• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳入人格数据的健康风险预测模型:动机、挑战及实例。

Health risk prediction models incorporating personality data: Motivation, challenges, and illustration.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center.

Department of Psychiatry, School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2019 Jan;10(1):46-58. doi: 10.1037/per0000300.

DOI:10.1037/per0000300
PMID:30604983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6319275/
Abstract

The age of "big data" in health has ushered in an era of prediction models promising to forecast individual health events. Although many models focus on enhancing the predictive power of medical risk factors with genomic data, a recent proposal is to augment traditional health predictors with psychosocial data, such as personality measures. In this article we provide a general overview of the medical risk prediction models and then discuss the rationale for integrating personality data. We suggest three principles that should guide work in this area if personality data is ultimately to be useful within risk prediction as it is actually practiced in the health care system. These include (a) prediction of specific, priority health outcomes; (b) sufficient incremental validity beyond established biomedical risk factors; and (c) technically responsible model-building that does not overfit the data. We then illustrate the application of these principles in the development of a personality-augmented prediction model for the occurrence of mild cognitive impairment, designed for a primary care setting. We evaluate the results, drawing conclusions for the direction an iterative, programmatic approach would need to take to eventually achieve clinical utility. Although there is great potential for personality measurement to play a key role in the coming era of risk prediction models, the final section reviews the many challenges that must be faced in real-world implementation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

健康领域的“大数据”时代迎来了一个充满希望的时代,预测模型可以预测个人健康事件。尽管许多模型专注于利用基因组数据来提高医疗风险因素的预测能力,但最近有人提议用心理社会数据(如人格测量)来扩充传统的健康预测因素。在本文中,我们对医学风险预测模型进行了概述,然后讨论了整合人格数据的基本原理。如果人格数据最终要像在医疗保健系统中实际应用的那样,对风险预测有用,我们建议在该领域开展工作时应遵循三个原则。这些原则包括:(a)预测特定的、优先的健康结果;(b)在既定的生物医学风险因素之外具有足够的增量有效性;(c)技术上负责任的模型构建,避免过度拟合数据。然后,我们将这些原则应用于一个用于轻度认知障碍发生的人格增强预测模型的开发,该模型设计用于初级保健环境。我们评估了结果,为迭代、计划性方法的方向得出结论,以最终实现临床应用。尽管人格测量在即将到来的风险预测模型时代具有很大的潜力,但最后一部分回顾了在实际实施中必须面对的许多挑战。(美国心理协会,2019)

