• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis to chemicals.

作者信息

Uttlová P, Urban J, Melicherčíková V, Zavadilová J, Fabiánová K

出版信息

Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2018 Winter;67(3):122-128.

PMID:30602279
Abstract

THE AIM OF STUDY

To test clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis from the National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis and Diphtheria for susceptibility to commonly available disinfectants. Another aim was to determine the concentration and exposure time for each chemical under real conditions of use and possibly to detect the emergence of resistance to disinfectants among 34 strains of B. pertussis referred to the National Reference Laboratory for Pertussis and Diphtheria in 2014 and 2015.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 34 clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis were tested for susceptibility to chemical disinfectants by three different methods. The microsuspension method was used for the primary screening, and the tests were carried out without protein contamination. Further testing was conducted in accordance with standard EN 14885, where the test procedure consists of several steps. Step 1 involves quantitative suspension methods (Phase 2, Step 1), and step 2 uses methods designed for practice (Phase 2, Step 2). The quantitative suspension method modified according to EN 13727+A2 was used in step 1 to confirm bactericidal activity of the test products under the dirty conditions. In step 2, clinical isolates were tested using a quantitative carrier test method under the dirty conditions modified according to EN 14561. Based on this standard, the real conditions of product use are simulated. Four disinfectants differing in composition and intended use were tested.

RESULTS

Disinfectant No. 1 showed bactericidal activity at a concentration of 0.5% after 2 min of exposure in the case of immersion or at a concentration of 5% after 2 min of exposure when treated by wiping. Disinfectant No. 2 was active at a concentration of 0.1% after 2 min of exposure or at a concentration of 1% after 2 min of exposure, respectively. Disinfectant No. 3 did not show bactericidal activity even at a concentration of 100% after 5 min of exposure. Disinfectant No. 4 showed bactericidal activity at a concentration of 10% after 5 min of exposure or at a concentration of 30% after 2 min of exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the strains tested was resistant. Using the methods that simulate the real conditions of use of disinfectants Nos. 1 and 2, it was possible to determine the concentration and exposure time needed to achieve disinfection of surfaces under the dirty conditions. Disinfectants Nos. 3 and 4 are not primarily intended for the treatment of surfaces but for the treatment of the skin and mucous membranes. The results obtained with the latter two products are interesting but inconclusive as the real conditions of their use were not simulated accurately. KEYWORDS Bordetella pertussis - susceptibility - disinfectants.

摘要

相似文献

1
Susceptibility of clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis to chemicals.
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2018 Winter;67(3):122-128.
2
Hand disinfectants and their activity against clinical isolates of Bordetella pertussis.手部消毒剂及其对百日咳博德特氏菌临床分离株的活性。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2022 Dec;30(4):230-234. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a7141.
3
Comparative testing of disinfectant efficacy on planktonic bacteria and bacterial biofilms using a new assay based on kinetic analysis of metabolic activity.使用基于代谢活性动力学分析的新方法对浮游细菌和细菌生物膜进行消毒剂功效的比较测试。
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Mar;122(3):625-633. doi: 10.1111/jam.13358. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.两种市售制剂用于兽医学中对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌消毒的适用性。
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2009 May;116(5):180-5.
5
Do European Standard Disinfectant tests truly simulate in-use microbial and organic soiling conditions on food preparation surfaces?欧洲标准消毒剂测试真的能模拟食品制备表面实际使用中的微生物和有机污染情况吗?
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Apr;108(4):1344-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04530.x. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
6
[Susceptibility to macrolide antibiotics of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis strains isolated from whooping cough patients in 1968 and in 1997-99].[1968年以及1997 - 1999年从百日咳患者中分离出的百日咳博德特氏菌和副百日咳博德特氏菌菌株对大环内酯类抗生素的敏感性]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2001;53(1):39-43.
7
In vitro evaluation of six chemical agents on smooth Brucella melitensis strain.六种化学试剂对光滑型羊布鲁氏菌菌株的体外评价
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015 Mar 21;14:16. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0077-1.
8
Correlation between reduced susceptibility to disinfectants and multidrug resistance among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter species.临床分离的不动杆菌属对消毒剂的敏感性降低与多重耐药的相关性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Sep;65(9):1975-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq227. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
9
Glucoprotamin antimicrobial activity against selected standard antibiotic-resistant bacteria and reference strains used in the assessment of disinfection efficacy.葡糖鱼精蛋白对选定的标准抗生素耐药菌及用于消毒效果评估的参考菌株的抗菌活性。
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 2015;66(3):281-8.
10
[The determination of the bacterial effectiveness of surface disinfectants using suspension tests].[使用悬液试验测定表面消毒剂的细菌有效性]
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1991 Mar;191(2-3):206-15.