Suppr超能文献

探索早发性胃癌与传统发病胃癌之间的差异。

Exploring the differences between early-onset gastric cancer and traditional-onset gastric cancer.

作者信息

Giryes Anwar, Oweira Hani, Mannhart Meinrad, Decker Michael, Abdel-Rahman Omar

机构信息

Swiss Medical Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland.

Gastrointestinal Tumor Zentrum, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018 Dec;9(6):1157-1163. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.06.11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current study sought to explore the potential clinical, epidemiological and genetic differences between early-onset gastric cancer (E-gastric cancer: defined as 20-39 years) and traditional-onset gastric cancer (T-gastric cancer: defined as ≥40 years).

METHODS

Datasets from the following sources were searched: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database [2000-2014], Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA). Clinicopathological characteristics, trends, and genetic findings were compared between E-gastric cancer and T-gastric cancer. Moreover, correlations with relevant risk factors were sought after.

RESULTS

A total of 95,323 gastric cancer patients were identified in the period from 2000 to 2014. While T-gastric cancer was decreasing during the study period (-1.4; P<0.05), E-gastric cancer was stable during the study period. E-gastric cancer is less prevalent in males (51.1% 61.0%; P<0.0001), and white patients (68.9% 71.4%; P<0.0001). E-gastric cancer patients usually present with poorly differentiated histology (55.3% 48.0%; P<0.0001) as well as more aggressive histological subtypes (e.g., diffuse histology or linitis plastica). No difference can be detected with regards to risk factor correlations between E-gastric cancer and T-gastric cancer. Only four patients with E-gastric cancer were available in the provisional TCGA dataset at the time of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

E-gastric cancer is a potentially distinct disease entity with specific clinicopathological and trend patterns compared to conventional T-gastric cancer. Further studies are needed to explore the potential etiologic basis as well as to investigate the clinical consequences of this distinction. The impact of this distinction on minority populations requires further assessment as well.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨早发性胃癌(E 型胃癌:定义为 20 - 39 岁)与传统发病胃癌(T 型胃癌:定义为≥40 岁)之间潜在的临床、流行病学及遗传学差异。

方法

检索了以下来源的数据集:监测、流行病学与最终结果数据库[2000 - 2014]、行为危险因素监测调查以及癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)。比较了 E 型胃癌和 T 型胃癌的临床病理特征、趋势及遗传学发现。此外,还探寻了与相关危险因素的相关性。

结果

2000 年至 2014 年期间共识别出 95323 例胃癌患者。在研究期间,T 型胃癌呈下降趋势(-1.4;P<0.05),而 E 型胃癌则保持稳定。E 型胃癌在男性(51.1%对 61.0%;P<0.0001)和白人患者(68.9%对 71.4%;P<0.0001)中患病率较低。E 型胃癌患者通常表现为低分化组织学类型(55.3%对 48.0%;P<0.0001)以及更具侵袭性的组织学亚型(如弥漫性组织学类型或皮革胃)。在 E 型胃癌和 T 型胃癌的危险因素相关性方面未检测到差异。在研究时,临时 TCGA 数据集中仅有 4 例 E 型胃癌患者。

结论

与传统的 T 型胃癌相比,E 型胃癌是一种具有特定临床病理和趋势模式的潜在独特疾病实体。需要进一步研究以探索其潜在病因基础,并调查这种差异的临床后果。这种差异对少数族裔人群的影响也需要进一步评估。

相似文献

2
Early-onset Colorectal Cancer is Distinct From Traditional Colorectal Cancer.早发性结直肠癌有别于传统结直肠癌。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Dec;16(4):293-299.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Young Patients with Gastric Cancer in the United States and China.中美两国年轻胃癌患者的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(13):3964-3971. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6073-2. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
Toward a Shared Vision for Cancer Genomic Data.迈向癌症基因组数据的共同愿景。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1109-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607591.
7
Current issues and future perspectives of gastric cancer screening.胃癌筛查的当前问题与未来展望
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13767-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13767.
8
Characteristics of gastric cancer in Asia.亚洲胃癌的特征。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 28;20(16):4483-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4483.
10
Gastric cancer in young patients.年轻患者的胃癌
Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:981654. doi: 10.1155/2013/981654. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验