• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让年轻人从研究开始到二次数据分析全程参与“光明计划”:十年用户参与的见解

Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: insights from 10 years of user involvement.

作者信息

Taylor Rachel M, Whelan Jeremy S, Gibson Faith, Morgan Sue, Fern Lorna A

机构信息

1Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

2School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 27;4:50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x
PMID:30607259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6307198/
Abstract

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

Young people with cancer are often described as 'hard to reach', 'difficult to engage' and/or 'vulnerable'. Consequently, they are often over looked for patient and public involvement activities. We set out to involve young people with cancer to work as co-researchers in the design of the largest ever study of young people with cancer, called BRIGHTLIGHT. In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people as co-researchers, collaborators, consultants and dissemination partners. We chronicle the key points of this 10-year journey, sharing our success, describing our challenges and the solutions we put in place; sharing also what worked and did not work. Here we share some of these experiences of involving young people in this research and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same.

ABSTRACT

Young people with cancer, broadly those aged 13-24 years at diagnosis, warrant special attention; physiological and psychological growth creates complex psychosocial needs which neither adult nor child systems are suitably designed to deal with. Resulting from these needs, they are often described as 'vulnerable', 'hard to reach' and 'difficult to engage', and consequently are often over looked for patient and public involvement/engagement (PPIE) roles. In our study 'BRIGHTLIGHT', we set out to evaluate whether specialist care for young people adds value, ensuring young people were central to our PPIE activities. We believe that BRIGHTLIGHT is unique as a very large study of young people with cancer which has successfully overcome the challenges of including young people in the research process so we are confident that they have influenced every aspect of study design, conduct and dissemination. We chronicle a period of 10 years, over which we describe our approach and our methods to involving young people in PPIE activities in BRIGHTLIGHT. We describe the feasibility work, study set up, conduct and dissemination of our findings, and weave through our story of PPIE to illustrate its benefits. Through the narration of our experience we highlight significant points that both influenced and changed our direction of travel. We reflect on our experiences and offer some practical advice for those looking to do the same. In the 10 years since the BRIGHTLIGHT feasibility work began we have involved more than 1200 young people. Their contributions have been isolated and mapped over a 10-year period. We begin at an early step of identifying what research questions to prioritize, we then plot PPIE activities for one of these research priorities, place of care, which evolved into BRIGHTLIGHT. We document steps along the way to evidence the impact of this involvement. Young people can make a valuable contribution to healthcare research given adequate support from the research team. Although some challenges exist, we propose that the benefits to young people, researchers and the study considerably outweigh these challenges and PPIE with young people should be integrated in all similar research studies.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8105/6307198/e919bb3bc2ad/40900_2018_135_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8105/6307198/c0f97291171b/40900_2018_135_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8105/6307198/e919bb3bc2ad/40900_2018_135_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8105/6307198/c0f97291171b/40900_2018_135_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8105/6307198/e919bb3bc2ad/40900_2018_135_Fig3_HTML.jpg
摘要

通俗易懂的总结

患癌青少年常被描述为“难以接触到”“难以参与进来”和/或“易受伤害”。因此,他们在患者及公众参与活动中常常被忽视。我们着手让患癌青少年作为共同研究者参与有史以来规模最大的患癌青少年研究“BRIGHTLIGHT”的设计工作。自BRIGHTLIGHT可行性研究工作开展的10年来,我们已让1200多名青少年作为共同研究者、合作者、顾问和传播合作伙伴参与其中。我们记录了这10年历程的关键点,分享我们的成功经验,描述我们遇到的挑战以及我们采取的解决办法;也分享哪些做法有效,哪些无效。在此,我们分享让青少年参与这项研究的一些经验,并为那些希望做同样事情的人提供一些实用建议。