相似文献

1
Health risk prediction models incorporating personality data: Motivation, challenges, and illustration.纳入人格数据的健康风险预测模型:动机、挑战及实例。
Personal Disord. 2019 Jan;10(1):46-58. doi: 10.1037/per0000300.
2
Survival Analysis in Cognitively Normal Subjects and in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Proportional Hazards Model with Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression.使用极端梯度提升回归的比例风险模型对认知正常受试者和轻度认知障碍患者进行生存分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(2):837-850. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215266.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
An evaluation of DSM-5 Section III personality disorder Criterion A (impairment) in accounting for psychopathology.DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍标准 A(损害)在解释精神病理学方面的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Oct;31(10):1181-1191. doi: 10.1037/pas0000620.
5
Validating the role of the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) and a genetic risk score in progression to cognitive impairment in a population-based cohort of older adults followed for 12 years.在一个对老年人进行了12年随访的基于人群的队列中,验证澳大利亚国立大学阿尔茨海默病风险指数(ANU-ADRI)和遗传风险评分在进展为认知障碍中的作用。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Mar 4;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0240-3.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
[Prediction of Alzheimer's dementia].[阿尔茨海默病性痴呆的预测]
Nervenarzt. 2014 Oct;85(10):1233-7. doi: 10.1007/s00115-014-4064-0.
8
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
9
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.下一个大五人格量表(BFI-2):开发和评估一个具有 15 个方面的层次模型,以提高带宽、保真度和预测能力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):117-143. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
10
Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.利用临床、生化和超声标志物预测子痫前期的模型的验证和建立:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Dec;24(72):1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta24720.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioural and psychological factors associated with pre-frailty in community-dwelling adults aged 40 and over: a cross-sectional study.40岁及以上社区居住成年人中与衰弱前期相关的行为和心理因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):956. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21957-4.
2
Non-Invasive Cancer Detection Using Blood Test and Predictive Modeling Approach.使用血液检测和预测建模方法进行非侵入性癌症检测。
Adv Appl Bioinform Chem. 2025 Jan 10;17:159-178. doi: 10.2147/AABC.S488604. eCollection 2024.
3
Mortality Risk Prediction Models for People With Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Neuroticism Traits Selectively Impact Long Term Illness Course and Cognitive Decline in Late-Life Depression.神经质特质对老年抑郁症的长期病程和认知衰退有选择性影响。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;25(3):220-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
2
Statistical learning theory for high dimensional prediction: Application to criterion-keyed scale development.高维预测的统计学习理论:在标准关联量表编制中的应用。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Dec;21(4):603-620. doi: 10.1037/met0000088. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
3
The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): a Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets.
肾衰竭患者的死亡风险预测模型:一项系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453190. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53190.
4
Prognostic prediction models for adverse birth outcomes: A systematic review.预测不良出生结局的预后预测模型:系统评价。
J Glob Health. 2024 Oct 25;14:04214. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04214.
5
Diligent for better or worse: Conscientiousness is associated with higher likelihood of suicidal behavior and more severe suicidal intent in later life.勤勉有加:尽责性与晚年更高的自杀行为可能性和更严重的自杀意念相关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;135:152523. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152523. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
6
Adaptive and Dark Personality in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Predicting Health-Behavior Endorsement and the Appeal of Public-Health Messages.新冠疫情中的适应性与黑暗人格:预测健康行为认同及公共卫生信息的吸引力
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Jul;12(5):697-707. doi: 10.1177/1948550620936439.
7
A combination of strongly associated prothrombotic single nucleotide polymorphisms could efficiently predict venous thrombosis risk.强相关的促血栓形成单核苷酸多态性组合能够有效预测静脉血栓形成风险。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Sep 6;10:1224462. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1224462. eCollection 2023.
8
Nonclinical Features in Predictive Modeling of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Machine Learning Approach.非临床特征在心血管疾病预测模型中的应用:一种机器学习方法。
Interdiscip Sci. 2021 Jun;13(2):201-211. doi: 10.1007/s12539-021-00423-w. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
9
Psychological and Behavioural Responses to Coronavirus Disease 2019: The Role of Personality.对2019冠状病毒病的心理和行为反应:人格的作用。
Eur J Pers. 2020 Jul 8. doi: 10.1002/per.2281.
10
A Validation Study of the Mini-IPIP Five-Factor Personality Scale in Adults With Cancer.癌症成人中迷你 IPIP 五因素人格量表的验证研究。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Mar-Apr;102(2):153-163. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1644341. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
净重新分类指数(NRI):即使使用独立测试数据集,也是一种误导性的预测改善衡量指标。
Stat Biosci. 2015 Oct 1;7(2):282-295. doi: 10.1007/s12561-014-9118-0. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
4
Mortality Risk Prediction: Can Comorbidity Indices Be Improved With Psychosocial Data?死亡风险预测:心理社会数据能否改善合并症指数?
Med Care. 2015 Nov;53(11):909-15. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000428.
5
The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.人格的力量:人格特质、社会经济地位和认知能力在预测重要人生结果方面的比较效度
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
6
Derived Trail Making Test indices: demographics and cognitive background variables across the adult life span.修订版连线测验指标:成年期全年龄段的人口统计学和认知背景变量
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2015;22(6):667-78. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1027650. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
7
Predicting the risk of mild cognitive impairment in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging.在梅奥诊所衰老研究中预测轻度认知障碍的风险。
Neurology. 2015 Apr 7;84(14):1433-42. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001437. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
8
Personality and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: Data From a Longitudinal Sample and Meta-Analysis.老年人的人格与认知衰退:来自纵向样本和荟萃分析的数据
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Jul;71(4):591-601. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu184. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
9
Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies.预防痴呆症的目标风险因素:基于观察性研究证据的系统评价与德尔菲共识研究
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;30(3):234-46. doi: 10.1002/gps.4245. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
10
Personality plasticity, healthy aging, and interventions.人格可塑性、健康老龄化与干预措施。
Dev Psychol. 2014 May;50(5):1470-4. doi: 10.1037/a0036028.