• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用极端梯度提升回归的比例风险模型对认知正常受试者和轻度认知障碍患者进行生存分析。

Survival Analysis in Cognitively Normal Subjects and in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Proportional Hazards Model with Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression.

机构信息

Machine Vision and Medical Image Processing (MVMIP) Laboratory, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Systems Engineering, École deTechnologie Supérieure, Université du Québec, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(2):837-850. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215266.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-215266
PMID:34864679
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in cognitively normal (CN) and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is extremely important. While MCI-to-AD progression risk has been studied extensively, few studies estimate CN-to-MCI conversion risk. The Cox proportional hazards (PH), a widely used survival analysis model, assumes a linear predictor-risk relationship. Generalizing the PH model to more complex predictor-risk relationships may increase risk estimation accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a PH model using an Xgboost regressor, based on demographic, genetic, neuropsychiatric, and neuroimaging predictors to estimate risk of AD in patients with MCI, and the risk of MCI in CN subjects.

METHODS

We replaced the Cox PH linear model with an Xgboost regressor to capture complex interactions between predictors, and non-linear predictor-risk associations. We endeavored to limit model inputs to noninvasive and more widely available predictors in order to facilitate future applicability in a wider setting.

RESULTS

In MCI-to-AD (n = 882), the Xgboost model achieved a concordance index (C-index) of 84.5%. When the model was used for MCI risk prediction in CN (n = 100) individuals, the C-index was 73.3%. In both applications, the C-index was statistically significantly higher in the Xgboost in comparison to the Cox PH model.

CONCLUSION

Using non-linear regressors such as Xgboost improves AD dementia risk assessment in CN and MCI. It is possible to achieve reasonable risk stratification using predictors that are relatively low-cost in terms of time, invasiveness, and availability. Future strategies for improving AD dementia risk estimation are discussed.

摘要

背景

评估认知正常(CN)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险极其重要。虽然已经广泛研究了 MCI 向 AD 的进展风险,但很少有研究估计 CN 向 MCI 的转换风险。Cox 比例风险(PH)是一种广泛使用的生存分析模型,它假设预测风险关系呈线性。将 PH 模型推广到更复杂的预测风险关系可能会提高风险估计的准确性。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种使用 Xgboost 回归器的 PH 模型,该模型基于人口统计学、遗传学、神经精神和神经影像学预测因子,用于估计 MCI 患者的 AD 风险,以及 CN 受试者的 MCI 风险。

方法

我们用 Xgboost 回归器代替 Cox PH 线性模型,以捕捉预测因子之间的复杂相互作用和非线性预测风险关联。我们努力将模型输入限制为非侵入性和更广泛可用的预测因子,以便在更广泛的环境中更方便地应用。

结果

在 MCI 向 AD(n = 882)的转化中,Xgboost 模型的一致性指数(C-index)为 84.5%。当该模型用于预测 CN(n = 100)个体中的 MCI 风险时,C-index 为 73.3%。在这两种应用中,Xgboost 的 C-index 均显著高于 Cox PH 模型。

结论

使用 Xgboost 等非线性回归器可提高 CN 和 MCI 患者的 AD 痴呆风险评估。使用相对低成本(时间、侵入性和可用性)的预测因子进行合理的风险分层是可能的。讨论了改善 AD 痴呆风险估计的未来策略。

相似文献

1
Survival Analysis in Cognitively Normal Subjects and in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Using a Proportional Hazards Model with Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression.使用极端梯度提升回归的比例风险模型对认知正常受试者和轻度认知障碍患者进行生存分析。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(2):837-850. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215266.
2
Validating the role of the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) and a genetic risk score in progression to cognitive impairment in a population-based cohort of older adults followed for 12 years.在一个对老年人进行了12年随访的基于人群的队列中,验证澳大利亚国立大学阿尔茨海默病风险指数(ANU-ADRI)和遗传风险评分在进展为认知障碍中的作用。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017 Mar 4;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0240-3.
3
The Apathy Evaluation Scale: A Comparison of Subject, Informant, and Clinician Report in Cognitively Normal Elderly and Mild Cognitive Impairment.冷漠评估量表:认知正常老年人与轻度认知障碍患者的自评、知情者评和临床医生评比较
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(2):421-32. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150146.
4
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of the Combination of Two Measures of Verbal Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease.两种言语记忆测量方法联合应用对阿尔茨海默病所致轻度认知障碍的诊断及预后价值
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):909-918. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170073.
5
Depression in mild cognitive impairment is associated with progression to Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal study.轻度认知障碍中的抑郁与阿尔茨海默病的进展相关:一项纵向研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(4):1239-50. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140405.
6
Subjective cognitive concerns and neuropsychiatric predictors of progression to the early clinical stages of Alzheimer disease.主观认知担忧与阿尔茨海默病早期临床阶段进展的神经精神预测因素
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;22(12):1642-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Prevalence of mild behavioural impairment and its association with cognitive and functional impairment in normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and mild Alzheimer's dementia.在正常认知、轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病痴呆症中,轻度行为障碍的流行率及其与认知和功能障碍的关系。
Psychogeriatrics. 2024 May;24(3):555-564. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13092. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
8
Risk classification in mild cognitive impairment patients for developing Alzheimer's disease.轻度认知障碍患者发展为阿尔茨海默病的风险分类。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;30(2):367-75. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-112117.
9
A parameter-efficient deep learning approach to predict conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease.一种参数高效的深度学习方法,用于预测轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病的转化。
Neuroimage. 2019 Apr 1;189:276-287. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.031. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Associations of MRI-visible perivascular spaces with longitudinal cognitive decline across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.MRI 可见血管周围空间与阿尔茨海默病谱中纵向认知衰退的关联。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 Dec 13;14(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01136-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Limited generalizability and high risk of bias in multivariable models predicting conversion risk from mild cognitive impairment to dementia: A systematic review.预测轻度认知障碍向痴呆症转化风险的多变量模型的泛化性有限且存在高偏倚风险:一项系统评价。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70069. doi: 10.1002/alz.70069.
2
Random survival forest model for early prediction of Alzheimer's disease conversion in early and late Mild cognitive impairment stages.用于早期和晚期轻度认知障碍阶段阿尔茨海默病转化早期预测的随机生存森林模型
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 13;19(12):e0314725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314725. eCollection 2024.
3
Acute ischemic stroke prediction and predictive factors analysis using hematological indicators in elderly hypertensives post-transient ischemic attack.
利用老年高血压患者短暂性脑缺血发作后血液学指标预测急性缺血性脑卒中及分析其预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 6;14(1):695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51402-2.
4
Deep learning for risk-based stratification of cognitively impaired individuals.用于认知障碍个体基于风险分层的深度学习
iScience. 2023 Aug 2;26(9):107522. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107522. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
5
Predicting Progression to Clinical Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Using the Random Survival Forest.使用随机生存森林预测向临床阿尔茨海默病痴呆的进展。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;95(2):535-548. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230208.
6
Quantification of identifying cognitive impairment using olfactory-stimulated functional near-infrared spectroscopy with machine learning: a post hoc analysis of a diagnostic trial and validation of an external additional trial.使用机器学习的嗅觉刺激功能近红外光谱定量识别认知障碍:一项诊断试验的事后分析和外部附加试验的验证。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2023 Jul 22;15(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13195-023-01268-9.