Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missour.
Section of Pediatric Palliative Care, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;125(8):1365-1372. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31939. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Despite growing evidence and support for shared decision making, little is known about the experiences of parents who hold more active roles than they wish.
This was a prospective cohort study of 372 parents of children with cancer and their oncologists at 2 academic pediatric hospitals. Parents were surveyed within 12 weeks of the diagnosis, and they were assessed for associated factors and outcomes of holding a more active decision-making role than they preferred. Parents were asked about their preferred and actual roles in decision making. Oncologists were asked to estimate parental preferences.
Most parents preferred to share decision making with the oncologist (64% [236 of 372]); however, 13% (49 of 372) preferred oncologist-led decision making. Most parents fulfilled their ideal decision-making role (66% [244 of 372]), but a notable minority were either more involved (14% [52 of 372]) or less involved than they preferred (20% [76 of 372]; P < .0001 [McNemar test]). Oncologists recognized parents' preferred roles in 49% of cases (167 of 341); 24% (82 of 341) of parents preferred more active roles than the oncologist recognized, and 27% (92 of 341) preferred less active roles than recognized. No parent or communication characteristics were found that were associated with parents' holding a more active role than desired in decision making. Parents who held more active roles in decision making than they wished had higher odds of decisional regret (odds ratio, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-6.80; P < .0001).
Although many parents fulfill their desired roles in decision making about their child's cancer, some are asked to take on more active roles than they wish. Holding a more active role than desired may lead to increased decisional regret.
尽管越来越多的证据和支持表明应该共同做出决策,但对于那些希望扮演比实际更积极角色的父母的经历却知之甚少。
这是一项针对 2 所学术儿科医院的 372 名癌症患儿的父母及其肿瘤医生的前瞻性队列研究。在诊断后 12 周内对父母进行调查,并评估他们承担比期望更积极的决策角色的相关因素和结果。父母被问及他们在决策中的理想角色和实际角色。肿瘤医生被要求估计父母的偏好。
大多数父母希望与肿瘤医生共同做出决策(64%[372 例中的 236 例]);然而,13%(372 例中的 49 例)希望由肿瘤医生主导决策。大多数父母履行了他们理想的决策角色(66%[372 例中的 244 例]),但少数父母的参与程度超出(14%[372 例中的 52 例])或低于他们的期望(20%[372 例中的 76 例];P<.0001[McNemar 检验])。肿瘤医生在 49%的情况下识别出父母的首选角色(341 例中的 167 例);24%(341 例中的 82 例)的父母希望扮演比肿瘤医生认为更积极的角色,而 27%(341 例中的 92 例)希望扮演比识别出的角色更消极的角色。没有发现父母或沟通特征与父母在决策中扮演比期望更积极的角色有关。在决策中扮演比期望更积极角色的父母更有可能感到决策后悔(优势比,3.75;95%置信区间,2.07-6.80;P<.0001)。
尽管许多父母在决定孩子癌症的过程中履行了他们期望的角色,但有些父母被要求扮演比他们希望的更积极的角色。承担比期望更积极的角色可能会导致决策后悔增加。