摘要

患癌青少年,大致指诊断时年龄在13至24岁的人群,值得特别关注;生理和心理的成长产生了复杂的社会心理需求,而成人及儿童体系都没有妥善设计来应对这些需求。由于这些需求,他们常被描述为“易受伤害”“难以接触到”“难以参与进来”,因此在患者及公众参与/介入(PPIE)角色方面常常被忽视。在我们的“BRIGHTLIGHT”研究中,我们着手评估为青少年提供的专科护理是否有附加价值,确保青少年在我们的PPIE活动中处于核心地位。我们认为BRIGHTLIGHT作为一项针对患癌青少年的大型研究是独一无二的,它成功克服了让青少年参与研究过程中的挑战,所以我们相信他们已对研究设计、实施和传播的各个方面产生了影响。我们记录了10年的时间,在此期间我们描述了让青少年参与BRIGHTLIGHT中PPIE活动的方法和途径。我们描述了可行性研究工作、研究的设立、实施以及研究结果的传播,并在我们的PPIE故事中穿插说明其益处。通过讲述我们的经历,我们突出了那些影响并改变我们前行方向的要点。我们反思我们的经历,并为那些希望做同样事情的人提供一些实用建议。自BRIGHTLIGHT可行性研究工作开始的10年里,我们已让1200多名青少年参与其中。他们的贡献在10年期间得到了梳理和记录。我们从确定优先考虑哪些研究问题的早期步骤开始,然后为其中一个研究重点——护理地点,规划PPIE活动,该活动后来演变成了BRIGHTLIGHT。我们记录了一路走来的各个步骤,以证明这种参与所产生的影响。只要研究团队给予足够支持,青少年就能为医疗保健研究做出宝贵贡献。尽管存在一些挑战,但我们认为对青少年、研究人员和研究而言,益处远远超过这些挑战,并且让青少年参与PPIE应该融入所有类似的研究中。

相似文献

1
Involving young people in BRIGHTLIGHT from study inception to secondary data analysis: insights from 10 years of user involvement.让年轻人从研究开始到二次数据分析全程参与“光明计划”:十年用户参与的见解
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 27;4:50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0135-x. eCollection 2018.
2
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
3
BRIGHTLIGHT researchers as 'dramaturgs': creating from complex research data.“明亮之光”研究项目的研究人员作为“戏剧编剧”:从复杂的研究数据中进行创作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Aug 10;6:48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00222-5. eCollection 2020.
4
Qualitative Study定性研究
5
To summarise the approach to and findings of the PPIE undertaken as part of a programme of secondary research with a vulnerable, hard to reach population during the COVID-19 pandemic.总结在新冠疫情期间,针对弱势群体这一难以接触的人群开展的二次研究项目的一部分——患者和公众参与及参与式评价(PPIE)的方法和结果。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 May 10;9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00416-7.
6
Co-designing new tools for collecting, analysing and presenting patient experience data in NHS services: working in partnership with patients and carers.共同设计用于收集、分析和呈现英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)服务中患者体验数据的新工具:与患者及护理人员合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 27;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00329-3.
7
Co-Designing a Digital App to Support Young People's Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (VoiceIn): Development and Usability Study.共同设计一款支持年轻人参与患者和公众事务的数字应用程序(VoiceIn):开发和可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 24;11:e53394. doi: 10.2196/53394.
8
Involving People With Lived Experience in Electronic Health Record Database Studies Reflections and Learning From the CHOOSE Study.让有实际经验的人参与电子健康记录数据库研究:对CHOOSE研究的思考与收获
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70131. doi: 10.1111/hex.70131.
9
Evaluation of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England: interpreting BRIGHTLIGHT study results through the lens of young people with cancer.英格兰青少年和青年成人专科癌症服务评估:透过癌症青年患者视角解读BRIGHTLIGHT研究结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 29;11(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00739-7.
10
Using the UK standards for public involvement to evaluate the public involvement sections of annual reports from NIHR managed research centres.使用英国公众参与标准来评估英国国家卫生研究院管理的研究中心年度报告中的公众参与部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 30;9(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00517-3.

