Suppr超能文献

基于概率期望的二阶单一物抑制证据。

Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.

作者信息

Won Bo-Yeong, Kosoyan Mary, Geng Joy J

机构信息

Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):125-138. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000594.

Abstract

Decades of research in attention have shown that salient distractors (e.g., a color singleton) tend to capture attention. However, in most studies, singleton distractors are just as likely to be present as absent. We therefore have little knowledge of how probabilistic expectations of the salient distractor's occurrence and features affect suppression. In three experiments, we explored this question by manipulating the frequency of a singleton distractor and the variability of its color within a search display. We found that increased expectations regarding the occurrence of the singleton distractor eliminated the singleton response time cost and reduced the number of first saccades to the singleton. In contrast, expectations regarding variability in the singleton color did not affect singleton capture. This was surprising and suggests the ability to suppress second-order salience over and above that of first-order features. We next inserted the probe display that included a to-be-reported letter inside each shape between search trials to measure if attention went to multiple objects. The letter in the singleton location was reported less often in the high-frequency condition, suggesting proactive suppression of expected singleton. Additionally, we found that trial-to-trial repetitions of a singleton (irrespective of its color and location) facilitated performance (i.e., singleton repetition priming), but repetitions of its specific color or location did not. Together our findings demonstrate that attentional capture by a color singleton distractor is attenuated by probabilistic expectations of its occurrence, but not of its color and location. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

数十年来对注意力的研究表明,显著的干扰项(例如,一个颜色独特的物体)往往会吸引注意力。然而,在大多数研究中,独特干扰项出现和不出现的可能性是一样的。因此,我们对显著干扰项出现的概率预期及其特征如何影响抑制作用知之甚少。在三个实验中,我们通过操纵搜索显示中独特干扰项的频率及其颜色的可变性来探究这个问题。我们发现,对独特干扰项出现的预期增加会消除独特干扰项的反应时间成本,并减少首次扫视到独特干扰项的次数。相比之下,对独特干扰项颜色可变性的预期并不影响对独特干扰项的捕捉。这很令人惊讶,并表明在抑制一阶特征之上的二阶显著性的能力。接下来,我们在搜索试验之间插入包含每个形状内有待报告字母的探测显示,以测量注意力是否指向多个物体。在高频条件下,独特干扰项位置的字母被报告的频率较低,这表明对预期独特干扰项的主动抑制。此外,我们发现独特干扰项的逐次重复(无论其颜色和位置如何)都有助于提高表现(即独特干扰项重复启动),但其特定颜色或位置的重复则不然。我们的研究结果共同表明,颜色独特干扰项引起的注意力捕捉会因其出现的概率预期而减弱,但不会因其颜色和位置的预期而减弱。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2018 美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):125-138. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000594.
2
Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000613.
3
Expectations and perceptual priming in a visual search task: Evidence from eye movements and behavior.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Apr;45(4):489-499. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000618. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
4
Does it help to expect distraction? Attentional capture is attenuated by high distractor frequency but not by trial-to-trial predictability.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Mar;48(3):246-261. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000986. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.
Psychol Sci. 2019 Dec;30(12):1724-1732. doi: 10.1177/0956797619878813. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020).
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Jun;49(6):852-861. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001119.
8
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000472.
10
Secondary capture: Salience information persistently drives attentional selection.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Sep;50(9):942-951. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001223.

引用本文的文献

1
First encounters: Estimating the initial magnitude of attentional capture.
Vis cogn. 2024 Oct-Dec;32(9-10):822-844. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2024.2315806. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Lingering on Distraction: Examining Distractor Rejection in Adults with ADHD.
Vis cogn. 2024;32(9-10):910-924. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2024.2328379. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Signal suppression 2.0: An updated account of attentional capture and suppression.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02736-z.
4
Expectations don't protect us from emotional distractions.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03085-8.
5
Restoring a top-down control assumption: Salience effects in working memory are overcome with time.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Aug;154(8):2301-2317. doi: 10.1037/xge0001776. Epub 2025 May 15.
6
Learned distractor rejection: Robust but surprisingly rapid.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1132-1149. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03051-4. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
7
How robust is categorial distractor suppression? Assessing the impact of additional categories and increased set size.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May;87(4):1162-1178. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03056-z. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
8
Unpredictable singleton distractors in visual search can be subject to second-order suppression.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):832-847. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03028-3. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
9
Diverse neuronal activity patterns contribute to the control of distraction in the prefrontal and parietal cortex.
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 27;23(1):e3003008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003008. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
The degree of parallel/serial processing affects stimulus-driven and memory-driven attentional capture: Evidence for the attentional window account.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):384-398. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-03003-4. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jul;44(7):1128-1141. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000521. Epub 2018 May 7.
2
How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):860-870. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z.
3
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):13-17. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000472.
4
Rejecting salient distractors: Generalization from experience.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):485-499. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1465-8.
5
The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
Cortex. 2018 May;102:67-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.027. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
Distinguishing among potential mechanisms of singleton suppression.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Apr;44(4):626-644. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000484. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
8
Don't let it distract you: how information about the availability of reward affects attentional selection.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Nov;79(8):2275-2298. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1376-8.
9
Presaccadic target competition attenuates distraction.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1087-1096. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1288-7.
10
The Role of Alpha Activity in Spatial and Feature-Based Attention.
eNeuro. 2016 Oct 5;3(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0204-16.2016. eCollection 2016 Sep-Oct.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验