为与暴露的刺激不太相似;而单次接触则可能产生正面后效应,即判断更类似于先前经历过的刺激。对于时间感知而言,关于近期接触的影响存在争议——单次和反复接触都会产生明显的负面后效应,通常分别称为时间重新校准和快速时间重新校准。虽然在所有时间任务中反复接触后都发现了负面后效应,但在单次接触后,仅在同步判断(SJ)中得到了证实。在此,我们研究了单次呈现——时间的序列依赖性——对标准时间任务的影响:SJ、时间顺序判断和大小估计判断。我们发现,序列依赖性在SJ中产生了明显的负面后效应,但在时间顺序判断和大小估计判断中产生了正面后效应。我们提出,这些发现以及反复接触后的发现,可以在一个框架内得到调和,即负面后效应发生在感官层面,这与经典的感官适应描述一致,而类似贝叶斯的正面后效应则在不同的、更高的决策层面起作用。这些发现与其他感知维度中已知的后效应一致,并为解释不同任务中的正面(序列依赖性)和负面(感官适应)后效应提供了一个通用框架。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2018美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Serial dependence in timing perception.时间感知中的序列依赖性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):100-110. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000591.
2
The consistency of crossmodal synchrony perception across the visual, auditory, and tactile senses.跨视觉、听觉和触觉感官的跨模态同步感知的一致性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jul;42(7):1026-38. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000191. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
Rapid recalibration of temporal order judgements: Response bias accounts for contradictory results.快速重新校准时间顺序判断:反应偏差解释了矛盾的结果。
Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Apr;51(7):1697-1710. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14551. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Neural correlates of audiovisual temporal processing--comparison of temporal order and simultaneity judgments.视听时间处理的神经关联——时间顺序与同时性判断的比较
Neuroscience. 2015 Aug 6;300:432-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Simultaneity and Temporal Order Judgments Exhibit Distinct Reaction Times and Training Effects.同时性和时间顺序判断表现出不同的反应时间和训练效果。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 12;11(1):e0145926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145926. eCollection 2016.
6
Converging evidence that common timing processes underlie temporal-order and simultaneity judgments: a model-based analysis.越来越多的证据表明,共同的时间处理过程是时间顺序和同时性判断的基础:基于模型的分析。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1750-66. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0869-6.
7
Recalibration of perceived time across sensory modalities.跨感觉通道的感知时间重新校准。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;185(2):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1282-3. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
8
Causality shifts the perceived temporal order of audiovisual events.因果关系改变了视听事件的感知时间顺序。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Sep;46(9):890-900. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000754. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
9
The Impact of Feedback on the Different Time Courses of Multisensory Temporal Recalibration.反馈对多感官时间重新校准不同时间进程的影响。
Neural Plast. 2017;2017:3478742. doi: 10.1155/2017/3478742. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
10
Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.注意力调节多感官时间感知的可塑性。
Eur J Neurosci. 2010 May;31(10):1755-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07194.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the role of serial dependence in visual time perception.探索序列依赖性在视觉时间感知中的作用。
J Vis. 2025 Jul 1;25(8):7. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.8.7.
2
Choice- and trial-history effects on causality perception in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder.选择和试验历史对精神分裂症谱系障碍因果关系感知的影响。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Apr 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00614-0.
3
Recent, but not long-term, priors induce behavioral oscillations in peri-saccadic vision.近期而非长期的先验信息会在扫视周围视觉中引发行为振荡。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 17;3(1):41. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00224-7.
4
Cortical neurite microstructural correlates of time perception in healthy older adults.健康老年人时间感知的皮质神经突微观结构相关性
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 6;10(12):e32534. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32534. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
5
No effect of spatial congruence on rapid temporal recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony.空间一致性对视听时距误差快速时间校准无影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Aug;31(4):1615-1626. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02441-9. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
The effect of perceptual history on the interpretation of causality.知觉历史对因果关系解释的影响。
J Vis. 2022 Oct 4;22(11):13. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.11.13.
7
Musical training refines audiovisual integration but does not influence temporal recalibration.音乐训练能改善视听整合,但不会影响时间校准。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 12;12(1):15292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19665-9.
8
Visual field differences in temporal synchrony processing for audio-visual stimuli.时相关同步处理视听刺激的视野差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261129. eCollection 2021.
9
Temporal dynamics of implicit memory underlying serial dependence.序列依赖背后内隐记忆的时间动态。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):449-458. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01221-x. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
Serial dependence revealed in history-dependent perceptual templates.历史依赖型知觉模板中显现的序列依赖现象。
Curr Biol. 2021 Jul 26;31(14):3185-3191.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Jun 3.