引用本文的文献

1
"Meet us where we're at:" Towards engaging and inclusive research with young adults with a lived experience of cancer.“在我们所处的地方与我们相聚”:致力于与有癌症亲身经历的年轻人开展参与性和包容性研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 16;9(1):e159. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10101. eCollection 2025.
2
When Research Evidence and Healthcare Policy Collide: Synergising Results and Policy into BRIGHTLIGHT Guidance to Improve Coordinated Care for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.当研究证据与医疗政策发生冲突时:将研究结果与政策相结合,形成BRIGHTLIGHT指南,以改善对青少年和青年癌症患者的协调护理。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 26;13(15):1821. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151821.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Conceptualizing age-appropriate care for teenagers and young adults with cancer: a qualitative mixed-methods study.为青少年和青年癌症患者制定适合其年龄阶段的护理方案:一项定性混合方法研究。
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Oct 24;9:149-166. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S182176. eCollection 2018.
2
Online information and support needs of young people with cancer: a participatory action research study.癌症青少年的在线信息与支持需求:一项参与式行动研究
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Sep 17;9:121-135. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S173115. eCollection 2018.
3
Sex, Body Image, and Relationships: A BRIGHTLIGHT Workshop on Information and Support Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults.
Parents of Children and Young People With Long-Term Physical Health Conditions-Experiences of Navigating School.
患有长期身体健康问题的儿童和青少年的父母——在学校的经历
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Sep;51(5):e70132. doi: 10.1111/cch.70132.
4
Longitudinal Cohort Study of the Relationship Between Illness Perception, Perceived Social Support, and Psychosocial Quality of Life in Adolescents and Young Adults Newly Diagnosed with Cancer: Outcomes from a BRIGHTLIGHT Study.新诊断癌症的青少年和青年中疾病认知、感知社会支持与心理社会生活质量关系的纵向队列研究:BRIGHTLIGHT研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;17(12):1918. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121918.
5
Evaluation of specialist cancer services for teenagers and young adults in England: interpreting BRIGHTLIGHT study results through the lens of young people with cancer.英格兰青少年和青年成人专科癌症服务评估:透过癌症青年患者视角解读BRIGHTLIGHT研究结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 29;11(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00739-7.
6
Factors Affecting Psychosocial Distress in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: BRIGHTLIGHT Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Cohort Study Results.影响青少年和青年癌症患者心理社会困扰的因素:BRIGHTLIGHT横断面和纵向队列研究结果
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;17(7):1196. doi: 10.3390/cancers17071196.
7
Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.在儿科人群中开展以患者为导向的研究:一项叙述性综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;11(10):1266. doi: 10.3390/children11101266.
8
Qualitative Study Examining Attendance for Secondary School Pupils With Long-Term Physical Health Conditions.一项关于研究患有长期身体健康问题的中学生出勤情况的定性研究。
Contin Educ. 2024 May 15;5(1):76-89. doi: 10.5334/cie.111. eCollection 2024.
9
Asking those who know their needs best: A framework for active engagement and involvement of childhood cancer survivors and parents in the process of psychosocial research-A workshop report.让最了解需求的人参与:一项在心理社会研究中积极争取儿童癌症幸存者及其父母参与的框架 - 研讨会报告
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 May;7(5):e2071. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2071.
10
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
性、身体意象和人际关系:BRIGHTLIGHT 青少年和年轻人信息与支持需求研讨会。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018 Oct;7(5):572-578. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0025. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Power to the people: To what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this?权力属于人民:公众参与应用健康研究在多大程度上做到了这一点?
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Aug 17;2:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0042-y. eCollection 2016.
5
Qualitative study to understand the barriers to recruiting young people with cancer to BRIGHTLIGHT: a national cohort study in England.定性研究,以了解招募癌症青年参与 BRIGHTLIGHT 研究的障碍:英格兰全国队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e018291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018291.
6
Combining PPI with qualitative research to engage 'harder-to-reach' populations: service user groups as co-applicants on a platform study for a trial.将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)与定性研究相结合以接触“更难接触到”的人群:服务用户群体作为平台研究试验的共同申请人
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Mar 24;2:7. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0023-1. eCollection 2016.
7
Optimizing a Retention Strategy with Young People for BRIGHTLIGHT, a Longitudinal Cohort Study Examining the Value of Specialist Cancer Care for Young People.为BRIGHTLIGHT优化针对年轻人的留存策略,这是一项纵向队列研究,旨在探讨专科癌症护理对年轻人的价值。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017 Sep;6(3):459-469. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0085. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
Direct access to potential research participants for a cohort study using a confidentiality waiver included in UK National Health Service legal statutes.通过英国国家医疗服务体系法律法规中包含的保密豁免条款,直接接触队列研究的潜在研究参与者。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 1;6(8):e011847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011847.
9
Modified international e-Delphi survey to define healthcare professional competencies for working with teenagers and young adults with cancer.修订后的国际电子德尔菲调查,以确定与青少年和年轻癌症患者合作的医疗保健专业人员的能力。
BMJ Open. 2016 May 3;6(5):e011361. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011361.
10
"Your Place or Mine?" Priorities for a Specialist Teenage and Young Adult (TYA) Cancer Unit: Disparity Between TYA and Professional Perceptions.“去你那儿还是来我这儿?”青少年及青年成人(TYA)专科癌症治疗中心的工作重点:TYA与专业人士认知之间的差异
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2011 Sep;1(3):145-51. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2011.0037.