Suppr超能文献

用于厌氧菌鉴定的4小时ATB 32A方法的准确性和可重复性。

Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification.

作者信息

Kitch T T, Appelbaum P C

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania 17033.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Nov;27(11):2509-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2509-2513.1989.

Abstract

The ATB 32A system (API System SA, La Balme les Grottes, Montalieu-Vercieu, France) was evaluated for use in the identification of 214 anaerobes. Organisms included 73 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group, 24 Bacteroides spp., 10 fusobacteria, 43 clostridia, 28 cocci, and 36 gram-positive, nonsporeforming rods. With the concomitant use of Gram stain, pigmentation, catalase testing, and aerobic growth, the ATB 32A system correctly identified 97% of the B. fragilis group isolates, 88% of Bacteroides spp., 50% of fusobacteria, 74% of clostridia, 100% of cocci, and 86% of the gram-positive, nonsporeforming rods. Overall, 188 strains (88%) were correctly identified, with 18 (8%) requiring extra tests, other than the four mentioned above, for correct identification. Eight strains were misidentified, including one Bacteroides sp., three fusobacteria, one Clostridium sp., and three gram-positive, nonsporeforming rods. Reproducibility was very good, with 12 of 14 strains (86%) tested in triplicate yielding identical correct results on each of three occasions and 2 strains (14%) yielding identical correct results on two occasions. There was a low-probability identification (including the correct species) on the third testing. The ATB 32A system represents a worthwhile advance in systems used for the identification of clinically significant anaerobic bacteria.

摘要

对ATB 32A系统(API System SA,法国蒙塔利厄韦尔西厄拉巴尔姆莱格罗特)进行了评估,以用于鉴定214株厌氧菌。这些微生物包括73株脆弱拟杆菌属菌株、24株拟杆菌属菌株、10株梭杆菌属菌株、43株梭菌属菌株、28株球菌以及36株革兰氏阳性无芽孢杆菌。通过同时使用革兰氏染色、色素形成、过氧化氢酶检测及需氧生长情况,ATB 32A系统正确鉴定出97%的脆弱拟杆菌属菌株、88%的拟杆菌属菌株、50%的梭杆菌属菌株、74%的梭菌属菌株、100%的球菌以及86%的革兰氏阳性无芽孢杆菌。总体而言,188株菌株(88%)被正确鉴定,其中18株(8%)除上述四项检测外还需额外检测才能正确鉴定。8株菌株被误鉴定,包括1株拟杆菌属菌株、3株梭杆菌属菌株、1株梭菌属菌株以及3株革兰氏阳性无芽孢杆菌。重复性非常好,14株菌株中的12株(86%)进行了三次重复检测,在三次检测中每次都得出相同的正确结果,2株菌株(14%)在两次检测中得出相同的正确结果,第三次检测出现低概率鉴定结果(包括正确的菌种)。ATB 32A系统在用于鉴定具有临床意义的厌氧菌的系统方面代表了一项有价值的进展。

相似文献

10
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.三种厌氧菌鉴定方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983.

引用本文的文献

5
Gram-positive anaerobic cocci.革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998 Jan;11(1):81-120. doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.1.81.

本文引用的文献

6
Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.三种厌氧菌鉴定方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Sep;18(3):614-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.614-621.1983.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验