Murray P R, Weber C J, Niles A C
J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Jul;22(1):52-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.1.52-55.1985.
The accuracy of two new 4-h identification systems for anaerobes, the AN-IDENT (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) and the RapID ANA (Innovative Diagnostic Systems, Inc., Atlanta, Ga.) was compared with that of the API 20A system (Analytab Products). A total of 132 clinical isolates were tested in each of the three systems. The overall accuracies at the genus and species level for the three systems were: API 20A, 68.9 and 56.8%, respectively; AN-IDENT, 90.2 and 73.5%; and RapID ANA, 93.9 and 81.8%. Improved identification of anaerobes with the AN-IDENT and the RapID ANA systems was observed for isolates of the genus Fusobacterium, Clostridium species other than Clostridium perfringens, non-spore-forming bacilli, and isolates of the genus Peptostreptococcus. Reproducibility studies demonstrated that the results of the individual test reactions in all three identification systems were reproducible when the interpretive guidelines of the manufacturer were followed precisely.
对两种新型厌氧菌4小时鉴定系统AN - IDENT（Analytab Products公司，纽约州普莱恩维尤）和RapID ANA（创新诊断系统公司，佐治亚州亚特兰大）的准确性与API 20A系统（Analytab Products公司）进行了比较。在这三种系统中，每种系统都对总共132株临床分离株进行了检测。这三种系统在属和种水平的总体准确率分别为：API 20A为68.9%和56.8%；AN - IDENT为90.2%和73.5%；RapID ANA为93.9%和81.8%。对于梭杆菌属、除产气荚膜梭菌外的其他梭菌属、无芽孢杆菌以及消化链球菌属的分离株，使用AN - IDENT和RapID ANA系统观察到厌氧菌鉴定得到了改进。重复性研究表明，当严格遵循制造商的解释指南时，所有三种鉴定系统中各个测试反应的结果都是可重复的。
