Downes J, Andrew J H
Department of Microbiology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne.
Pathology. 1988 Jul;20(3):256-9. doi: 10.3109/00313028809059503.
The RapID ANA system (Innovative Diagnostic Systems Inc., Atlanta, Ga, USA), a 4-hour micromethod for identifying clinically important anaerobic bacteria, was evaluated using 196 anaerobic clinical isolates and the results were compared with those obtained by applying conventional Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VPI) methodology. The identifications achieved by the RapID ANA system for 141 (72%) of these isolates agreed with the species identifications obtained using VPI methodology, without the need for additional tests. A further 40 (20%) were in agreement after performance of additional suggested tests, 11 (6%) were misidentified and 4 (2%) could not be identified using the RapID ANA system. Excellent agreement between the two methods was demonstrated for the Gram-positive cocci and good agreement for the Gram-negative bacilli. The RapID ANA system was suboptimal in the identification of Clostridium species other than C. perfringens.
RapID ANA系统(美国佐治亚州亚特兰大市创新诊断系统公司)是一种用于鉴定临床上重要厌氧细菌的4小时微量方法,使用196株厌氧临床分离株对其进行了评估,并将结果与应用传统弗吉尼亚理工学院(VPI)方法获得的结果进行了比较。RapID ANA系统对其中141株(72%)分离株的鉴定结果与使用VPI方法获得的菌种鉴定结果一致,无需进行额外测试。在进行额外建议测试后,另有40株(20%)结果一致,11株(6%)被错误鉴定,4株(2%)使用RapID ANA系统无法鉴定。两种方法在革兰氏阳性球菌的鉴定上显示出极佳的一致性,在革兰氏阴性杆菌的鉴定上显示出良好的一致性。RapID ANA系统在鉴定除产气荚膜梭菌以外的梭菌属菌种方面表现欠佳。